UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant ☒     Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐             Preliminary Proxy Statement

            Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (As Permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☒             Definitive Proxy Statement

☐             Definitive Additional Materials

☐             Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12

NeoGenomics, Inc.

 

LOGO

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):

 

  No fee required.
  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)   Title of each class of securities to which the transaction applies:

(2)   Aggregate number of securities to which the transaction applies:

(3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)   Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as providedFee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act RuleRules 0-11(a)(2)14a-6(i)(1) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)   Amount Previously Paid:

(2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)   Filing Party:

(4)   Date Filed:

0-11.


LOGO

April 14, 2022

NeoGenomics, Inc.

12701 Commonwealth Drive

Suite 99490 NeoGenomics Way

Fort Myers, Florida 3391333912

To our Stockholders:

On behalf of the Board of Directors, it is my pleasure to invite you to attend our 20212022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of NeoGenomics, Inc., which will be held on Thursday, May 27, 2021,June 2, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. The 2022 Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting which will be conducted via live webcast.

Details regarding the meeting and the business to be conducted are described in the accompanying Proxy Statement. In addition to considering the matters described in the Proxy Statement, we will report on matters of interest to our stockholders.

We are pleased to inform you that instead of a paper copy of our proxy materials, most of our stockholders will be mailed a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice of Internet Availability”). on April 14, 2022. The Notice of Internet Availability contains instructions on how to access proxy materials and how to submit your proxy over the Internet.internet. The Notice of Internet Availability also contains instructions on how to request a paper copy of our proxy materials, if desired. All stockholders who do not receive a Notice of Internet Availability will be mailed a paper copy of the proxy materials. Furnishing proxy materials over the internet allows us to provide our stockholders with the information they need in a timely manner, while reducing the environmental impact and lowering the costs of printing and distributing our proxy materials.

Your vote is important to us. Please act as soon as possible to vote your shares. It is important that your shares be represented at the meeting whether or not you plan to attend the live webcast of the 2022 Annual Meeting. Please vote electronically over the Internet,internet, by telephone, or, if you receive a paper copy of the proxy card by mail, by returning your signed proxy card in the envelope provided. You may also vote your shares online during the 2022 Annual Meeting. Instructions on how to vote while participating at the meeting live via the Internetinternet are posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NEO2021.NEO2022.

On behalf of the Board of Directors and management, we thank you for your continued support and confidence in NeoGenomics.

Sincerely,

 

LOGOLOGO

Douglas M. VanOortLynn A. Tetrault

Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerChair of the Board of Directors

April 15, 2021


LOGO

Notice of 20212022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of NeoGenomics, Inc., will be held on Thursday, May 27, 2021,June 2, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. The 2022 Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting, which will be conducted via live webcast. You will be able to attend the 2022 Annual Meeting online and submit your questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NEO2021.NEO2022. For instructions on how to attend and vote your shares at the 2022 Annual Meeting, see the information in the accompanying Proxy Statement.

ITEMS OF BUSINESS:

1. To elect nineseven directors from the nominees named in the attached Proxy Statement.

2. To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, executive compensationcompensation.

3. To approve the SecondThird Amendment of the AmendedEmployee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan.restated).

4. To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021.2022.

5. To consider any other business properly brought before the 2022 Annual Meeting.

RECORD DATE:

You can vote if you were a stockholder of record as of the close of business on March 31, 2021.April 5, 2022.

PROXY VOTING:

It is important that your shares be represented at the 2022 Annual Meeting regardless of the number of shares you hold. Whether or not you expect to virtually attend, please complete, date, sign and return the accompanying proxy card in the enclosed envelope or use the telephone or internet method of voting as described on your proxy card to ensure the presence of a quorum at the meeting. Even if you have voted by proxy and you virtually attend the meeting, you may, if you prefer, revoke your proxy and vote your shares virtually.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Denise

LOGO

Halley E. PedullaGilbert

Corporate Secretary

Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Thursday, May 27, 2021.June 2, 2022. Our 2022 Proxy Statement and 2021 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at www.proxyvote.com.


TABLE OF CONTENTSTable of Contents

 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETINGCorporate Governance

   12 

PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

   5

General

58 

Information as to Nominees and Other Directors

   5

Corporate Governance

98 

Information Regarding Meetings and Committees of the Board

   10

Stockholder Recommendations For Board Candidates

13

Stockholder Communications with the Board

1312 

Vote Required for Approval

   1315 

Board Recommendation

   1315 

PROPOSAL 2—ADVISORY VOTE ON THEEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PAID TO OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

   14

General

1416 

Vote Required for Approval

   1416 

Board Recommendation

   1416
PROPOSAL 3—APPROVAL OF THIRD AMENDMENT OF THE EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED)17 

PROPOSAL 3—SECOND AMENDMENT OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED EQUITY INCENTIVE PLANVote Required for Approval

   1519

Board Recommendation

20
PROPOSAL 4—RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM21

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees

21

Audit Committee Report

22 

Vote Required for Approval

   22 

Board Recommendation

   22 

PROPOSAL 4—RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMExecutive Officers

   23 

Vote Required for Approval

23

Board Recommendation

23

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATIONCompensation of Directors

   24 

AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERSEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

   25

Audit Committee Report

25

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

26

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

33

Overview and Philosophy

3328 

Compensation DesignDiscussion and Analysis

   35

Culture and Compensation Governance

38

2020 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes

42

Additional Information

4828 

Culture and Compensation Committee Report

   4948 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLESExecutive Compensation Tables

   5049 

Summary Compensation Table

   5049 

Narrative to the Summary Compensation TableGrants of Plan-Based Awards

   51 

CEONarrative Disclosure to the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan Awards Table

52

Options Exercised and Stock Vested

54

Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2021

55

Employment Agreements and Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

56

Chief Executive Officer Pay Ratio

   5559
Equity Compensation Plan Information61 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

   56

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) REPORT

57

FUTURE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

58

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

59

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

60

CODE OF ETHICS AND CONDUCT

62 

OTHER MATTERS

62

INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCE

62

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 27, 2021Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

   63 

2021 ANNUAL MEETING PROXY MATERIAL RESULTSFuture Stockholder Proposals

   6364 

DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS TO STOCKHOLDERS SHARING AN ADDRESSTransactions with Related Persons

   6365 

ANNEX A: SECOND AMENDMENT OF THE NEOGENOMICS, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN (AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE AS OF OCTOBER 15, 2015)Other Matters

   A-165 

PROXY CARDIncorporation of Certain Information by Reference

  65
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on June 2, 202266
Questions and Answers About the 2022 Annual Meeting67
ANNEX A: Third Amendment of the NeoGenomics, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and Restated Effective June 1, 2018)A-1


NEOGENOMICS, INC.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE

20212022 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

NeoGenomics, Inc. (“we,,us,“us,our,“our,NeoGenomics,“NeoGenomics,” or the Company“Company”), having its principal executive offices at 12701 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 9,9490 NeoGenomics Way, Fort Myers, Florida 33913,33912, is providing these proxy materials in connection with the 20212022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of NeoGenomics, Inc. (the 2021“2022 Annual MeetingMeeting”). This Proxy Statement contains important information for you to consider when deciding how to vote on the matters brought before the 20212022 Annual Meeting.

The following is a summary of certain key disclosures in our Proxy Statement. This is only a summary and may not contain all the information that is important to you. For more complete information, please review the full Proxy Statement as well as our 2021 Annual Report, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on February 25, 2022.

Proposal 1 - Election of Directors

•   Six of our seven Director nominees are independent and represent a diverse background of qualifications and experience.

•   Our Board represents 43% gender and 14% racial /ethnic diversity.

•   All four Board Committees are independent.

LOGO The Board recommends a vote FOR each Director nominee.

LOGO Further information beginning on page 8.

Proposal 2 - Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

•   We strive for pay-for-performance and believe that performance objectives should align with our strategy over the long-term.

•   Our compensation philosophy is focused on providing compensation and benefits that are competitive and meet our goals of attracting, retaining and motivating highly skilled management.

LOGO The Board recommends a vote FOR this proposal.

LOGO Further information beginning on page 16.

Proposal 3 - Approval of the Third Amendment of the

Employee Stock Purchase Plan (As Amended and Restated)

•   The approval of the Third Amendment of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended and restated) will increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the ESPP by 1,000,000 shares to 2,500,000 shares and will extend the term of the Plan until June 2, 2032.

LOGO The Board recommends a vote FOR this proposal.

LOGO Further information beginning on page 17.

Proposal 4 - Ratification of Independent Registered Accounting Firm

•   The Audit Committee of the Board has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP to act as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022.

LOGO The Board recommends a vote FOR this proposal.

LOGO Further information beginning on page 21.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THECorporate Governance

Transforming Patient Care by Living our Values

We believe that strong corporate governance practices provide a framework for the Board’s oversight of the short-term and long-term health, strategy and overall success of NeoGenomics. We have established Corporate Governance Guidelines and a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that provide the foundation for our values of quality, integrity, accountability, teamwork and innovation. Our commitment to integrity and ethics starts at the top with our Board and senior management and extends to every NeoGenomics employee.

We recognize that the Board’s role and oversight extends to sustainability, human capital management, and environmental impact. We continue to have meaningful internal and external conversations about environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) policies and initiatives and are increasing our focus on related efforts. We believe that progress on these objectives aligns with our vision and further supports our progress towards our near and long-term strategic objectives.

Environmental, Social and Governance

We are passionate about promoting a World-Class Culture through employee engagement, training and development, wellness, work-life balance, and communication initiatives. We believe that a diverse and inclusive workforce, where all perspectives are recognized and respected, positively impacts our performance and strengthens our culture. We strive to promote a workplace in which people of diverse race, ethnicity, veteran status, marital status, socio-economic level, national origin, religious belief, physical ability, sexual orientation, age, class, political ideology, and gender identity and expression participate in, contribute to, and benefit equally.

Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging Vision

Cancer doesn’t discriminate, and neither do we.

While placing the value of people at the heart of our organization, we challenge ourselves every day to be more inclusive with our teams, clients, and community. We create an environment where culture engenders growth and innovation. We are champions of diversity and inclusion and take action to create an equitable culture where everyone belongs.

Our commitment to maintaining an excellent workplace includes investing in ongoing opportunities for employee development in a diverse and inclusive environment. We have worked to reflect gender and ethnic diversity and inclusion on our Board and diversity in gender and ethnicity is well-established within our workforce. As of December 31, 2021, ANNUAL MEETINGwomen made up 59% of our global workforce, 20% of our workforce was in supervisory or higher positions, and of that, 53% were female. With regard to the Company’s top two management tiers, 44% of our executive team and our vice presidents were women and 33% of our Board of Directors were women. Ethnicity is also strongly represented: 52% of our workforce and 11% of our Board of Directors were racially or ethnically diverse. Diversity is an active conversation at NeoGenomics including through employee-initiated and employee-led employee resource groups (“ERGs”) such as LGBTQ@Neo, Women@Neo, Veterans@Neo, We S.T.A.N.D@Neo (Standing Together Against Negativity and Discrimination), and Wellness@Neo. These ERGs reinforce our commitment to diversity by fostering community, providing education and support across the business, and facilitating dialogue on relevant and critical employee topics. We regularly seek the input of all of our employees through both in-person roundtables and anonymous weekly surveys. It is important to us that each of our employees has a voice, equal opportunity and a method to communicate their views in a way that they feel comfortable.

Q:  WhenOur employees’ health and wheresafety is important to us. During the COVID-19 pandemic we took measures to support our employees, including de-densifying our laboratories and facilities, adjusting laboratory shifts, restricting visitors to facilities, restricting employee travel, implementing an emergency paid time off policy, and providing remote work-environment training and support. We also established a NeoGenomics program that provided further financial assistance to those employees whose spouses were unable to work due to the pandemic or were otherwise significantly impacted by the pandemic.

In addition, we have established a number of health-focused measures for our employees while recognizing that health extends beyond only physical needs. Our Wellness@Neo ERG has a mission to support the financial, physical, emotional, and social wellness of our employees. The Wellness@Neo ERG sponsors education on a variety of topics including investing, student loan debt,

meditation, and yoga. We continually assess the benefits offered to our employees and in addition to competitive health plans, 401(k) matching and ESPP we offer contributions towards our employees’ student loan debt, tuition reimbursement, gym and fitness studio credits, and an employee assistance program that provides health, family, legal, and financial assistance. In 2021 NeoGenomics received an Inspiring Change Bronze level Aetna Workplace Well-being Award, demonstrating a strong commitment to improving the health of our employees through a comprehensive well-being strategy.

We also encourage and support community involvement and corporate philanthropy. As part of our social wellness program, we partner with VolunteerMatch Virtual Volunteer Opportunities and with Project Helping, a mental wellness organization that creates meaningful social and accessible volunteer experience to help people improve their mental wellness through service. Each year we also provide corporate giving to organizations that are aligned with our purposes and values. During 2021 we made charitable donations, education grants, sponsorship programs, and research grants.

NeoGREEN Vision
NeoGenomics is committed to upholding sustainable solutions that build trust with our employees, clients and stakeholders.

We believe our corporate responsibility includes a commitment to our environment, which we support through our NeoGREEN initiative. In 2021 we opened a new headquarters in Fort Myers, FL, which includes a new laboratory, warehouse and administrative facilities. We completed the design and construction of our new headquarters in accordance with the Sustainable SITE initiative that ensures that a project’s natural environment is valued and respected throughout every step of the building process. Additionally, we utilized low-emitting materials, energy and water efficient design, and utilize GS-42 certified janitorial and sustainable pest services. As a result, we are proud of NeoGenomics’ achievement of Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (“LEED”) certification for this facility. Developed by the U.S. Green Building Counsel, LEED is the 2021 Annual Meeting?most widely used green building rating system in the world and an international symbol of sustainability excellence. Our environmental efforts also focus on improvements in our waste, water and energy management.

A:

Corporate Governance Highlights
Independent Board Chair

•   New appointment in 2021 of independent Board Chair, Lynn Tetrault, with seven years’ tenure on NeoGenomics’ Board and extensive healthcare leadership experience. Ms. Tetrault was recently appointed as Executive Chair of the Board and is no longer considered independent.

Independent and diverse director nominees

•   Six of our seven directors are independent

•   All Board committees are comprised of independent directors

•   Four of our seven directors, representing 57% of our directors are diverse (either gender or race/ethnicity)

•   Directors have a broad range of experience, skills and qualifications (see ‘Director Diversity and Expertise’ on page 11)

Executive sessions of

non-employee directors

•   Non-employee directors meet regularly without management

Active board refreshment

•   Balanced mix of short and long-tenured directors

•   Three of our seven non-employee directors joined the Board within the last two years

•   Annual election of all directors

Continual assessments

•   Board and Committees complete annual self-evaluations

•   Annual Chief Executive Officer and executive management evaluation in alignment with corporate goals and objectives, including achievement of business and strategic objectives

Stock ownership guidelines

•   No hedging or pledging of NeoGenomics stock

•   Minimum holding requirements for directors and executive officers

Director Nominations. Our Board has a standing Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Nominating Committee”). The 2021 Annual Meeting will be held on Thursday, May 27, 2021 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. The Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting, which will be conducted via live webcast. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting onlineNominating Committee considers and submit your questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NEO2021 and entering your 16-digit control number included in your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. If you lose your 16-digit control number, you may join the Annual Meeting as a “Guest” but you will not be able to vote, ask questions or access the list of stockholders as of the close of business on March 31, 2021 (the “Record Date”).

Q:  Who is entitled to vote at the 2021 Annual Meeting?

A: Holders of NeoGenomics, Inc. common stock at the close of business on the Record Daterecommends candidates for the 2021 Annual Meeting established by our board of directors (the “Board”), are entitled to receive notice of the 2021 Annual Meeting (the “Meeting Notice”), and to vote their shares at the 2021 Annual Meeting and any related adjournments or postponements. The Meeting Notice, Proxy Statement and form of proxy are first expected to be made available to stockholders on or about April 15, 2021.

As of the close of business on the Record Date, there were 117,046,693 shares of our common stock outstanding, each entitled to one vote. We referelection to the holdersBoard and nominees for committee memberships and committee chairs.

Director candidates are considered based upon a variety of sharescriteria, including demonstrated business and professional skills and experiences relevant to our business and strategic direction, concern for long-term stockholder interests, personal integrity, and sound business judgment. The Nominating Committee seeks individuals from diverse professional backgrounds who combine a broad spectrum of our common stockrelevant industry and strategic experience and expertise as “stockholders” throughout this Proxy Statement.

Q:  Who can attend the 2021 Annual Meeting?

A:  Admission to the 2021 Annual Meeting is limited to:

• stockholders as of the close of business on the Record Date;

• holders of valid proxies for the 2021 Annual Meeting; and

• our invited guests.

Q:  What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a stockholder who holds stock in street name?

A:  If your shares are registered in your name, as evidenced and recordedset forth in the stock ledger maintained byStrategic Competencies Matrix. The Nominating Committee also emphasizes the importance of diversity, equity and inclusion with respect to age, gender, race and ethnicity, sexual orientation, and gender identity and believes that an inclusive environment offers the Company and our transfer agent, you are a stockholderstockholders diversity of record. If your shares are heldopinion and insight in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, these shares are held in street name.

If you are a stockholder of recordareas most important to us and youour corporate mission. All director candidates must have requested printed proxy materials, we have enclosed a proxy card for youtime available to use for voting. If you hold our shares in street name through one or more banks, brokers or other nominees, you will receivedevote to the Meeting Notice, together with voting instructions, from the third party or parties through which you hold your shares. If you requested printed proxy materials, your broker, bank or other nominee has enclosed a voting instruction card for you to use in directing the broker, bank or other nominee regarding how to vote your shares.

Q:  What are the quorum requirements for the 2021 Annual Meeting?

A:  The presence virtually or by proxy of persons entitled to vote a majority of shares of our outstanding common stock at the 2021 Annual Meeting constitutes a quorum. Your shares of our common stock will be counted as present at the 2021 Annual Meeting for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum if a proxy card has been properly submitted by you or on your behalf, or you vote virtually at the 2021 Annual Meeting. Abstaining votes and broker non-votes are counted for purposes of establishing a quorum.

Q:  What matters will the stockholders vote on at the 2021 Annual Meeting?

A:  The stockholders will vote on the following proposals:

• Proposal 1 - Election of Directors.

To elect nine members of our Board, each to hold office for a one year term ending on the dateactivities of the next succeeding annual meetingBoard. We also consider the independence of stockholders or until such director’s successor shall have been duly electeddirector candidates, including the appearance of any conflict in serving as a director. A director who does not meet all of these criteria may still be considered for nomination to the Board if our independent directors believe that the candidate will make an exceptional contribution to us and qualified.our stockholders.

• Proposal 2 - Advisory Vote onGenerally when evaluating and recommending candidates for election to the Compensation Paid to our Named Executive Officers.

• Proposal 3 - Second AmendmentBoard, the Nominating Committee will conduct candidate interviews, evaluate biographical information and background material, and assess the skills and experience of the Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan.

• Proposal 4 - Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Q:  What vote is required to approve each proposal?

A:   Provided a quorum is present, the following are the voting requirements for each proposal:

• Proposal 1 - Election of Directors.

Each of the nine nominees will be elected if a majority of the votes cast by stockholders virtually or via proxy are castcandidates against selection criteria set forth in favor of each respective nominee.

• Proposal 2 - Advisory Vote on the Compensation Paid to our Named Executive Officers.

Proposal 2 will be approved if a majority of the votes cast by stockholders virtually or via proxy with respect to this matter are cast in favor of the proposal.

• Proposal 3 - Second Amendment of the Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan.

Proposal 3 will be approved if a majority of the votes cast by stockholders in person or via proxy with respect to this matter are cast in favor of the proposal.

• Proposal 4 - Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Proposal 4 will be approved if a majority of the votes cast by stockholders virtually or via proxy with respect to this matter are cast in favor of the proposal.

Q: What are the Board’s voting recommendations?

A:  Our Board recommends that you vote your shares:

• “FOR” the nine directors nominated by our Board, each to serve until the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders or until such director’s successor shall have been duly elected and qualified.

“FOR” the approval of the proposal regarding the compensation paid to our named executive officers.

“FOR” the second amendment of our Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan; and

“FOR” the ratification of Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Q:  How do I vote?

A:  You may vote electronically at the meeting, by mail or by internet or telephone.

• At the meeting. To attend and participate in the Annual Meeting via live webcast, you will need the 16-digit control number included in your Notice and Access Card, on your proxy card or on the

instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. If your shares are heldStrategic Competencies Matrix in “street name,” you should contact your bank or brokerthe context of the then-current needs of the Company. In identifying potential director candidates the Board may also seek input from the executive officers and may also consider recommendations by employees, community leaders, business contacts, third-party search firms, and any other sources deemed appropriate by the Nominating Committee. The Nominating Committee will also consider director candidates recommended by stockholders to obtain your 16-digit control number or otherwise vote throughstand for election at the bank or broker. If you lose your 16-digit control number, you may join the Annual Meeting as a “Guest” but you will not be able to vote, ask questions or access the listannual meeting of stockholders so long as such recommendations are submitted in accordance with the procedures described below under “Stockholder Recommendations for Board Candidates.

Board Leadership Structure. Consistent with the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines our Board has a policy that allows the Chair of the Record Date.

• By mail. If you electedBoard and Chief Executive Officer positions to receive printed proxy materials by mail, you may vote by signingbe separate or combined and, returningif they are to be separate, allows the proxy card provided. Please allow sufficient time for mailing if you decide to vote by mail.

By internet or telephone. You may also vote over the internet at www.proxyvote.com or vote by telephone at 1-(800) 690-6903. Please see proxy card for voting instructions.

Q:  How can I change or revoke my vote?

A:  You may change your vote as follows:

Stockholders of record. You may change or revoke your vote by submitting a written notice of revocation to NeoGenomics, Inc., 12701 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 9, Fort Myers, Florida 33913, Attention: Denise E. Pedulla, Corporate Secretary, or by submitting another proxy card before the conclusionChair of the 2021 Annual Meeting. For all methods of voting,Board role to be either selected from among the last vote cast will supersede all previous votes.

Beneficial owners of shares held in“street name.” You may changeindependent directors or revoke your voting instructions by followingan executive officer. Our Board believes that it should have the specific directions providedflexibility to you by your bank or broker or other nominee.

Q:  What if I do not specify a choice for a matter when returning a proxy?

A:  Your proxy will be treated as follows:

Stockholders of record. If you are a stockholder of record and you sign and return a proxy card without giving specific voting instructions, then the proxy holders will vote your sharesmake these determinations at any given time in the manner recommended byway that it believes best to provide appropriate leadership for the Company. Our Board has reviewed the current Board leadership structure in light of the composition of the Board, the Company’s size, the nature of the Company’s business, the regulatory framework under which the Company operates, and other relevant factors.

Through April 18, 2021, the Board determined it was appropriate that Douglas M. VanOort serve as Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. On April 19, 2021, Mr. VanOort retired as Chief Executive Officer and was appointed Executive Chair of the Board. On October 7, 2021, Mr. VanOort retired as Executive Chair of the Board but remained a Director until November 10, 2021. Upon Mr. VanOort’s retirement as Chief Executive Officer, Mark W. Mallon was appointed Chief Executive Officer and a Director of the Company. On July 16, 2020, Lynn A. Tetrault was appointed Lead Independent Director until her appointment as non-executive Chair of the Board on October 7, 2021. Effective March 28, 2022, Mr. Mallon stepped down from his position as Chief Executive Officer and resigned from the Board. In connection with Mr. Mallon’s resignation, Ms. Tetrault was appointed the Executive Chair of the Board.

Director Independence. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that our Board will consist of a majority of independent directors and in making independence determinations, the Board will observe all matters presented in this Proxy Statement andapplicable requirements, including the applicable corporate governance listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”). Under Nasdaq rules, the Board has a responsibility to make an affirmative determination that those members of its Board that serve as the proxy holders may determine in their discretion for any other matters properly presented for a vote at the meeting.

Beneficial owners of shares held instreet name.” If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name andindependent directors do not providehave any relationships with the organizationCompany and its businesses that holds your shareswould impair their independence. In connection with specific voting instructions,these determinations the organization that holds your shares may generally vote on routine matters but cannot vote on non-routine matters. IfBoard reviews information regarding transactions, relationships, and arrangements involving the organization that holds your shares does not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares on a non-routine matter, the organization that holds your shares will inform the inspector of electionCompany and its businesses and each director that it does not have the authoritydeems relevant to vote on this matter with respect to your shares. This is referred to as a “broker non-vote.”

Q:  Which ballot measures are considered “routine” or “non-routine?”

A:  The ratification of appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (“Proposal 4”) is considered to be a routine matter under applicableindependence, including those required by Nasdaq rules. Broker non-votes are not expected to occur on this proposal.

The electionBoard has determined that each of the directors, with the exception of Mr. Mallon, were independent in 2021. Upon Ms. Tetrault’s appointment to Executive Chair of the Board on March 28, 2022 she was no longer independent. The Audit Committee, the Compliance Committee, the Culture and Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are each composed entirely of directors (“Proposal 1”),who are independent under Nasdaq rules and the advisory voteapplicable rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

Board Role in Risk Oversight.The Board administers its enterprise risk oversight function directly and through its Committees. The Board and the Audit Committee have primary oversight over enterprise risks and regularly discuss with management major risk exposures, including cybersecurity, their potential financial impact on the compensation paid to our named executive officers (“Proposal 2”)Company, and the second amendmentsteps taken to monitor, control and mitigate those risks. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (“Nominating Committee”) has primary oversight over ESG matters, the AmendedCulture and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (“Proposal 3”), are considered to be non-routine matters under applicable rules. A broker or other nominee cannot vote without instructions on non-routine matters, and therefore there may be broker non-votes on Proposals 1, 2 and 3.

Q:  Could other matters be decided at the 2021 Annual Meeting?

A:  As of the date of the filing of this Proxy Statement, we were not aware of any matters to be raised at the 2021 Annual Meeting other than those referred to in this Proxy Statement. If other matters are properly presented at the 2021 Annual Meeting for consideration, the proxy holders for the 2021 Annual Meeting will have the discretion to vote on those matters for stockholders who have submitted a proxy card.Compensation Committee has primary oversight

Q:  Who is soliciting proxiesover risks associated with compensation policies and what ispractices and the cost?

A:  We are making,Compliance Committee has primary oversight over the Corporate Compliance Program and will bear all expenses incurred in connection with,Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Please refer to the solicitation of proxies. Although we do not currently contemplate doing so, we may engage a proxy solicitation firm to assist us in soliciting proxies,section “Information Regarding Meetings and if we do so we will pay the fees of any such firm. In addition to solicitation by mail, our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies from stockholders by telephone, letter, electronic mail, facsimile or virtually. Following the original mailingCommittees of the Meeting Notice, we will request brokers, custodians, nominees and other record holders to forward their own notice and, upon request, to forward copiesBoard” below for a full description of the Proxy Statementresponsibilities of each Committee and related soliciting materials to persons for whom they hold shares of our common stock and to request authority fortheir role in overseeing the exercise of proxies. In such cases, upon the request of the record holders, we will reimburse such holders for their reasonable expenses.Company’s major risk exposures.

Q:  What should I do if I have questions regarding the 2021 Annual Meeting?

Board of Directors (the “Board”)

•    Stay informed of our risk profile and oversee Enterprise Risk Management program

•    Consider risk in connection with strategic planning and other matters

AuditNominating & Corporate GovernanceCulture & CompensationCompliance

•    Enterprise risks, including but not limited to risks relating to IT use and protection, data governance, privacy, and cybersecurity

•    Independent auditor’s qualifications and independence

•    Financial reporting and processes, including ICFR

•    Environmental, Social and Governance matters

•    Investor engagement and communications

•    Review Board size, composition, function and duties

•    Develop and recommend to the Board the Corporate Governance Guidelines and oversee compliance with the Guidelines

•    Review the risks associated with the Corporation’s compensation policies and practices

•    Oversee an annual review of the Corporation’s risk assessment of its compensation policies and practices for its employees

•    Diversity, equity and inclusion

•    Assess management’s implementation of the Corporate Compliance Program elements

•    Assess adequacy and effectiveness of policies and programs to ensure compliance with laws and regulation

•    Monitor significant external and internal investigations

•    Implementation of Code of Conduct

A:  If you have any questions about the 2021 Annual Meeting or would like additional copies of any of the documents referred to in this Proxy Statement, please call our Investor Relations department at (239) 768-0600.

NeoGenomics Management

NeoGenomics Management advises the Board and its Committees of key risks and the status of ongoing efforts to address

these risks

PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

General

At the 20212022 Annual Meeting, a board of nineseven directors will be elected, each to hold office until the next succeeding annual meeting of stockholders or until such director’s successor shall have been duly elected and qualified (or, if earlier, such director’s removaldeath, resignation or resignation from our Board)removal). Information concerning all director nominees appears below. Although management does not anticipate that any of the persons named below will be unable or unwilling to stand for election, in the event of such an occurrence, proxies may be voted for a substitute designated by the Board.Board, or the Board may reduce the number of directors to be elected at the 2022 Annual Meeting.

Information as to Nominees and Other DirectorsDirector Information

Background information, as of April 15, 2021,the date of this proxy statement, about the Board’s nominees for election, as well as information regarding additional experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led the Board to conclude that the nomineenominees should serve on the Board, is set forth below. Raymond R. Hipp and Steven C. Jones have both decided to not stand for reelection in 2021.

Douglas M. VanOort, age 65. Mr. VanOort has served as the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since October 28, 2009. For seven months prior to October 2009, he served as Chairman of the Board, Executive Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. VanOort was a General Partner with a private equity firm, and a Founding Managing Partner of a venture capital firm. From 1982 through 1999, Mr. VanOort served in various positions at Corning Incorporated (“Corning”) and at its spin-off company, Quest Diagnostics, Inc. (“Quest Diagnostics”). During the period from 1995 through 1999, he served as the Senior Vice President Operations for Quest Diagnostics which was then a $1.5 billion newly formed NYSE-traded Company. During the period of 1989 to 1995, he held senior executive positions at Corning Life Sciences, Inc., including Executive Vice President. Corning Life Sciences Inc. had revenues of approximately $2 billion and was spun-off in a public transaction to create both Quest Diagnostics and Covance, Inc. From 1982 to 1989, Mr. VanOort served in various executive positions at Corning, including Director of Mergers & Acquisitions. Mr. VanOort served as the Chair of the American Clinical Laboratory Association through March 2021 where he previously served as a member of the Board. Mr. VanOort is a graduate of Bentley University.

Mark W. Mallon, age 58. Mr. Mallon has significant healthcare and pharmaceutical experience and a strong track record of success building industry-leading businesses in the U.S. and globally. Mr. Mallon has served as CEO of Ironwood Pharmaceuticals since January 2019. Prior to his role at Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, he spent twenty-four years at AstraZeneca in various roles of increasing scope and responsibility, including serving on the Executive Committee and as Executive Vice President of Global Product and Portfolio Strategy, Medical Affairs and Corporate Affairs from 2016 through January 2019. Prior to this role he held several senior sales and marketing roles at AstraZeneca, including Executive Vice President, International from 2013 through 2017. He started his career in the biopharmaceutical industry in management consulting. Mr. Mallon earned his B.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Pennsylvania and his master’s degree in business administration in marketing and finance from the Wharton School of Business.

Lynn A. Tetrault, age 58.59, Executive Chair of the Board. Ms. Tetrault haswas appointed Executive Chair of the Board effective March 28, 2022. Prior to that time, Ms. Tetrault served as a directornon-executive Chair since June 2015 and was appointedOctober 2021, as Lead Independent Director of the Company infrom July 2020.2020 to October 2021 and as a director since June 2015. She also serves as a non-executivean independent director of Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a position to which she was appointed in December 2020. Ms. Tetrault has more than 25 years of experience in the healthcare sector. She worked from 1993 to 2014 with AstraZeneca PLC, most recently as Executive Vice President of Human Resources and Corporate Affairs from 2007 to 2014. Ms. Tetrault was responsible for all human resources strategy,

talent management, executive compensation and related activities, internal and external communications, government affairs, corporate reputation, and corporate social responsibility for the Company.AstraZeneca. Prior to AstraZeneca Ms. Tetrault practiced healthcare and corporate law for five years at Choate, Hall and Stewart in Boston. Ms. Tetrault is founder and principal of Anahata Leadership, an advisory firm focused on supporting the leadership effectiveness and development of executive women. She is also a Fellow and member of the Advisory Board of Simmons University’s Institute for Inclusive Leadership. She is also a member of the board of Paradigm for Parity, a non-profit organization focused on closing the gender parity gap in corporate leadership. Ms. Tetrault has an undergraduate degreea BA from Princeton University and a J.D.JD from the University of Virginia Law School.

Skills and Qualifications: Lynn Tetrault is a dynamic, seasoned executive in the pharmaceutical industry. Having progressed through numerous senior management roles at Astra Zeneca, she acquired extensive human resource and corporate governance experience at the highest level of that company. As the Company continues to grow, Ms. Tetrault’s experience is helping to shape human resource policies and operations as well as the make-up of the Board and its governance policies, and therefore we believe that Ms. Tetrault is well qualified to serve on our Board.

Bruce K. Crowther, age 68.70, Board Member and Chair of the Culture and Compensation Committee. Mr. Crowther has served as a director since October 2014. Mr. Crowther retired in 2013served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Northwest Community Healthcare where he served for 23 years.years, before retiring in 2013. Northwest Community Healthcare is an award winningaward-winning hospital offering a complete system of care. Mr. Crowther has a B.S. in Biology and an Masters of Business Administration from Virginia Commonwealth University. Mr. Crowther serves on the board of directors of Wintrust Financial Corporation, a public financial holding company and has been a Director of Methode Electronics, Inc., a publicly traded company trading on the NYSE, since 2019. He was previously the ChairmanChair and is currently a Directordirector of the Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation, a not for profit organization committed to conservation education and research. Mr. Crowther has also served on the board of directors of Gray Matter Analytics, Inc., a privately owned company since 2018. Gray Matterthat provides analytical tools to health systems.systems, since 2018. Mr. Crowther has a BS in Biology and an MBA from Virginia Commonwealth University.

Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Crowther has experience in the healthcare industry and a strong knowledge of the hospital market, having served as Chief Executive Officer of a healthcare system for 23 years. We believe Mr. Crowther’s experience in this role allows him to provide insight into how the Company should manage the hospital market. Because of Mr. Crowther’s extensive industry knowledge and his experience serving on the boards of directors of other public companies, we believe Mr. Crowther is well qualified to serve on our Board.

David J. Daly, age 60, Board Member. Mr. Daly has served as a director since November 2021. Mr. Daly currently serves as the President and Chief Operating Officer at Singular Genomics, a novel next generation sequencing and multi-omics technology platform company. Prior to Singular Genomics, from 2019 to 2021, Mr. Daly served as Chief Executive Officer at Thrive Earlier Detection, a liquid biopsy focused cancer screening company that was acquired by Exact Sciences Corporation. During the course of his extensive career in diagnostics, Mr. Daly has also served in key leadership roles at Illumina, where he was Senior Vice President and General Manager of Commercial Operations for the Americas Region; Foundation Medicine where he was Chief Commercial Officer; Life Technologies where he led the oncology business unit; and Clarient, Inc. where he served as Chief Commercial Officer. Mr. Daly has also held positions with Roche Diagnostics and Abbott Laboratories. Mr. Daly holds a BA in Economics from the University of California, Irvine and an MA in Economics from the University of California, Santa Barbara.

Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Daly has spent more than two decades of his clinical diagnostic career in a variety of senior leadership roles. His positions cover a wide variety of business functions in life sciences, including commercial operations, sales, marketing, field service technical support, and field applications. Since February 2021 he has served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Singular Genomics and before that was the Chief Executive Officer of Thrive Early Detection Corp., a cancer detection and diagnostic company, until it was acquired. We believe his experience at both large-scale organizations and fast growing life science start-ups enable Mr. Daly to provide valuable insights on our Board and therefore Mr. Daly is well qualified to serve on our Board.

Dr. Alison L. Hannah, age 60.61, Board Member and Chair of the Compliance Committee. Dr. Hannah has served as a director since June 2015. Dr. Hannah has over 30 years’ experience in the development of investigational cancer chemotherapies. Dr. Hannah presently workscurrently serves as Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer at CytomX Therapeutics, an oncology-focused biopharmaceutical company. Prior to this position she served as a consultant to the pharmaceutical industry, working with over 25 companies over 20 years with a focus on molecularly targeted anti-cancer therapy. Previously, Dr. Hannah worked as Senior Medical Director at SUGEN (working on Sutent and other tyrokine kinase inhibitors) and Quintiles, a global Contract Research Organization.contract research organization. Dr. Hannah has also served on the board of directors of Rigel Pharmaceuticals since May 2021. Dr. Hannah specializes in clinical development strategy and has filed over 30 Investigational New Drug applications for new molecular entities and 8seven successful New Drug Applications (including talazoparib, enzalutamide, defibrotide, carfilzomib, and others). SheDr. Hannah has a bachelor’s degreeBS in biochemistry and immunology from Harvard University and hera medical degree from the University of Saint Andrews. She is a member of ASCO, AACR, ASH, ESMO, SITC, and a Fellow with the Royal Society of Medicine.

Kevin C. Johnson, age 66. Mr. JohnsonSkills and Qualifications: Dr. Hannah has servedsignificant healthcare knowledge having spent over 20 years as a director since October 2010. Mr. Johnson wasconsultant in the field of oncology drug development and has over 30 years of experience working with biopharmaceutical companies. Dr. Hannah presently works as Senior Vice President and Chief ExecutiveMedical Officer for United Allergy Services, a providerat CytomX Therapeutics, an oncology-focused biopharmaceutical company, giving her direct insight into current market dynamics. Dr. Hannah has extensive knowledge of allergythe clinical trials marketplace and we believe she will continue to offer valuable guidance on how the Company should position itself to obtain clinical trials diagnostic testing volumes as the Company continues to grow its revenue in that area. Because of this experience and immunotherapy services, from September 2014 through July 2015. From January 2003 until September 2014 and July 2015knowledge, we believe Dr. Hannah is well qualified to present, Mr. Johnson was retired. From May 1996 until January 2003, Mr. Johnson was Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of DIANON Systems, Inc. (“DIANON”), a publicly-traded cancer diagnostic services company providing anatomic pathology and molecular genetic testing services to physicians nationwide. During that time, DIANON grew annual revenues from approximately $56 million in 1996 to approximately $200 million in 2002. DIANON was sold to Laboratory Corporation of America (NYSE: LH) in January 2003. Prior to joining DIANON in 1996, Mr. Johnson was employed by Quest Diagnostics and Quest’s predecessor, the Life Sciences Division of Corning, for 18 years, and held numerous management and executive level positions.serve on our Board.

Stephen M. Kanovsky, age 58.59, Board Member and Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Kanovsky has served as a director since July 2017. Mr. Kanovsky, who has worked at General Electric since 2012, is General Counsel, Commercial of GE Healthcare, a business unit of General Electric that provides medical technologies and solutions to the global healthcare industry and supports customers in over 100 countriesthroughout the world with a broad range of services and systems, from diagnostic imaging and healthcare IT through to molecular diagnostics and life

sciences. Prior to his service at GE Healthcare, heMr. Kanovsky held numerous roles in several global pharmaceutical companies. Mr. Kanovsky earned his bachelor’s degree from the University of Pennsylvania. He subsequently graduated from Temple University’s School of Pharmacy with a master’s degree in Pharmacology and Temple University’s School of Law with a juris doctorate degree. Mr. Kanovsky also holds a master’s degree in business administrationan MBA from Saint Joseph’s University’s Haub School of Business.

Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Kanovsky has over 25 years of legal experience in the global life sciences and pharmaceutical industry. Through his work at General Electric as General Counsel, Commercial of GE Healthcare, Mr. Kanovsky is able to provide continued knowledge of the life sciences space. He also brings valuable experience to our Board through his prior involvement with Clarient, Inc. (“Clarient”), prior to its acquisition by NeoGenomics in December of 2015. Because of Mr. Kanovsky’s extensive legal background and long term service to the Board, we believe Mr. Kanovsky is well qualified to serve on our Board.

Michael A. Kelly, age 64.65, Board Member and Chair of the Audit Committee. Mr. Kelly has served as a director since July 2020. Mr. Kelly is a former senior executive of Amgen, Inc. and is currently acting as Founder & President of Sentry Hill Partners, LLC, a global life sciences transformation and management consulting business he founded in 2018. Mr. Kelly has more than two decades of executive experience as a senior leader in the life sciences industry serving in various strategic finance and operations positions at Amgen Inc. from 2003 to 2017, most recently as Senior Vice President, Global Business Services and Vice President & CFO, International Commercial Operations. Mr. Kelly has also held positions at Biogen, Tanox and Monsanto Life Sciences. Mr. Kelly is an independent member of the board of directors for publicly traded Amicus Therapeutics, Aprea Therapeutics, Inc., DMC Global, Inc., and Hookipa Pharma, Inc. Mr. Kelly serves on the Council of Advisors and was the former audit committee chairmanchair for Direct Relief, a humanitarian aid organization focused on health outcomes and disaster relief. Mr. Kelly holds a BScBS in business administration from Florida A&M University, concentrating in Finance and Industrial Relations.

Rachel A. Stahler, age 45. Ms. Stahler has served as a director since May 2020. Ms. Stahler is the Chief Information Officer at Organon, a new pharmaceutical company to be created in 2021 through the intended spin-off of Merck’s women’s health, legacy brands,Skills and biosimilars businesses. Ms. Stahler has nearly two decades of global technology experience in the pharmaceutical industry. Previously, Mrs. Stahler was the Chief Information officer for Allergan, a global pharmaceutical leader focused on developing, manufacturing and commercializing branded pharmaceutical, device, biologic, surgical and regenerative medicine products for patients around the world with a focus on four key therapeutic areas: medical aesthetics, eye care, central nervous system and gastroenterology. Ms. Stahler also has experience at a leading CRO / CCO, Syneos Health, where she was Chief Information and Digital officer responsible for designing clinical and commercial systems for customers as an outsourcing leader. Ms. Stahler was also the Chief Information Officer at Optimer Pharmaceuticals and held various senior technology roles at Pfizer. Ms. Stahler holds a B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania and a master’s degree in business administration from Columbia Business School.

Nomination Criteria

The following is a summary of certain experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led the Board to conclude that such person should serve as a director at the time each was nominated. This information supplements the biographical information provided above. Raymond R. Hipp and Steven C. Jones have both decided to not stand for reelection in 2021.

Douglas M. VanOort, Executive Chairman of the Board. Mr. VanOort has significant experience in the laboratory industry, including experience obtained as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and as Senior Vice President Operations for Quest Diagnostics. Mr. VanOort also has significant financial experience, having served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Corning Life Sciences, Inc. and as an Operating Partner with a private equity firm and a Founding Managing Partner of a venture capital firm. Mr. VanOort is an experienced executive officer and manager as illustrated by the above described positions and others included in the biographical information provided above.

Mark W. Mallon, Board Member and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Mallon has significant healthcare and pharmaceutical experience, including experience obtained as CEO of Ironwood

Pharmaceuticals as well as through various roles at Astra Zeneca. He has experience leading a financial transformation to profitability and significantly accelerating the growth of commercial products. Mr. Mallon spent twenty-four years at AstraZeneca where he had a strong track record of success building industry-leading businesses in the U.S. and globally. Mr. Mallon served as executive vice president of global product and portfolio strategy leading global marketing, pricing and market access, medical affairs, and corporate affairs. He also co-chaired the Late-Stage Product Development Committee for AstraZeneca’s $18 billion Bio-Pharmaceutical business. In addition, he led the International Region, managing a growing $6.5 billion business with over 20,000 employees. He launched AstraZeneca’s emerging market strategy and led the expansion and growth of AstraZeneca’s business in China, where it was the second fastest growing major multinational and second largest pharmaceutical company. As EVP of International, he also oversaw $800 million of Oncology products sales, spanning more than 50 countries. As president of AstraZeneca China, chief operating officer of AstraZeneca Japan, vice president of U.S. sales and marketing operations and president of AstraZeneca Italy, Mr. Mallon delivered several best-in-class new product launches.

Lynn A. Tetrault, Lead Director and Chairwoman of the Culture and Compensation Committee. Lynn Tetrault is a dynamic, seasoned executive in the pharmaceutical industry. Having progressed through numerous senior management roles at Astra Zeneca, she acquired extensive human resource and corporate governance experience at the highest level of that company. As the Company continues to grow, Ms. Tetrault’s experience is helping to shape human resource policies and operations as well as the make-up of the board of directors and its governance policies.

Bruce K. Crowther, Board Member and Chairman of the Compliance Committee. Mr. Crowther has experience in the healthcare industry and a strong knowledge of the hospital market having served as Chief Executive Officer of a healthcare system for 23 years. His experience in this role allows him to provide insight into how the Company should manage the hospital market. He also has experience serving on the board of directors of other public companies.

Dr. Alison L. Hannah, Board Member. Dr. Hannah has significant healthcare knowledge having spent over 20 years as a consultant in the field of oncology drug development with over 30 years of experience working with biopharmaceutical companies. Dr. Hannah presently works as Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer at CytomX Therapeutics, an oncology-focused biopharmaceutical company, giving her direct insight into current market dynamics. Dr. Hannah has extensive knowledge of the clinical trials marketplace and we believe she will be able to offer guidance on how the Company should position itself to obtain clinical trials diagnostic testing volumes as the Company continues to grow its revenue in that area.

Kevin C. Johnson, Board Member. Mr. Johnson spent the majority of his career in the laboratory business and was the Chief Executive Officer and President of DIANON before it was sold to Laboratory Corporation of America. His experience as a Chief Executive Officer of a rapidly growing laboratory company operating in a similar niche of our industry enables him to provide significant and valuable insights as to running a laboratory company and strategies we should pursue.

Stephen M. Kanovsky, Board Member and Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Kanovsky has over 25 years of legal experience in the global life sciences and pharmaceutical industry. Through his work at General Electric as General Counsel, Commercial of GE Healthcare, Mr. Kanovsky is able to provide continued knowledge of the life sciences space. He also brings valuable experience to our Board through his prior involvement with Clarient, Inc. (“Clarient”), prior to its acquisition by NeoGenomics in December of 2015.

Michael A. Kelly, Board Member and appointed Chairman of the Audit Committee.Qualifications: Mr. Kelly has more than two decades of executive experience as a senior leader in the life sciences industry serving in various strategic finance and operations positions. We believe Mr. Kelly’s extensive experience managing and growing domestic and international organizations, as well as his track record in finance, operations and building differentiated product companies will beis highly valuable as we continue the pursuit of our long-term growth strategy.strategy, and therefore Mr. Kelly is well qualified to serve on our Board. In addition, Mr. Kelly’s extensive knowledge and background in finance allowqualifies him to serve as a financial expert on the Audit Committee.

Rachel A. Stahler, age 46, Board Member. Ms. Stahler has served as a director since May 2020. Ms. Stahler is the Chief Information Officer at Organon, a pharmaceutical company created in 2021 through the spin-off of Merck’s women’s health, legacy brands, and biosimilars businesses. Ms. Stahler has nearly two decades of global technology experience in the pharmaceutical industry. From February 2019 to June 2020 Mrs. Stahler was the Chief Information Officer for Allergan, a global pharmaceutical leader focused on developing, manufacturing and commercializing branded pharmaceutical, device, biologic, surgical, and regenerative medicine products for patients around the world. Prior to Allergan, from August 2017 to February 2019, Ms. Stahler served as Chief Information and Digital Officer at Syneos Health, a leading CRO / CCO, where she was responsible for designing clinical and commercial systems for customers as an outsourcing leader. Ms. Stahler was also the Chief

Information Officer at Optimer Pharmaceuticals and held various senior technology roles at Pfizer. Ms. Stahler holds a BA from the University of Pennsylvania and an MBA from Columbia Business School.

Skills and Qualifications:Ms. Stahler is an experienced Chief Information Officer, having held several executive positions in the pharmaceutical industry, currentlyincluding at Allergan, a global pharmaceutical leader focused on developing, manufacturing and commercializing branded pharmaceutical, device, biologic, surgical, and regenerative medicine products for patients around the world. We believe Ms. Stahler’s experience in designing clinical and commercial systems and prior senior technology roles will continue to enhance the Company’s information technology policies and operations, as well as the composition and governance of the board of directors.Board, and therefore we believe Ms. Stahler is well qualified to serve on our Board.

Corporate GovernanceDirector Diversity and Expertise

Director Independence. Under the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules, the Board hasWe seek to have a responsibility to make an affirmative determination that those members of its Board that serverepresents diversity, equity and inclusion as independent directorsto experience, gender, race and ethnicity, but we do not have any relationshipsa formal policy with the Company and its businessesrespect to diversity. We also seek to have a Board that would impair their independence. In connection with these determinations, the Board reviews information regarding transactions, relationships and arrangements involving the Company and its businesses and each director that it deems relevant to independence, including those required by the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules.

The Board has determined that eachreflects a range of Ms. Tetrault, Mr. Crowther, Dr. Hannah, Mr. Hipp, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Kanovsky, Mr. Kelly, and Ms. Stahler are independent. The Audit Committee and the Culture and Compensation Committee are each composed entirely of directors who are independent under the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules and the applicable rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

Director Nominations. Our Board has a standing Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Nominating Committee”). The Nominating Committee considers and recommends candidates for election to the Board and nominees for committee memberships and committee chairs.

Director candidates are considered based upon a variety of criteria, including demonstrated business and professionaltalents, ages, skills, and experiences relevant to our business and strategic direction, concern for long-term stockholder interests, personal integrity and sound business judgment. The Nominating Committee seeks men and women from diverse professional backgrounds who combine a broad spectrum of relevant industry and strategic experiencecharacter and expertise, that,particularly in concert, offer usthe areas of leadership, operations, risk management, accounting and our stockholders diversity of opinionfinance, strategic planning and insight in the areas most important to us and our corporate mission, including diversity, equitysufficient to provide sound and inclusionprudent guidance with respect to gender, raceour operations and ethnicity, as set forth in the Company’s Skill Matrix. All director candidates must have time available to devote to the activities of the Board. We also consider the independence of director candidates, including the appearance of any conflict in serving as a director. A director who does not meet all of these criteria may still be considered for nomination to the Board if our independent directors believe that the candidate will make an exceptional contribution to us and our stockholders.interests.

Generally, when evaluating and recommending candidates for election to the Board, the Nominating Committee will conduct candidate interviews, evaluate biographical information and background

Average Tenure of

Directors

4.1 years

Average Age of

Directors

61 years

% of Diverse Directors

(Gender, Racial/Ethnic)

57%

 

Board Diversity Matrix

(as of April 14, 2022)

  
Total Number of Directors 7
     
 

 

 

 

    Female    

 

 

        Male        

 

 

    Non-Binary    

 

Did Not

    Disclose    

Gender

 
Part I: Gender Identity
     
Directors 3 4  
 
Part II: Demographic Background
     
African American or Black  1  
     
Alaskan Native or Native American    
     
Asian    
     
Hispanic or Latinx    
     
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander    
     
White 3 3  
     
Two or More Races or Ethnicities    
     
LGBTQ+    
     
Did not Disclose Demographic Background    

material, and assess the skills and experience of candidates, against selection criteria set forth in the Company’s Skill Matrix in the context of the then-current needs of the Company. In identifying potential director candidates, the Board may also seek input from the executive officers and may also consider recommendations by employees, community leaders, business contacts, third-party search firms, and any other sources deemed appropriate by the Nominating Committee. The Nominating Committee will also consider director candidates recommended by stockholders to stand for election at the annual meeting of stockholders so long as such recommendations are submitted in accordance with the procedures described below under “Stockholder Recommendations for Board Candidates.

Board Leadership Structure. Consistent with the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Board has a policy that allows the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer to be separate or combined and, if they are to be separate, allows Chairman of the Board role to be either selected from among the independent directors or an executive officer. Our Board believes that it should have the flexibility to make these determinations at any given time in the way that it believes best to provide appropriate leadership for the Company at that time. Our Board has reviewed our current Board leadership structure in light of the composition of the Board, the Company’s size, the nature of the Company’s business, the regulatory framework under which the Company operates, and other relevant factors. Considering these factors, through April 2021, the Company determined it was appropriate to have the same individual, Douglas VanOort, serve as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. Beginning on July 16, 2020, Board Member Lynn Tetrault was appointed Lead Independent Director. On April 19, 2021, Mark W. Mallon will become Chief Executive Officer of the Company with Douglas VanOort retiring as Chief Executive Officer, and assuming the role of Executive Chairman of the Board.

Board Role in Risk Oversight.The Board administers its enterprise risk oversight function directly and through the Audit Committee. The Board and the Audit Committee regularly discuss with management the Company’s major risk exposures, including cybersecurity, their potential financial impact on the Company, and the steps taken to monitor, control and mitigate those risks. Please refer to the section “Information Regarding Meetings and Committees of the Board” below for a full description of the responsibilities of each Committee and their role in overseeing the Company’s major risk exposures.
Strategic Competencies Matrix
Competencies / Attributes

Lynn A.

  Tetrault  

Bruce K.

  Crowther  

  David J.  

Daly

Dr. Alison

  L. Hannah  

  Stephen M.  

Kanovsky

  Michael A.  

Kelly

  Rachel A.  

Stahler

Financial (Reporting, Auditing, Internal Controls)

Strategy/Business Development/M&A

Human Resources/Organizational Development

Legal/Governance/Business Conduct

Sales/Marketing

Risk Management

Information Technology

Public Policy/Regulatory Affairs

Information Regarding Meetings and Committees of the Board

The Board. The Board met four times for regular meetings during 2020.2021. All of such meetings were regularly scheduled meetings and telephonic calls were held as needed. In addition the Board held five12 special meetings during 2020.2021. During 2020,2021, each incumbent director attended 75% or more of the Board and applicable committee meetings for the periods during which each such director served. Although not required, directors are invited to attend the annual meetingsmeeting of our stockholders. We held an annual meeting of stockholders on May 28, 2020,27, 2021, which was attended by sixthree of the directors then serving on the Board.

The Board currently has four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate GovernanceCompliance Committee, the Culture and Compensation Committee, and the ComplianceNominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The following istable provides the composition of the committees as of December 31, 2020.2021, and the number of times each committee met in 2021:

 

Director NameAudit
Committee
Nominating
and
Corporate
Governance
Committee
Culture and
Compensation

Committee
Compliance
Committee

Lynn A. Tetrault

(Lead Independent Director)

XX (Chair)

Bruce K. Crowther

XX (Chair)

Dr. Alison L. Hannah

XX

Raymond R. Hipp(1)

X (Chair)X

Kevin C. Johnson

XX

Steven C. Jones(1)

X

Stephen M. Kanovsky

X (Chair)X

Michael A. Kelly

XX

Rachel A. Stahler

XX
 Director Name 

 

 

Audit

    Committee    

 

 

 

    Compliance    

Committee

 

 

 

Culture and

    Compensation    

Committee

 

 

 

    Nominating    

and

Corporate

Governance

Committee

 Lynn A. Tetrault (Board Chair) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Chair 

 

 X
 Bruce K. Crowther 

 

 X 

 

 

 

 

 

 X 

 

 

 

 David J. Daly 

 

 

 

 

 

 X 

 

 X 

 

 

 

 Dr. Alison L. Hannah 

 

 

 

 

 

 Chair 

 

 

 

 

 

 X
 Kevin C. Johnson (1) 

 

 

 

 

 

 X 

 

 X 

 

 

 

 Stephen M. Kanovsky 

 

 

 

 

 

 X 

 

 

 

 

 

 Chair
 Michael A. Kelly 

 

 Chair 

 

 

 

 

 

 X 

 

 

 

 Rachel A. Stahler 

 

 X 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 X
 Number of Meetings Held in 2021 

 

 11 

 

 4 

 

 9 

 

 4

 

(1)

Mr. Hipp and Mr. Jones have both decided to not stand for reelection in 2021.Johnson retired from the Board effective January 17, 2022.

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee functions pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board, a copy of which may be found at our website www.neogenomics.com under the heading Investors. The Audit Committee is appointed by the Board to assist the Board with a variety of matters described in its charter, which include monitoring (1) the quality and integrity of our financial statements, (2) the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, (3) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (4) the Company’s enterprise risks, including but not limited to risks relating to the Company’s information technology use and protection, data governance, privacy, and cybersecurity, and the Company’s strategy to mitigate such risks, (5) the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence, (6) the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm, and (7) working in coordination with the Compliance Committee of the Board, the implementation and effectiveness of the Company’s ethics and compliance program. The formal report of the Audit Committee is set forth beginning on page 1822 of this Proxy Statement. The Audit Committee met fourteen times during 2020.

The Board has determined that Ray Hipp,Michael A. Kelly, who served as the Audit Committee Chair through 2020,2021, was independent and an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined under applicable SEC rules. Ray Hipp

Compliance Committee. The Compliance Committee functions pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board, a copy of which may be found at our website www.neogenomics.com under the heading Investors. The Compliance Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company’s activities in the area of corporate compliance with applicable laws and regulations related to our provision of medical-related services and assessing management’s implementation of the Company’s Corporate Compliance Program, including but not standing for re-election at the 2021 Annual Meeting. The Board has appointed Michael Kelly as the Audit Committee Chair, pending his re-electionlimited to the (1) adequacy and effectiveness of policies and procedures to ensure the Company’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations, (2) organization, responsibilities, plans, results, budget, staffing, and performance of the Company’s Compliance Department, including its independence, authority and reporting obligations, (3) appointment, replacement, reassignment, or dismissal of the Chief Compliance Officer and review of compliance policies, practices, procedures and programs, and management’s responses thereto, (4) monitoring of significant internal and external investigations, (5) monitoring of the Company’s actions in response to applicable legislative, regulatory and legal developments, (6) Company’s Code of Conduct and policies and procedures that guide the Company and employees, (7) appropriate mechanisms for employees to seek guidance to report concerns, including anonymously through the Company’s compliance hotline, and (8) Company’s compliance risk assessment activities and efforts to promote an ethical culture.

Culture and Compensation Committee. The Culture and Compensation Committee functions pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board, a copy of which may be found at our website www.neogenomics.com under the 2021 Annual Meeting.heading Investors. The BoardCulture and Compensation Committee is responsible for discharging the Board’s responsibilities relating to compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, other executive officers, and our directors and has determinedoverall responsibility for approving and evaluating all of our compensation plans, policies and programs as they affect our executive officers. All committee members are independent directors within the meaning of the applicable Nasdaq rules. Specifically, the Culture and Compensation Committee is responsible for (1) setting compensation for Company executive officers and directors, (2) monitoring the Company’s incentive and equity-based compensation plans, (3) succession planning, and (4) organizational culture programs and practices to ensure that Michael Kelly is independentsuch programs are fair and an “audit committee financial expert”appropriate and designed to attract, retain and motivate employees. Such programs include the Company’s diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives and Human Resources policies as such term is defined under applicable SEC rules.practices relate to organizational engagement and effectiveness, employee development programs, fair pay and benefit programs, and equal employment and equal opportunity. The Culture and Compensation Committee may delegate any or all of its responsibilities to a subcommittee or to one or more directors as it deems appropriate, provided that the Culture and Compensation Committee may not delegate any power or authority required by law, regulation or Nasdaq rule to be exercised by the committee as a whole. In addition, the Culture and Compensation

Committee engaged independent compensation consulting firm Willis Towers Watson (“WTW”) in 2021 to advise the Culture and Compensation Committee on peer development, market practices, industry trends, investor views, and benchmark compensation data. In addition, WTW reviewed and provided the Culture and Compensation Committee with an independent perspective of management recommendations. These duties were consistent with those performed in prior years. For the year ending December 31, 2021, aggregate fees for WTW’s consulting services provided to the Culture and Compensation Committee were approximately $352,000. Approximately $314,000 of this aggregate amount was related to review of executive compensation.

The decision to engage this firm as a consultant was made by the Culture and Compensation Committee.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee functions pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board, a copy of which may be found at our website www.neogenomics.com under the heading Investors. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for (1) reviewing and evaluating the size, composition, function, and duties of the Board consistent with its needs; (2) establishing criteria for the selection of candidates to the Board and its committees and identifying individuals qualified to become Board members consistent with such criteria, including the consideration of nominees submitted by stockholders; (3) recommending to the Board, director nominees for election at the next annual or

special meeting of stockholders at which directors are to be elected or to fill any vacancies or newly created directorships that may occur between such meetings; (4) recommending directors for appointment to Board committees; (5) making recommendations to the Board as to determinations of director independence; (6) overseeing the evaluation of the Board; (7) developing and recommending to the Board the Corporate Governance Guidelines for the Company and overseeing compliance with such Guidelines; and (8) monitoring significant developments in the law and practice of corporate governance and of the duties and responsibilities of directors of public companies, including but not limited to overseeing the Company’s environmental, social and governance initiatives and investor engagement and communications. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies and evaluates nominee candidates as described above under “Director Nominations”. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met four times during 2020.

Culture and Compensation Committee. The Culture and Compensation Committee functions pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board, a copy of which may be found at our website www.neogenomics.com under the heading Investors. The CultureInterlocks and Compensation Committee is responsible for discharging the Board’s responsibilities relating to compensationInsider Participation

None of our Chief Executive Officer, other executive officers and ourserves as a member of a board of directors andor compensation committee, or other committee serving an equivalent function, of any other entity that has overall responsibility for approving and evaluating allone or more of its executive officers serving as a member of our compensation plans, policies and programs as they affect our executive officers. All of the members of the committee are independent directors within the meaning of the applicable NASDAQ Stock Market Rules. The Culture and Compensation Committee met five times during 2020.

Specifically, the Culture and Compensation Committee is responsible for (1) setting compensation for Company executive officers and directors, (2) monitoring the Company’s incentive and equity-based compensation plans, (3) succession planning, and (4) organizational culture programs and practices to ensure that such programs are fair and appropriate and designed to attract, retain and motivate employees. Such programs include the Company’s diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives and Human Resources policies and practices relating to organizational engagement and effectiveness, employee development programs, fair pay and benefit programs and equal employment and equal opportunity.

The Culture and Compensation Committee engaged independent compensation consulting firm Willis Towers Watson (“WTW”) in 2020 to advise the Culture and Compensation Committee on peer development, market practices, industry trends, investor views and benchmark compensation data. In addition, WTW reviewed and provided the Culture and Compensation Committee with an independent perspective of management recommendations. These duties were consistent with those performed in prior years. For the year ended December 31, 2020, aggregate fees for WTW’s consulting services provided to the Culture and Compensation Committee were approximately $187,000. Approximately $174,000 of this aggregate amount was related to review of executive compensation.

The decision to engage this firm as a consultant was made byBoard or the Culture and Compensation Committee.

Compliance Committee.Code of Ethics

Our Compliance Committee functions pursuantBoard adopted the Code of Ethics, which is applicable to a written charter adopted by the Board,all of our executives, directors, and employees. The Code of Ethics is available in print to any stockholder that requests a copy of which may be foundby contacting Investor Relations at our corporate headquarters. Our Code of Ethics is also available in the Investors section of our website at www.neogenomics.com. We intend to make any disclosures regarding amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Ethics required under Form 8-K by posting such information on our website.

Policy Against Hedging of Stock

Our insider trading policy prohibits our directors, officers and employees from entering into hedging transactions, including through the heading Investors. The Compliance Committee is responsible for overseeinguse of financial instruments such as prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds, because such transactions may permit a director, officer or employee to continue to own securities obtained through our employee benefit plans or otherwise, but without the Company’s activities infull risks and rewards of ownership. When that occurs the area of corporate compliance with applicable laws and regulations related toindividual may no longer have the same objectives as our provision of medical-related services and assessing management’s implementation of the Company’s Corporate Compliance Program, including but not limited to (1) the adequacy and effectiveness of policies and procedures to ensure the Company’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations, (2) the organization, responsibilities, plans, budget, staffing and performance of the Company’s Compliance Department, including its independence, authority and reporting obligations, (3) the appointment and review of the compliance officer, including the compliance officer’s reports and summaries, (4) theother stockholders.

monitoring of significant internal and external investigations, (5) the monitoring of the Company’s actions in response to applicable legislative, regulatory and legal developments, (6) the Company’s Code of Conduct and policies and procedures that guide the Company and employees, (7) the appropriate mechanisms for employees to seek guidance to report concerns, including anonymously through the Company’s compliance hotline, and (8) the Company’s compliance risk assessment activities and efforts to promote an ethical culture. The Compliance Committee met five times during 2020.

Stockholder Recommendations for Board Candidates

The Board will consider qualified candidates for director that are recommended and properly submitted by stockholders.stockholders in accordance with our Amended and Restated Bylaws (“Bylaws”). Any stockholder may submit in writing a candidate for consideration for each stockholder meeting at which directors are to be elected by no later than the close of business on the 90th day nor earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to the anniversary date of the prior year’s annual meeting, except that if the annual meeting is set for a date that is not within 30 days of such anniversary date, we must receive the notice no later than the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which the date of the annual meeting is first disclosed in a public announcement. Any stockholder recommendations for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee should include the candidate’s name, biographical information and the information required by Section 1.10(e) of our Bylaws. Submissions that meet the current criteria for board membership are forwarded to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for further review and consideration. The Committee will consider a recommendation only if appropriate biographical information and background material is provided on a timely basis, accompanied by a statement as to whether the stockholder or group of stockholders making the recommendation has beneficially owned more than five percent of our common stock for at least one year as of the date that the recommendation is made. To submit a recommendation for a nomination, a stockholder may write to the Board at our principal executive office, Attention: Denise E. Pedulla, Corporate Secretary.

The Committee will evaluate any such candidates by following substantially the same process, and applying substantially the same criteria, as for candidates submitted by Board members, assuming that appropriate biographical and background material is provided for candidates recommended by stockholders and the process for submitting the recommendation is followed.

Stockholder Communications with the Board

Stockholders may, at any time, communicate with any of our directors by mailing a written communication to NeoGenomics, Inc., 12701 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 9,9490 NeoGenomics Way, Fort Myers, Florida 33913,33912, Attention: Denise E. Pedulla, Corporate Secretary. The mailing envelope must contain a clear notation indicating that the enclosed letter is a “Stockholder-Board Communication” or “Stockholder-Director Communication.” All such letters must identify the author as a stockholder, provide evidence of the sender’s stock ownership and clearly state whether the intended recipients are all members of the Board or a particular director or directors. The Corporate Secretary will then forward such correspondence, without editing or alteration, to the Board or to the specified director(s) on or prior to the next scheduled meeting of the Board. The Board will determine the method by which such submission will be reviewed and considered. The Board may also request the submitting stockholder to furnish additional information it may reasonably require or deem necessary to sufficiently review and consider the submission of such stockholder.

Vote Required for Approval

The nineseven nominees receiving the majority of votes cast “FOR” by stockholders virtually or by proxy will be elected. Proposal 1 is a “non-discretionary” or “non-routine” item, meaning that brokerage firms cannot vote shares in their discretion on behalf of a client if the client has not given voting instructions. Accordingly, if you hold your shares in street name and fail to instruct your broker to vote your shares, your shares will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 1.

Board Recommendation

The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the election of each nomineeof the nominees as director in Proposal 1.

PROPOSAL 2—ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION PAID TO OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

General

We are providing our stockholders with the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officers’ compensation as set forth under “Executive and Director Compensation” by casting their vote on Proposal 2. This non-binding, advisory vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers as described in this Proxy Statement.

The Board believes our executive compensation program, which is described in detail in the “Executive“Executive and Director Compensation” section, is designed to balance the goals of attracting and retaining talented executives who are motivated to achieve our annual and long-term strategic goals, while keeping the program affordable and appropriately aligned with stockholder interests. We believe that our executive compensation program accomplishes these goals in a way that is consistent with our purpose and core values, and the long-term interests of the Company and its stockholders. Our equity compensation (which is awarded in the form of stock optionsoption awards and restricted stock) is designed to build executive ownership and align financialthe incentives focusedof our named executives with those of our shareholders and to focus them on the achievement ofachieving our long-term strategic goals (both financial and non-financial).

Although the vote on Proposal 2 regarding the compensation of our named executive officers is not binding, the Board and the Culture and Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and will consider the result of the vote when determining future executive compensation arrangements.

If this proposal is approved, our stockholders will be approving the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20212022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, is hereby approved.

Vote Required for Approval

The compensation paid to our named executive officers will be considered approved if a majority of the votes cast by stockholders virtually or via proxy with respect to this matter are cast in favor of the proposal. Proposal 2 is a “non-discretionary” or “non-routine” item, meaning that brokerage firms cannot vote shares in their discretion on behalf of a client if the client has not given voting instructions. Accordingly, if you hold your shares in street name and fail to instruct your broker to vote your shares for the proposal, your shares will not be counted as votes cast for the proposal and will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 2. Abstentions will have no effect on the outcome of the proposal.

Board Recommendation

The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” Proposal 2.

PROPOSAL 3—SECONDTHIRD AMENDMENT OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED EQUITY INCENTIVEEMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

The Company currently maintains the NeoGenomics, Inc. Amended and Restated Equity IncentiveEmployee Stock Purchase Plan, as most recently amended on April 20, 2018, and subsequently approved byeffective on June 1, 2018 (the “ESPP”).

The ESPP provides employees of the Company and its subsidiaries the opportunity to acquire an ownership interest in the Company through the purchase of Company common stock at a majorityprice below current market prices. Other than the increase in reserved shares described below and the extension of stockholders on May 25, 2017 (the “Equity Incentive Plan”). The Board believes that the Equity Incentive Plan has been effective in attracting and retaining highly-qualified employees and other key contributorsterm of the ESPP until June 2, 2032, the third amendment to the Company’s business,ESPP continues to provide essentially the same substantive terms and thatprovisions as the awards granted under the Equity Incentive Plan have provided an incentive that aligns the economic interests of Plan participants with those of our stockholders. The Culture and Compensation Committee has reviewed the Equity Incentive Plan to determine whether it remains a flexible and effective source of incentive compensation in terms of the number of shares of common stock available for awards and in terms of its design, as well as whether it generally conforms with best practices in today’s business environment.

At December 31, 2020, the Equity Incentive Plan had 1,022,401 shares remaining available for future issuance. In addition, a total of 4,077,832 options and stock awards in aggregate were outstanding, comprised of the following:

3,785,941 stock options (weighted average exercise price of $15.21, and weighted average remaining term of 3.24 years)

291,891 stock awards

Over the past three years, the Company has used options and stock awards judiciously, with a burn rate average of approximately 1.8% (of weighted average basic common shares outstanding) as compared to the Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences industry benchmark of 7.91%.existing ESPP.

The Company has granted awards as follows:

Fiscal Year

  Stock Options Granted      Stock Awards Granted 

2020

   845,120     149,012 

2019

   969,720    230,980

2018

   2,457,102     87,811 

Based on its review, to ensure the Equity Incentive Plan has an adequate number of shares available, the Culture and Compensation Committee recommended that the Equity Incentive Plan be amended to add 6,975,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to the reserve available for new awards.

Accordingly, the Board approved and is recommending that the Company’s stockholders approve the SecondThird Amendment of the Equity Incentive PlanESPP (the “EIP“ESPP Amendment”). Upon approval to (a) increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the ESPP by 1,000,000 shares to 2,500,000 shares and (b) extend the term of the EIP Amendment by the Company’s stockholders, an additional 6,975,000ESPP to, unless sooner terminated in accordance with its terms, June 2, 2032. As of March 31, 2022 there were 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock willreserved under the ESPP, of which approximately 90,000 shares were available for future purchases. Accordingly, if the ESPP Amendment is approved, approximately 1,090,000 shares would be available for issuancefuture purchases. As of March 31, 2022, there were approximately 5,600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock reserved under the Company’s Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan.

Apart from the increase in available shares and the increase in the individual annual award limits, the EIP Amendment does not otherwise materially change the Equity Incentive Plan. If the EIP Amendment is not approved by the Company’s stockholders, the Equity Incentive Plan will remain unchanged and in effect according to its current terms and the Company may continue to grant awards under the Equity Incentive Plan until no more shares are available for issuance.

The material features of the Equity Incentive Plan, as amended by the EIP Amendment,ESPP are summarized below. The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the specific provisions of

the Equity Incentive Plan,ESPP, the full text of which is set forthwas filed as Exhibit 10.50Appendix A to this proxy statement.

Description of the Plan

Administration of the ESPP Our Board has authority to administer, interpret and implement the terms of the ESPP. The Board may delegate its powers under the ESPP to a committee of the Board composed of at least two members, each of whom may qualify as a “non-employee director” for purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, and/or an “outside director” in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Code. References to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K forBoard herein will mean the year ended December 31, 2015, which was filedcommittee as well. The Board will have the discretion to set the terms of each offering in accordance with the SEC on March 15, 2016, by reference to that certain amendment to the equity Incentive Plan approved by the Company’s stockholders on May 25, 2017, the full text of which is set forth as Annex A to the proxy statement filed with the SEC on April 25, 2017, and by reference to the specific provisions of the EIP Amendment, the full text of which is set forth as Annex AESPP, to this Proxy Statement.

Corporate Governance Aspectsdesignate any subsidiaries of the Plan

The Equity Incentive PlanCompany to participate in the ESPP, to make all determinations regarding the ESPP, including eligibility, and otherwise administer the ESPP. Our Board has been designed to include a number of provisions that promote best practices by reinforcing the alignment between equity compensation arrangements for eligible employees and non-employee directors and stockholders’ interests. These provisions include, but are not limited to, the following:

Clawback Policy. In the event of a restatement of our financials due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements under the law, participants will be required to reimburse us for any amounts earned or payable in connection with an award under the Equity Incentive Plan to the extent required by law and any applicable Company policies.

No Evergreen Provision. The Equity Incentive Plan does not contain an “evergreen” feature pursuant to which the shares authorized for issuance under the Plan will be automatically replenished.

Conservative Change in Control Provision. The Equity Incentive Plan does not provide for automatic vesting of awards solely upon a change in controldelegated administration of the Company.

No Discounted Stock Options or Stock Appreciation Rights. Stock options and stock appreciation rights may not be granted under the Equity Incentive Plan with exercise prices lower than the market value of the underlying shares on the grant date.

No Reload Grants. Reload grants, or the granting of stock options conditioned upon delivery of sharesESPP to satisfy the exercise price and/or tax withholding obligation under another stock option, are not permitted under the Equity Incentive Plan.

No Transferability. Equity Incentive Plan awards generally may not be transferred, except by will or the laws of descent and distribution, unless approved by the Culture and Compensation Committee of the Board.

No Automatic Grants. The Equity Incentive Plan does not provide for automatic grants to any participant.

No Repricings Without Stockholder Approval. The Equity Incentive Plan prohibits the repricing of stock options and SARs without prior stockholder approval, with customary exceptions for certain changes in capitalization. This provision applies to both direct repricings (lowering the exercise price or strike price of a stock option or stock appreciation right) as well as indirect repricings (canceling an outstanding stock option or stock appreciation right and granting a replacement stock option or stock appreciation right with a lower exercise price or exchanges or other substitutions for cash or other forms of awards).

No Tax Gross-Ups. The Equity Incentive Plan does not provide for any tax gross-ups.

Multiple Award Types. The Equity Incentive Plan permits the issuance of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, restricted stock awards and other types of equity grants, subject to the share limits of the Equity Incentive Plan. This breadth of award types will enable the Culture and Compensation Committee to tailor awards in light of the accounting, tax and other standards applicable at the time of grant. Historically, these standards have changed over time.

Independent Oversight. The Equity Incentive Plan is administered by the Culture and Compensation Committee, which is comprised of independent board members.

Administration

The Equity Incentive Plan is administered by the Culture and Compensation Committee. SubjectIn this summary, we use the term “our Board” to refer to the express provisionsadministrator of the Equity Incentive Plan,ESPP.

Number of Authorized Shares If the Culture and Compensation Committee has the authority, in its discretion, to interpret the Equity Incentive Plan, establish rules and regulations for the Plan’s operation, select eligible individuals to receive awards and determine the form and amount and other terms and conditionsESPP Amendment is approved, a total of such awards.

Summary2,500,000 shares of Award Terms and Conditions

Awards under the Equity Incentive Plan may include incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, stock bonus awards, deferred stock awards and other stock-based awards.

Stock Options. The Culture and Compensation Committee may grant to an Equity Incentive Plan participant options to purchase our common stock that qualifywill be reserved under the amended ESPP, of which approximately 1,090,000 shares would be available for future purchases under the ESPP, subject to adjustment in the event of any significant change in our capitalization, such as incentivea stock options for purposessplit, a combination or exchange of Code Section 422, options that do not qualify as incentive stock options,shares, or a combination thereof. The termsstock dividend or other distribution. If any option under the ESPP is terminated without having been exercised, the shares of common stock subject to such option will again become available under the ESPP.

Eligibility and conditionsParticipation All of stock option grants, includingour employees generally are eligible to participate in the quantity, price, vesting periods and other conditions on exercise will be determined byESPP. However, the Committee and will be reflected in a written award agreement or notice.

The exercise price for stock options will be determined by the Culture and Compensation Committee in its discretion, butBoard may provide with respect to incentiveany offering that employees will not be eligible to participate in the offering if they are customarily employed by us or any participating subsidiary for less than 20 hours per week or less than five months in any calendar year. As of March 31, 2022,

approximately 2,000 employees were eligible to participate in the ESPP. The Board also may exclude from an offering period highly-compensated employees or employees who have not satisfied a minimum period of employment with us which may not exceed a period of two years. In addition, an employee may not be granted rights to purchase stock optionsunder our ESPP if such employee would:

immediately after any grant of purchase rights, own stock possessing five percent or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of our capital stock; or

hold rights to purchase stock under all of our employee stock purchase plans that would accrue at a rate that exceeds $25,000 worth of our stock for each calendar year.

Offering Periods The ESPP provides for offering periods as short as one month or as long as 27 months. The Board may specify a maximum number of shares of common stock that any participant may purchase during an offering period. During each offering period, participants authorize payroll deductions on an after-tax basis from the participants’ base pay, subject to certain limits.

Exercise of Purchase Rights Amounts deducted and accumulated by the participant are used to purchase shares of our common stock at the end of each offering period. The purchase price of the shares will not be less than 100%85% of the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date when the stock option is granted. Additionally, in the case of incentive stock options granted to a holder of more than 10%first trading day of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stockoffering period or on the datelast day of grant, the exercise price may not be less than 110% of theoffering period, whichever is lower. The fair market value of one share ofour common stock on the date the stock option is granted.

Stock options must be exercised within a period fixed by the Culture and Compensation Committee thatas of March 31, 2022, was $12.15 per share. Participants may not exceed 10 yearswithdraw from the date of grant, except thatparticipation in the case of incentive stock options grantedESPP at any time during an offering period and will be paid their accrued payroll deductions that have not yet been used to a holder of more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock on the date of grant, the exercise period may not exceed five years. The Equity Incentive Plan provides for earlier termination of stock options upon the participant’s termination of service, unless extended by the Culture and Compensation Committee, but in no event may the options be exercised after the scheduled expiration date of the options.

At the Culture and Compensation Committee’s discretion, payment forpurchase shares of common stock on the exercisestock. Participation ends automatically upon termination of stock options may be made in cash, shares of our common stock held by the participant or in any other form of consideration acceptable to the Culture and Compensation Committee (including one or more forms of “cashless” or “net” exercise).employment with us.

Stock Appreciation Rights. The Culture and Compensation Committee may grant to an Equity Incentive Plan participant an award of stock appreciation rights, which entitles the participant to receive, upon its exercise, a payment equal to (a) the excess of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the exercise date over the stock appreciation right exercise price, multiplied by (b) the number of shares of common stock with respect to which the stock appreciation right is exercised. The terms and conditions of awards of stock appreciation rights, including the quantity, price, vesting periods and other conditions on exercise will be determined by the Culture and Compensation Committee and will be reflected in a written award agreement or notice.

The exercise price for a stock appreciation right will be determined by the Culture and Compensation Committee in its discretion, but may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date when the stock appreciation right is granted. Stock appreciation rights must be exercised within a period fixed by the Culture and Compensation Committee that may not exceed 10 years from the date of grant. Upon exercise of a stock appreciation right, payment may be made in cash, shares of our stock or a combination of cash and stock.

Restricted Stock. The Culture and Compensation Committee may grant to an Equity Incentive Plan participant shares of common stock subject to specified restrictions, which we refer to as restricted shares. Restricted shares are subject to forfeiture if the participant does not meet certain conditions such as continued employment over a specified forfeiture period or the attainment of specified performance targets over the forfeiture period. The terms and conditions of restricted share awards are determined by the Culture and Compensation Committee and will be reflected in a written award agreement or notice.

Stock Bonus Awards. The Culture and Compensation Committee may grant to an Equity Incentive Plan participant shares of common stock in the form of a stock bonus award that are not subject to any restrictions or forfeiture requirements. The terms and conditions of stock bonus awards are determined by the Culture and Compensation Committee and will be reflected in a written award agreement or notice.

Deferred Stock Awards. The Culture and Compensation Committee may grant to an Equity Incentive Plan participant deferred stock awards representing the right to receive shares of common stock (or the value of such shares) in the future subject to the achievement of one or more goals relating to the completion of service by the participant and/or the achievement of performance or other objectives. The terms and conditions of deferred stock awards are determined by the Culture and Compensation Committee and will be reflected in a written award agreement or notice.

Other Stock-Based Awards. The Culture and Compensation Committee may grant to an Equity Incentive Plan participant equity-based or equity-related awards, referred to as other stock-based awards, other than options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, stock bonus awards or deferred stock awards. Such awards may include restricted stock units, stock purchase rights, phantom stock arrangements or awards valued in whole or in part by reference to our common stock. The terms and conditions of each other stock-based award will be determined by the Culture and Compensation Committee and will be reflected in a written award agreement or notice. Payment under any other stock-based awards will be made in common stock or cash, as determined by the Culture and Compensation Committee.

Effect of a Change in Control or Similar Corporate Transactions

In the event of a merger, reorganization or consolidation between NeoGenomics and another person or entity (other than an affiliate) resulting in our stockholders prior to the transaction holding less than a majority of the outstanding voting stock of the surviving entity immediately after the transaction, or in the event of a sale of all or substantially all the assets of the Company or a merger or consolidation or other corporate transaction, the surviving or acquiring corporation shall assume outstanding rights under the ESPP or, in the event any surviving or acquiring corporation refuses to assume such rights, then as determined by the Board, such rights may continue in full force and effect, the applicable offering may be terminated and accumulated payroll deductions refunded to the participants or the participants’ accumulated payroll deductions may be used to purchase shares prior to such transaction.

Amendment and Termination The Board in its discretion may amend, suspend or terminate the ESPP at any time. Unless sooner terminated the Plan will terminate at the earlier of the time that all of the shares reserved under the ESPP have been issued under the terms of the ESPP or June 2, 2032. Notwithstanding the foregoing no amendment or termination may adversely affect any outstanding rights to purchase stock under our assets, outstandingESPP.

New Plan Benefits Because awards to employees under the ESPP are based on voluntary contributions in amounts determined by the participant, the benefits and amounts that will be subject toreceived or allocated under the specific terms as may be set forth in the applicable award agreement, which may include assumption or substitution of such awards with equivalent awards, accelerated vesting or settlement in cash or cash equivalents. Beginning with awards granted after April 20, 2017, award agreements have included “double trigger” vesting conditions. Under these conditions, stock option awards thatESPP are assumed or replaced as a result of a change in control will not automatically vestdeterminable at this time. Future purchase prices are not determinable because they are based upon the change in control. Accelerated vestinglesser of awards is permitted upon a change in control (as defined in(a) the award agreement) if an employee experiences an involuntary termination (either by the Company without cause or by the employee for good reason, as defined in the award agreement) within 12 months after the change in control transaction.

Eligibility and Limitation on Awards

The Culture and Compensation Committee may grant awards under the Equity Incentive Plan to any employee, non-employee director or consultant of ours or any of our participating subsidiaries. While the selection of Equity Incentive Plan participants is within the discretion of the Culture and Compensation Committee, it is currently expected that participants will be primarily officers and key senior level employees, as well as our non-employee directors. As of the date of the filing of this Proxy Statement, all of our approximately 1,750 employees, and each of our nine non-employee directors, are eligible to participate in the Equity Incentive Plan.

The maximum amount of awards that can be granted under the Equity Incentive Plan to a single participant in any 12-month period in the form of stock options or stock appreciation rights is being increased by the EIP amendment from 1,000,000 shares to 2,000,000 shares.

Shares Subject to the Equity Incentive Plan

The numberfair market value of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance for awards underat the Equity Incentive Plan, beforebeginning of each applicable offering date; or (b) the approvalfair market value of the proposed EIP Amendment, was 18,700,000, of which approximately 1,000,000 shares remain available for new awards. The Board has authorized pursuant to the EIP Amendment, subject to stockholder approval, an additional 6,975,000 shares of our common stock to be available for new awards underon the Equity Incentive Plan, so that the aggregate number of shares reserved for issuance under the Equity Incentive Plan will be 25,625,000, with approximately 8,000,000 shares being available for new awards. All such shares of common stock available for issuance under the Equity Incentive Plan shall be available for issuance as incentive stock options.purchase date.

Shares of common stock underlying awards granted under the Equity Incentive Plan that expire or are forfeited or terminated for any reason (as a result, for example, of the lapse of stock options or forfeiture of restricted shares), as well as any shares underlying an award that is settled in cash rather than stock, will be available for future grants under the Equity Incentive Plan. In addition, shares of stock that are surrendered to or withheld by us in payment or satisfaction of the exercise price of an award or any tax withholding obligation with respect to an award will be available for future grants. Shares to be issued under the Equity Incentive Plan will be authorized but unissued shares of common stock or shares of stock reacquired by us.Federal Income Tax Considerations

Anti-Dilution Protections

In the event of a change in the outstanding shares of our common stock, without the receipt by us of consideration, by reason of a stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split or distribution, recapitalization, merger, reorganization, reclassification, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination of shares, exchange of shares or other similar event, the Culture and Compensation Committee will make appropriate and equitable adjustments to (a) the number and kind of shares of stock available under the Equity Incentive Plan, (b) the number and kind of shares of stock subject to outstanding Equity Incentive Plan awards, (c) the per-share exercise or other purchase price under any outstanding Equity Incentive Plan award and (d) the annual award or other maximum award limits applicable under the Equity Incentive Plan.

Clawback Provisions

The Equity Incentive Plan provides that in the event of a restatement of our financials due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements under the law, a participant will be required to reimburse us for any amounts earned or payable in connection with an award under the Equity Incentive Plan to the extent required by law and any applicable Company policies.THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION ADDRESSES ONLY THE GENERAL FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES UNDER THE PLAN. IT DOES NOT ADDRESS THE IMPACT OF STATE AND LOCAL TAXES, THE FEDERAL ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX OR SECURITIES LAWS RESTRICTIONS, AND IS INTENDED FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY.

No RepricingsIt is the intention of Options or SARsthe Company to have the ESPP qualify as an “Employee Stock Purchase Plan” under Section 423 of the Code. The provisions of the ESPP, accordingly, shall be construed so as to extend and limit participation in a manner consistent with the requirements of that Section of the Code. The Company believes that the following federal income consequences normally will apply with respect to the ESPP.

The Equity Incentive Plan prohibits the repricing of stock options and stock appreciation rights without the approval of our stockholders. This provision applies to both direct repricings (lowering the exercise price or strike price ofpayroll deductions withheld from a stock option or stock appreciation right) as well as indirect repricings (canceling an outstanding stock option or stock appreciation right and granting a replacement stock option or stock appreciation right with a lower exercise price or strike price or exchange for cash or other forms of awards).

Amendment and Termination

The Board may suspend, terminate, modify or amend the Equity Incentive Plan, provided that any amendment that would (a) increase the aggregate number of shares of stock that may be issuedparticipant’s pay under the Equity Incentive Plan, (b) change the method of determining the exercise price of option awards or (c) materially modify the eligibility requirements for the Equity Incentive Plan,ESPP will be subjecttaxable income to the approval of our stockholders, except for modifications or adjustments relating to the anti-dilution protection described above.

In addition, no suspension, termination, modification or amendment of the Equity Incentive Plan may terminate a participant’s existing award or materiallyparticipant and adversely affect a participant’s rights under such award withoutmust be included in the participant’s consent. However, these provisions do not limit the board’s authority to amend or revise the Equity Incentive Plan to comply with applicable laws or governmental regulations.

Federal Income Tax Consequences

THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE ISSUANCE AND EXERCISE OF AWARDS UNDER THE PLAN GENERALLY ARE AS DESCRIBED BELOW. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE AWARDS, AND WE ENCOURAGE PARTICIPANTS TO CONSULT WITH THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE TAX CONSEQUENCES INHERENT IN THE OWNERSHIP OR EXERCISE OF THEIR AWARDS, AND THE OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF ANY UNDERLYING SECURITIES. TAX CONSEQUENCES FOR ANY PARTICULAR INDIVIDUAL OR UNDER STATE OR NON-U.S. TAX LAWS MAY BE DIFFERENT.

Incentive Stock Options. A participant who is granted an incentive stock option generally will not recognize any taxablegross income for federal income tax purposes in the year which such amounts otherwise would have been received.

A participant will not be required to recognize any income for federal income tax purposes either at the time the participant is granted an option (which will be on either the grant or exercisefirst day of the incentive stock option (except for AMT purposes, as described below). If the participant disposesoffering period) or by virtue of the shares purchased pursuant to the incentive stock option more than two years after the date of grant and more than one year after the exercise of the option (which will take place on the last day of such offering period). The federal income tax consequences of a sale or disposition of shares acquired under the ESPP depend in part on the length of time the shares are held by a participant before such sale or disposition. If a participant sells or otherwise disposes of shares acquired under the ESPP (other than any transfer resulting from death) within two years after the first day of the applicable offering period or one year after the shares are acquired (the “Holding Period”), the participant must recognize ordinary compensation income in the year of such disposition in an amount equal to the excess of (i) the fair market value of the shares on the date such shares were acquired over (ii) the price paid for the shares by the participant. The amount of “ordinary” compensation income recognized by the participant (a)will be added to the participant’s basis in such shares for purposes of determining any additional gain or loss realized by the participant on the sale of the shares. Any such additional gain or loss will recognize long-termbe taxed as capital gain or loss, long or short, depending on how long the participant held the shares.

If a participant sells shares acquired under the ESPP after the Holding Period or if the participant dies, the participant or the participant’s estate must include as ordinary compensation income in the case may be,year of sale (or the taxable year ending upon death) an amount equal to the difference betweenlesser of (i) the selling price andexcess of the exercise price; and (b) we will not be entitled to a deduction with respect tofair market value of the shares of stock so issued. Ifon the two year holding period requirements are not met, any gain realized upon disposition will be taxed as ordinary income to the extentfirst day of the lesseroffering period over the option price (determined as if the option had been exercised on the first day of (1)the offering period), or (ii) the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercisesale of the shares or on the date of death over the exercise price and (2)paid for the gain onshares by the sale. Also in that case, we will be entitled to a deductionparticipant. Except in the yearcase of disposition in ana transfer as a result of death, the amount equal to theof ordinary income recognized by the participant.participant will be added to the participant’s basis in such shares. Any additional gain realized upon the sale in excess of such basis will be taxed as short-term ora long-term capital gain depending upon the actual holding period for the stock. A sale for less than the exercise price results in again. Any loss realized will be treated as long-term capital loss.

The excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise over the exercise price is includable in the participant’s income for alternative minimum tax purposes whether or not the statutory two year holding period requirements are met.

Nonqualified Stock Options. A participant who is granted a nonqualified stock option under the Equity Incentive Plan generallyCompany will not recognizereceive any income for federal income tax purposes on the grantdeduction as a result of the option. Generally, on the exercise of the option, the participant will recognize taxable ordinary income equal to the excess of the fair market value of theissuing shares on the exercise date over the option price for the shares. We generally will be entitled to a deduction on the date of exercise in an amount equal to the ordinary income recognized by the participant. Upon disposition of the shares purchased pursuant to the stock option, the participant will recognize long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, as the case may be, equal to the difference between the amount realized on such disposition and the basis for such shares, which basis includes the amount previously recognized by the participant as ordinary income.

Stock Appreciation Rights. A participant who is granted stock appreciation rights generally will not recognize any taxable income on the receipt of the award. Upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right, (a) the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the amount received (the increase in the fair market value of one share of our stock from the date of grant of the award to the date of exercise multiplied by the number of sharesESPP except, subject to the award), and (b) we will be entitled to a deduction on the date of exercise in an amount equal to the ordinary income recognized by the participant.

Restricted Stock. A participant generally will not recognize any taxable income on the grant date of an award of restricted shares, but will be taxed at ordinary income rates on the fair market value of any restricted shares as of the date that the restrictions lapse, unless the participant, within 30 days after transfer of such restricted shares to the participant, elects under Code Section 83(b) to include in income the fair market value of the restricted shares as of the date of such transfer. We generally will be entitled to a corresponding deduction. Any disposition of shares after the restrictions lapse will be subject to the regular rules governing long-term and short-term capital gains and losses, with the basis for this purpose equal to the fair market value of the shares at the end of the restricted period (or on the date of the transfer of the restricted shares, if the employee elects to be taxed on the fair market value upon such transfer). To the extent dividends are payable during the restricted periodlimitations under the applicable award agreement, any such dividends will be taxable to the participant at ordinary income tax rates and will be deductible by us unless the participant has elected to be taxed on the fair market value of the restricted shares upon transfer, in which case they will thereafter be taxable to the participant as dividends and will not be deductible by us.

Deferred Stock Awards. A participant generally will not recognize taxable income upon grant of a deferred stock award, and we will not be entitled to a deduction until the lapse of the applicable restrictions. Upon the lapse of the restrictions and the issuance of the underlying shares or settlement of the award, the participant will recognize ordinary taxable income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the common stock or other value received, and we generally will be entitled to a deduction in the same amount. Any disposition of shares after restrictions lapse will be subject to the regular rules governing long-term and short-term capital gains and losses, with the basis for this purpose equal to the fair market value of the shares at the end of the restricted period.

Stock Bonus Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards. A participant generally will not recognize taxable income upon the grant of stock bonus awards or other stock-based awards under the Equity Incentive Plan unless and until the conditions and requirements for the grants have been satisfied and the payment determined. Once subject to tax, any cash received and the fair market value of any common stock received generally will constitute ordinary income to the participant. We generally will be entitled to a deduction in the same amount.

Internal Revenue Code, Section 162(m). Because we are a public company, special rules limit the deductibility of compensation paid to any “covered employee”. A covered employee is generally defined as the principal executive officer or principal financial officer at any time during the year, or any individual

acting in such a capacity, and the three other most highly compensated executive officers. An employee that was considered a covered employee after 2016 will always be considered a covered employee even if he or she is no longer the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, or one of the three other most highly compensated executive officers during the applicable year. Under Code Section 162(m), the annual compensation paid to each of these executives may not be deductible to the extent that it exceeds $1 million. The limitation on deductions does not apply, however,a participant is required to qualified “performance-based compensation” under an arrangement that was in effect on November 2, 2017. Certain awards underinclude as ordinary income amounts arising upon the Equity Incentive Plan that were granted onsale or before November 2, 2017, including stock options, stock appreciation rights and stock-based performance awards, may constitute qualified performance-based compensation and,disposition of such shares as such, would be exempt from the $1 million limitation on deductible compensation. The Culture and Compensation Committee may choose to grant awards under the Equity Compensation Plan that are not deductible under Code Section 162(m).discussed above.

New Plan Benefits

Because awards under the Equity Incentive Plan are discretionary, awards are generally not determinable at this time.

Effective Date

The EIPThird Amendment of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan will be effective as of the date approved by our stockholders. The Equity Incentive Plan is scheduled to expire on October 15, 2025, unless terminated earlier by the Board.

Vote Required for Approval

The EIPESPP Amendment will be approved if a majority of the votes cast by stockholders in person or via proxy with respect to this matter are cast in favor of the proposal. If the stockholders do not approve the ESPP Amendment, it will not be implemented, but the Company reserves the right to adopt such other compensation plans and programs as it deems appropriate and in the best interests of the

Company and our stockholders. The proposal to approve the EIPESPP Amendment is a “non-discretionary” or “non-routine” item, meaning that brokerage firms cannot vote shares in their discretion on behalf of a client if the client has not given voting instructions. Accordingly, if you hold your shares in street name and fail to instruct your broker to vote your shares for the proposal, your shares will not be counted as votes cast for the proposal and will have no effect on the outcome of this Proposal 2. If the stockholders do not approve the EIP Amendment, it will not be implemented, but we reserve the right to adopt such other compensation plans and programs as we deem appropriate and in the best interests of NeoGenomics and its stockholders.3.

Board Recommendation

The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” Proposal 3.

PROPOSAL 4—RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

TheOn February 15, 2022, the Audit Committee of the Board appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP, on March 15, 2021 to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021.2022.

Although ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm is not required by our Amended and Restated Bylaws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP to our stockholders for ratification because we value the views of our stockholders. In the event that stockholders fail to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Audit Committee will review its future selection of its independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the appointment is ratified the ratification is not binding and the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of our Company and our stockholders.

Representatives from Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the virtual 20212022 Annual Meeting.

Vote Required for ApprovalIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees

The ratificationSummarized below is the aggregate amount of various professional fees billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP, for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.

  2021   

 

 2020 

  Audit fees

  $3,162,128   

 

 $1,455,725  

  Audit related fees

  275,168   

 

  95,356  

  Tax fees

  —   

 

  —  

  All other fees

  3,790   

 

  9,755  
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

  Total

  $        3,441,086   

 

 $        1,560,836  
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Audit Fees. Amounts include fees to audit and review the Company’s annual and quarterly reports filed with the SEC, as well as regulatory filings. For the year ended December 31, 2021, fees also include amounts related to the audit procedures over the purchase accounting valuations of the acquisitions of Trapelo Health and Inivata Limited, the regulatory matter and audit procedures over the implementation of our Oracle enterprise resource planning system (“Oracle”).

Audit Related Fees. Amounts include fees related to stand alone audits of international subsidiaries. For the year ended December 31, 2021, fees also include permissible services related to internal control advisory services for the pre-implementation of Oracle. For the year ended December 31, 2020, fees also include permissible services related to cyber security.

All other fees. Amounts billed for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 primarily relate to accounting research database subscription services and other educational programs.

The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, forincluding the fiscal year ending December 31,estimated fees and other terms of any such engagement. During 2021, will be approved if a majority of the votes castAudit Committee pre-approved all audit and permitted non-audit services provided by stockholders virtually or via proxy with respect to this matter are cast in favor of the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will not be treated as votes cast and will have no impact on the proposal.

Board Recommendation

The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” Proposal 4.Deloitte & Touche LLP.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table provides information, as of December 31, 2020, regarding the number of shares of Company common stock that may be issued under the Company’s equity compensation plans.

Plan Category Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
  warrants and rights 
  Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
 warrants and rights 
  Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
  compensation plans 
   

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:

    

Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (“Equity Incentive Plan”)

  3,785,941 $                    15.21  1,022,401 (a)   

Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”)

     N/A   236,651 (b)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total

  3,785,941 $15.21  1,259,052 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

a.

The Company’s Equity Incentive Plan was amended, restated and subsequently approved by a majority of stockholders on December 21, 2015 and amended and subsequently approved by a majority of stockholders on May 25, 2017. The most recent amendment increased the maximum aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock reserved and available for issuance under the Amended Plan to 18,650,000.

b.

The Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan was amended, restated and subsequently approved by a majority of stockholders on June 6, 2013 and amended and subsequently approved by a majority of stockholders on May 25, 2017 and June 1, 2018. The most recent amendment increased the maximum aggregate number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the Plan to 1,500,000.

Currently, the Company’s Equity Incentive Plan, as amended on May 25, 2017 and the Company’s ESPP, as amended on June 1, 2018, are the only equity compensation plans in effect.

AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS

Audit Committee Report

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” or incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

The Audit Committee operates under a written charter, which has been adopted by the Board. The Audit Committee charter governs the operations of the Audit Committee and sets forth its responsibilities, which include providing assistance to the Board with the monitoring of (1) the quality and integrity of our financial statements, (2) the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, (3) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (4) the Company’s enterprise risks, including but not limited to risks relating to the Company’s information technology use and protection, data governance, privacy, and cybersecurity, and the Company’s strategy to mitigate such risks, (5) the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence, (6) the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm, and (7) working in coordination with the Compliance Committee of the Board, the implementation and effectiveness of the Company’s ethics and compliance program. It is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the Company’s financial statements and disclosures are complete, accurate and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and applicable rules and regulations. These responsibilities rest with management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. In fulfilling its responsibilities the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year endedending December 31, 20202021, with management and Deloitte & Touche LLP.

The Audit Committee has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board “PCAOB”. In addition, the Committee has received during the past fiscal year the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP its independence from the Company and its management.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements for the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20202021, be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedending December 31, 20202021, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.

MEMBERS OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

Raymond R. HippMichael A. Kelly (Chair)

Bruce K. Crowther

Michael A. Kelly

Rachel A. Stahler

Vote Required for Approval

The ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2022, will be approved if a majority of the votes cast by stockholders virtually or via proxy with respect to this matter are cast in favor of the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will not be treated as votes cast and will have no impact on the proposal.

Board Recommendation

The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” Proposal 4.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

Executive Officer  Age  Position

Douglas M. VanOort  Lynn A. Tetrault (1)

  6559  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerChair

Mark W. Mallon   William B. Bonello(1) (2)

  58Chief Executive Officer

Kathryn B. McKenzie

3657  Chief Financial Officer

Denise E. Pedulla

61General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Robert J. Shovlin

50President, Clinical Services

George A. Cardoza

59President, Pharma Services

William B. Bonello

56President, Informatics

Douglas M. Brown

  5152  Chief Strategy and Corporate Development Officer

Cynthia J. Dieter

  4647  Chief Accounting Officer and Controller

Jennifer M. Balliet

43Chief Culture Officer

Dr. Lawrence M. WeissClive D. Morris

  6451  Chief Medical OfficerPresident, Inivata

Stephanie K. Bywater  Dr. David B. Sholehvar(3)

  5054  Chief Compliance OfficerPresident, Clinical Services

Marcus B. Silva  Gina M. Wallar

  4547  Chief Marketing OfficerPresident, Pharma Services

(1)Effective April 19, 2021,March 28, 2022, in connection with Mr. VanOort will retireMallon stepping down as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and will transition to becomeMs. Tetrault was appointed Executive Chairman of the Board. Mr. Mallon will becomeChair. In such role, Ms. Tetrault functions as the Company’s CEO and will joinprincipal executive officer.

(2) Effective January 1, 2022, Mr. Bonello was appointed the Board at that time.Company’s Chief Financial Officer.

(3) Effective March 14, 2022, Dr. Sholehvar was appointed the Company’s President of Clinical Services.

Non-Director Executive Officers

Background information, as of April 15, 2021 about ourthe date of this proxy statement, for executive officers who are not nominees for election as directors is set forth below.below:

KathrynWilliam B. McKenzieBonello

Chief Financial Officer

Ms. McKenzie was appointed Chief Financial Officer in February 2020. Prior to this appointment she served as Vice President of Finance and Chief Accounting Officer since October 2017. She also served as the Company’s Principal Financial Officer since August 2019. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. McKenzie served at Chico’s FAS, Inc. in various roles including Assistant Controller and Director of Financial Reporting and Treasury. Ms. McKenzie also previously served as Audit Manager for Ernst and Young. Ms. McKenzie is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a Master’s of Science in Accountancy from the University of North Carolina Wilmington.

Denise E. Pedulla

General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Ms. Pedulla joined NeoGenomics in 2015 as the Company’s General Counsel. From 2011 to 2015, Ms. Pedulla served as a Principal at Berkeley Research Group in its Compliance and Regulatory Risk Management services division and was engaged in private law practice. Prior to that, from 2008 to 2011, Ms. Pedulla was the Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer at Orthofix International NV, a global orthopedic medical device company. From 2000 to 2008, Ms. Pedulla, a health care lawyer, was engaged in private law practice and provided legal counsel to hospitals, clinical

laboratories, durable medical equipment suppliers and other health care providers in the areas of fraud and abuse, coverage, billing and reimbursement, regulatory compliance, corporate governance, contracting, and government affairs. From 1996 to 2000, Ms. Pedulla was employed at Fresenius Medical Care North America in positions of increasing responsibility, including Associate General Counsel and Vice President of Compliance, Regulatory and Government Affairs for its clinical laboratory division. Ms. Pedulla received a B.S. in Nursing and Psychology from Boston College, a J.D. from Suffolk Law School, and an M.P.H. in Health Policy and Management from Harvard University. She also holds a Certification in Health Care Compliance (CHC) from the Health Care Compliance Association. Ms. Pedulla is a licensed attorney in Massachusetts and Florida and is a member of the American Health Lawyers Association and the Health Law Sections of the American, Florida, and Massachusetts Bar Associations.

Robert J. Shovlin

President, Clinical Services

Mr. ShovlinBonello has served as the President of our Clinical Services Division since September, 2016. Prior to this, he had served as our Chief GrowthFinancial Officer since the acquisition of Clarient in 2015. From his hire date in October 2014 until the Clarient acquisition, Mr. Shovlin served as the Chief Operating Officer of NeoGenomics. From 2012 until October 2014, Mr. Shovlin served as Chief Development officer for Bostwick Laboratories, a provider of anatomic pathology testing services targeting urologists and other clinicians, where he was responsible for Sales, Marketing, Managed Care, Business Development, and Clinical Trials. From 2005 until 2011, he served in progressively more responsible positions, including President and Chief Executive Officer, for Aureon Biosciences, Inc., a venture-backed diagnostics company focused on developing novel and proprietary prostate cancer tests. Mr. Shovlin also served as Executive Director for Anatomic Pathology and Director of Managed Care for Quest Diagnostics from 2003 until 2005, and held sales leadership positions at Dianon Systems from 1997 until 2003. Mr. Shovlin served as a Captain, Infantry Officer in the United States Marine Corps from 1992 until 1997 where he served as a Platoon and Company Commander with 1st Battalion 4th Marines and as an Instructor and Staff Platoon Commander at the Basic School. He holds a Bachelor of Science Degree from Pennsylvania State University, and a Masters of Business Administration from Rutgers University.

George A. Cardoza

President, Pharma Services

Mr. Cardoza has served the Company as the President of Pharma Services since March 2018. He has been with NeoGenomics since November 2009, serving as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer through March 2018.January 2022. Prior to that, he was the Chief Financial Officer at Protocol Integrated Direct Marketing. Mr. Cardoza spent fifteen years with Quest Diagnostics, including years when it was still part of Corning Inc. With Corning Inc. he worked with the Corning Life Sciences Division, which did several acquisitions in the Pharma services space. These acquisitions formed the pieces of Covance, which Corning spun out at the same time as Quest in 1996. Mr. Cardoza has worked closely with NeoGenomics Pharmaceutical Services and Clinical Trials division, which was combined into the Clinical Trials arm of Clarient Inc. when it was acquired from General Electric Healthcare in December 2015. Mr. Cardoza received his B.S. from Syracuse University in finance and accounting and has received his M.B.A. from Michigan State University.

William B. Bonello

President, Informatics

Mr. Bonello is President of our Informatics Division. Prior to leading the Informatics Division,this, Mr. Bonello most recently served as President of our Informatics Division and prior to that, our Chief Strategy and Corporate Development Officer helping to formulate the

company’s Company’s growth strategy. Mr. Bonello also recently served as Director of Investor Relations. Prior to joining NeoGenomics in 2017, Mr. Bonello worked as a healthcare equity analyst covering diagnostic services and product stocks at Craig-Hallum and at a variety of firms, and wasfirms. Mr. Bonello also served as the Senior Vice President for Investor Relations at LabCorp. Mr. Bonello received his B.A.BA degree from Carleton College and his Masters of Business AdministrationMBA from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.

Douglas M. Brown

Chief Strategy and Corporate Development Officer

Mr. Brown has served as our Chief Strategy and Corporate Development Officer since February 2020. Prior to joining NeoGenomics, from 2015 to 2020, Mr. Brown was a Senior Managing Director with SVB Leerink with significant expertise in the oncology diagnostic sector. During his career, heMr. Brown has advised clients in over 100 successful M&A and Corporate Financing transactions. Mr. Brown advised General Electric on the sale of Clarient and recently advised NeoGenomics on the acquisition of Genoptix and the oncology assets of Human Longevity. Mr. Brown earnedreceived his MastersBBA from the University of Business AdministrationTexas at Austin and his MBA from the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University and received his undergraduate business degree from the University of Texas at Austin.University.

Cynthia J. Dieter

Chief Accounting Officer and Controller

Ms. Dieter joined NeoGenomics in June 2020 as the Company’s Chief Accounting Officer and Controller. In January 2022, Ms. Dieter’s title changed to Chief Accounting Officer after she appointed a Corporate Controller who reports to her. Prior to joining NeoGenomics, from 2014 to 2020, Ms. Dieter served at Viasat, Inc. as Senior Director, Corporate Accounting. She previously served at DJO Global, Inc. from 2004 to 2014 in various roles, including Vice President and Assistant Corporate Controller, Vice President and Vista Controller, and Director, Financial Reporting and Planning. Ms. Dieter also previously served as Manager of Financial Reporting at Captiva Software and Audit Manager for Ernst and Young. Ms. Dieter is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a Bachelor’s of ScienceBS in Business Administration, with a concentration in Accountancy, from California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo.

Jennifer M. BallietDr. Clive D. Morris

Chief Culture OfficerPresident, Inivata

Ms. BallietDr. Morris joined us as President of Inivata upon the Company’s acquisition of Inivata in June 2021. Dr. Morris was formerly Inivata’s Chief Executive Officer from 2018 to 2021 and prior to that he held various roles at AstraZeneca’s UK strategic R&D sites and global headquarters for over a decade. He has extensive experience across all phases of drug development including seven marketed or close-to-market oncology products. Dr. Morris is accredited as a Pharmaceutical Medicine specialist by the UK Royal College of Physicians, has an Executive MBA, and trained as a physician at the University of Manchester.

Dr. David B. Sholehvar

President, Clinical Services

David Sholehvar, M.D. joined us as President, Clinical Services Division, on March 14, 2022. Prior to joining NeoGenomics, Dr. Sholehvar served as Chief Executive Officer for Dynex Technologies, Inc. from 2017 to 2020. He previously served at Quest Diagnostics from 2013 to 2017 in various roles including Vice President and General Manager. From 2012 to 2013 Dr. Sholehvar served as President for the Americas and EMEA for Johnson & Johnson Ortho Clinical Diagnostics and General Manager for two subsidiaries of Johnson & Johnson from 2011 to 2012. From 2007 to 2013 Dr. Sholehvar served at Johnson and Johnson in various roles including Franchise Board Member for Ortho Clinical Diagnostics and VP of Clinical Innovation. From 2003 to 2006 he served as Director of Strategic Accounts at Veridex. Dr. Sholehvar received a BS from the University of Pittsburgh, an MD from Thomas Jefferson University, and an MBA from the Joseph M. Katz Graduate School of Business at the University of Pittsburgh.

Dr. Gina M. Wallar

President, Pharma Services

Dr. Wallar has served as our Chief Culture OfficerPresident of Pharma Services since September 2016. PriorJuly 2021. From 2016 to that,2018 she hadwas Vice President of Sales and Project Management for Pharma Services and most recently Dr. Wallar served as our Senior Vice President of Human Resources since April 2015. Ms. Balliet joined NeoGenomics in 2008 and has steadily increased her responsibilities; she also previously served as Director of Human Resources. Throughout her time with NeoGenomics, she has managed the human resources process as the Company has grown from 100 employees to approximately 1,750 employees. As Chief Culture Officer, Ms. Balliet has responsibility for all areas of our Human Resources including recruiting, training, development, compensation, incentive plans and organizational development. Ms. Balliet received her B.S. degree in Psychology and M.S. degree in Business Management from the University of Florida.

Lawrence M. Weiss, M.D.

Chief Medical Officer

Dr. Weiss has served the Company as Chief Medical Officer since November 2019. Previously, Dr. Weiss served as Chief Scientific Officer since December 2018 and Medical Director and Director of Pathology Services since December 2015. Prior to joining the Company, Dr. Weiss served at Clarient Diagnostic Services, Inc. as a Pathologist and subsequently as Laboratory Director from 2011 through 2016. Dr. Weiss received his B.S. and M.D. summa cum laude from the University of Maryland. He

was previously on the faculty of Stanford Medical School and was Chairman of Pathology at the City of Hope from 1997 to 2011. One of the most published pathologists in the world, Dr. Weiss was the recipient of the Benjamin Castleman Award from the International Academy of Pathology, the Arthur Purdy Stout Award from the APS Society of Surgical Pathologists, and the Ramzi Cotran Award from the United States-Canadian Academy of Pathology.

Stephanie K. Bywater

Chief Compliance Officer

Ms. Bywater has served the Company as the Compliance Officer since May 2017 and was appointed Chief Compliance Officer in March 2018. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Bywater was the Global Compliance Operations & Americas Compliance Officer at Varian Medical Systems Inc., a radiation oncology medical device company. In this role, she was responsible for developing strategy for and overseeing global compliance operations and served as the compliance officer for one of three global regions, with a focus on international anti-corruption and anti-competition laws from 2015 to 2017. Prior to Varian, Ms. Bywater was the Compliance and Privacy Officer for Myriad Genetic Laboratories, where she implemented and provided oversight for programs supporting Anti-kickback Statute, Stark Law, billing and reimbursement, FDA, research, and global data privacy and protection requirements from 2010 to 2015. In addition to her private sector experience, since 2016, Ms. Bywater has served on the Advisory Board for the Center for Genomic Interpretation, a non-profit organization, where she consults and advises on compliance related matters. Ms. Bywater has a Bachelor of Science degree in Healthcare Administration from Northern Illinois University and is a Certified Healthcare Professional (CHP), Certified in Healthcare Privacy (CHP), and a Certified Internal Auditor (CIA).

Marcus B. Silva

Chief Marketing Officer

Mr. Silva has served the Company as Chief Marketing Officer since June 2020. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Silva was the Director of Precision Medicine at Novartis Oncology. In this role, he led Precision Medicine efforts at Novartis resulting in the successful 2019 launch of PIQRAY® (alpelisib) and 2020 launch of TABRECTA (capmatinib). Prior to Novartis, Mr. Silva was with Becton Dickinson (“BD”) where he first led global strategic marketing excellence for their $1B global injection business and later was appointed head of Marketing and Analytics for their $700 million U.S. Diabetes Care business. Prior to BD, Mr. Silva was with Johnson & Johnson’s Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics franchise, where he held various leadership roles within Global Marketing, Strategic Marketing and Regional Marketing, including multiple product and campaign launches.Clinical Division. Prior to this Mr. Silva started his own healthcare company basedappointment, she began her career at NeoGenomics in Southern California that focused on senior care, which he ran for almost 10 years2014 as Director, Scientific Affairs and grew to over 100 employees. Additionally, Mr. Silva began his career as a practicing California plaintiff’s attorney, litigating employment law casesProject Management. Dr. Wallar received her MPH in Southern California. Mr. Silva earned his B.A.Epidemiology and Biostatistics from RutgersBoston University his J.D. from California Western Schooland received her PhD at UCLA in cancer epidemiology.

Compensation of Law, and his Masters of Business Administration from Rutgers Business School, with a focus on Marketing and Pharmaceutical Management.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORSDirectors

Each of our non-employee directors is entitled to receive compensation.compensation for his or her service on the Board. Our Culture and Compensation Committee reviews our non-employee director compensation

program on an annual basis with its independent advisor, including a review of the director compensation programs of our executive compensation peers. Any recommended changes to the program are then presented to the independent members of our Board for their consideration and approval. We aim to provide a competitive compensation program to attract and retain high quality directors. For 2021 planning, we again engaged our independent advisor, WTW, to review market data and competitive information on the compensation for our Directors. Upon review, the Culture and Compensation Committee determined to increase the compensation to our Directors for the year ended December 31, 2020, each eligible non-employee2021. Each independent director received Boardannual compensation of $45,000.$50,000. The Directordirector serving as Lead Independent Director receivesreceived additional annual compensation of $30,000. Effective October 7, 2021, the independent director appointed as Chair of the Board received additional annual compensation of $62,500. In addition, eligible non-employeeindependent directors who serve on committees receivereceived the following compensation:

 

Directors serving as Audit Committee members receivereceived annual compensation of $10,000. The Director serving as chair of the Audit Committee receives additionalreceived annual compensation of $10,000.$20,000.

 

Directors serving as Culture and Compensation Committee members receivereceived annual compensation of $7,500. The Director serving as chair of the Culture and Compensation Committee receives additionalreceived annual compensation of $7,500.$15,000.

 

Directors serving as Compliance Committee members receivereceived annual compensation of $5,000. The Director serving as chair of the Compliance Committee receives additionalreceived annual compensation of $5,000.$10,000.

 

Directors serving as Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee members receivereceived annual compensation of $5,000. The Director serving as chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives additionalreceived annual compensation of $5,000.$10,000.

All directors are entitled to reimbursement of their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for attendance at Board and Committee meetings.

The Board has the discretion to grant equity awards to non-employeeindependent directors as part of their compensation. All committeeBoard members whether member or chair, receivedreceive total annual equity compensation in the amounthaving a grant date fair value of $110,000.$180,000. On May 28, 2020, the members of the Board,June 2, 2021, each independent director, with the exception of Mr. Kelly, wereDaly, was granted 2,6983,081 shares of restricted stock and 3,4483,714 stock options to each non-employee director. Both the stock options and the restricted stock awards vest on May 28, 2021.option awards. Mr. KellyDaly was appointed to the Board effective July 15, 2020. The total dollar valueNovember 10, 2021. Mr. Daly’s equity compensation of $100,600 represents a prorated amount based on the date of his grant and subsequent split between stock awards and option awards is prorated as of this date.appointment. Mr. KellyDaly was granted 1,7821,623 shares of restricted stock and 2,2231,945 stock options. Both the stock options and theoption awards. These restricted stock awards and stock option awards vest on May 28, 2021.June 2, 2022. On October 11, 2021, Ms. Tetrault was appointed non-executive Chair of the Board and was granted additional equity compensation of $50,000, which was comprised of 838 shares of restricted stock and 972 stock option awards. These restricted stock awards and stock option awards vest on October 11, 2022.

The Committee believes the total compensation package for directors the Company offered in 2021 was reasonable, and appropriately aligned the interests of directors with the interests of our shareholders by ensuring directors have an equity stake in our Company.

Share Ownership Guidelines and Share Retention Requirements

NeoGenomics has adopted share ownership guidelines for its directors and executive officers to further align the interests of our senior leaders with those of our stockholders. The guidelines require directors to hold NeoGenomics stock worth a value expressed as a multiple of their annual compensation within five years of the guideline applying to them.

For the purposes of assessing compliance with share ownership guidelines, the following forms of equity interests are taken into account:

shares owned directly (including vested restricted awards); and

unvested restricted stock awards.

The table below summarizes the current share ownership guidelines as well as the current share ownership of our boardindependent Board members as a multiple of base compensation for Board services as of December 31, 2020:2021:

 

Role  Share Ownership Guideline   Current Share Ownership (1)  

 

 

    Share Ownership    

Guideline

  

 

 

    Current Share    

Ownership

Chairman of the Board

  3.0   212.8

Chair of the Board

 

 

 3.0 

 

 14.0

Board Members(1)

  3.0   211.5 

 

 3.0 

 

 21.3

(1) Share ownership calculated as an average of all independent Board Members except the CEOChair of the Board who is shown separately.separately and the Chief Executive Officer who is discussed below.

Directors who are yet to achieve their share ownership amount are required to retain an amount equal to 25% of the net shares received as the result of the exercise, vesting, or payment of any equity awards they have received.awards. If an individual’sa director’s required ownership level amount is not attained by the end of the initial five-year period (or at any time thereafter), they will be required to retain an amount equal to 100% of the net shares received as the result of the exercise, vesting, or payment of any equity awards granted, to them, until the applicable guideline level is achieved. As of December 31, 2020,2021, all board members were either in compliance with the share ownership guidelines.guidelines or not yet required to be in compliance due to their appointment date.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLESDirector Compensation Tables

The following table provides information concerning the compensation of our non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2020:2021. Neither Mr. VanOort nor Mr. Mallon received any compensation for their service as a director during 2021. The compensation they received with respect to their employment with us is included in the Summary Compensation table below.

 

Name

 Fees
Paid
in Cash
 Stock
Awards
(1)
 Option
Awards
(1)
 Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
 Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
 All
Other
Compensation
 Total   

 

 

  Fees Earned or  
Paid in Cash

($)

   

 

 

Stock

      Awards(1)      

($)

   

 

 

Option

      Awards(1)      

($)

   

 

 

        Total        

($)

 

Lynn A. Tetrault

 $  76,250  $  77,000  $  33,000 $              —  $              —  $              —  $  186,250  

 

  97,668  

 

  161,000  

 

  69,000  

 

  327,668 

Bruce K. Crowther

 $70,000  $77,000  $33,000 $  $  $  $180,000 

 

  68,235  

 

  126,000  

 

  54,000  

 

  248,235 

Dr. Alison L. Hannah (2)

 $61,500  $77,000  $33,000  $  $  $  $171,500 

David J. Daly(2)

 

 

    

 

  70,400  

 

  30,200  

 

  100,600 

Raymond R. Hipp

 $72,500  $77,000  $33,000  $  $  $  $182,500 

Dr. Alison L. Hannah(3)

 

 

  61,736  

 

  126,000  

 

  54,000  

 

  241,736 

Raymond R. Hipp(4)

 

 

  47,404  

 

    

 

    

 

  47,404 

Kevin C. Johnson

 $58,125  $77,000  $33,000  $  $  $  $168,125  

 

  60,625  

 

  126,000  

 

  54,000  

 

  240,625 

Steven C. Jones (3)

 $85,363  $77,000  $33,000  $  $  $  $195,363 

Steven C. Jones(4)

 

 

  37,052  

 

    

 

    

 

  37,052 

Stephen M. Kanovsky

 $62,500  $77,000  $33,000  $  $  $  $172,500  

 

  63,125  

 

  126,000  

 

  54,000  

 

  243,125 

Michael A. Kelly (4)

 $13,750  $66,874  $28,660  $  $  $  $109,284 

Michael A. Kelly

 

 

  66,058  

 

  126,000  

 

  54,000  

 

  246,058 

Rachel A. Stahler (5)

 $20,137  $77,000  $33,000  $  $  $  $130,137 

Rachel A. Stahler

 

 

  61,250  

 

  126,000  

 

  54,000  

 

  241,250 

 

 (1)

Amounts shown represent grant date fair value computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, with respect to restricted stock awards (based on the closing price of our common stock on the day prior to the grant

date) and stock optionsoption awards granted to the non-employee directors. The amounts shown disregard the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. Each stock option was granted with an exercise price equal to the closing valueprice of our common stock on the day prior to the grant date. See Item 8,8. Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to our Consolidated Financial Statements of our Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on February 25, 20202022, for a description of the valuation methodology of stock and option awards.

 (2)

Mr. Daly was appointed to the Board effective November 10, 2021. The total dollar value of his 2021 fees earned is computed from this date. The total dollar value of his annual grant and split between restricted stock awards and stock option awards is prorated based on the date of his appointment.

(3)

Includes $4,000$1,640 as compensation for serving on the Scientific Advisory Board in 2020.2021.

(4)

Mr. Hipp and Mr. Jones did not stand for reelection to the Board in 2021.

The aggregate number of unvested shares of restricted stock and stock option awards granted and outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2021, were as follows:

 Name   Shares of Restricted  
Stock
 

Number of Shares

    Underlying Options    

 Lynn A. Tetrault

 3,919 4,686

 Bruce K. Crowther

 3,081 3,714

 David J. Daly

 1,623 1,945

 Dr. Alison L. Hannah

 3,081 3,714

 Kevin C. Johnson(1)

 3,081 3,714

 Stephen M. Kanovsky

 3,081 3,714

 Michael A. Kelly

 3,081 3,714

 Rachel A. Stahler

 3,081 3,714

(1)

Mr. Johnson retired from the Board effective January 17, 2022.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2021 Named Executive Officers

The following individuals were Named Executive Officers in 2021:

 Named Executive Officer  

Title

Date of Appointment

to Current Role

 Douglas M. VanOort(1)

Former Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

October 2009
 Mark W. Mallon(2)

Director and Chief Executive Officer

April 2021
 Kathryn B. McKenzie(3)

Chief Financial Officer

February 2020
 George A. Cardoza(4)

President and Chief Operating Officer, Laboratory Operations

July 2021
 Halley E. Gilbert(5)

Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary

August 2021
 Dr. Clive D. Morris

President, Inivata

June 2021

(1)

Mr. VanOort retired as Chief Executive Officer effective April 19, 2021, resigned as Executive Chair of the Board effective October 7, 2021, and resigned from the Board effective November 10, 2021.

(2)

Effective March 28, 2022, Mr. Mallon stepped down as Chief Executive Officer and resigned from the Board.

 (3)

Includes $23,604 in fees earned for consulting work performed for the Company.Ms. McKenzie served as Chief Financial Officer through December 31, 2021, and was appointed Chief Sustainability and Risk Officer effective January 1, 2022.

 (4) 

Mr. Kelly was appointedCardoza retired as President and Chief Operating Officer, Laboratory Operations effective March 31, 2022. Prior to the Board effective July 15, 2020. The total dollar value of his fees earned aresuch role, Mr. Cardoza served as of this date. The total dollar value of his grant and subsequent split between stock awards and option awards are prorated as of this date.President, Pharma Services since March 2018.

 (5)

Ms. Stahler was appointedGilbert is expected to depart the BoardCompany effective May 28, 2020. The total dollar value of her fees earned are as of this date.April 22, 2022.

The aggregate number of stock awards and stock option awards granted to each of our non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2020 was as follows (in number of shares):

Name     Stock Awards(6)      Stock Option Awards(7) 

Lynn A. Tetrault

    2,698     3,448

Bruce K. Crowther

    2,698     3,448

Dr. Alison L. Hannah

    2,698    3,448

Raymond R. Hipp

    2,698    3,448

Kevin C. Johnson

    2,698    3,448

Steven C. Jones

    2,698    3,448

Stephen M. Kanovsky

    2,698    3,448

Michael A. Kelly (8)(9)

    1,782    2,223

Rachel A. Stahler

    2,698    3,448

(6)

On May 28, 2020, the Company granted each of the directors above, with the exception of Mr. Kelly, 2,698 shares of restricted common stock. Such restricted common stock vests on the anniversary of the grant date so long as the director continues to serve as a member of the Board. The fair market value of each restricted stock grant on the award date was deemed to be $77,000 or $28.54 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock on the day before the grant. This grant was approved by the Culture and Compensation Committee of the Board.

(7)

On May 28, 2020, the Company granted each of the directors above, with the exception of Mr. Kelly, 3,448 stock options with an exercise price of $28.54, which was the closing price of our common stock on the day before the grant. This grant was approved by the Culture and Compensation Committee of the Board. The options vest on the anniversary of the grant date so long as the director continues to serve as a member of the Board.

(8)

On July 30, 2020, the Company granted Mr. Kelly, 1,782 shares of restricted common stock. Such restricted common stock vests on the May 28, 2021 so long as he continues to serve as a member of the Board. The fair market value of each restricted stock grant on the award date was deemed to be $66,874 or $37.53 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock on the day before the grant. This grant was approved by the Culture and Compensation Committee of the Board.

(9)

On July 30, 2020, the Company granted Mr. Kelly, 2,223 stock options with an exercise price of $37.53, which was the closing price of our common stock on the day before the grant. This grant was approved by the Culture and Compensation Committee of the Board. The options vest on May 28, 2021 so long as he continues to serve as a member of the Board.

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Overview and Philosophy

The Culture and Compensation Committee strives to create a compensation structure that supports a pay-for-performance culture and strongly believes that executive compensation should be tied to the performance of the Company and stockholder returns.

Our compensation philosophy is focused on providing our executive officers with compensation and benefits that are competitive and that meet our goals of attracting, retaining and motivating highly skilled management. The levels of compensation we provide should be competitive, reasonable and appropriate for our business needs and circumstances.

Our executive compensation program focuses on both short and long-term results and is composed of three key elements: (1) base salaries, which reflect various factors including market-competitive pay levels, scope of the position, experience, individual performance, and strategic criticality; (2) annual cash incentive opportunities, which reflect Company and individual performance; and (3) longer-term stock-based incentive opportunities under our equity incentive plans,plan, generally in the form of stock optionsoption awards and/or restricted stock grants, which link the interests of senior management with our other stockholders. Equity incentive grants are generally subject to three or four year vesting provisions. Each of our compensation elements is designed to simultaneously fulfill one or more of our core objectives.

Our compensation program is administered under a rigorous process that includes the solicitation by the(1) our Culture and Compensation Committee ofsoliciting the advice of an independent third-party consultant (which reports directly to the Culture and Compensation Committee, not to management) and (2) long-standing,

consistently applied policies with respect to the timing of equity grants, the pricing of stock options,option awards, and the periodic review of peer group practices.

We believe our overall program, and, in particular, our focus on granting long-term awards, is consistent with current best practices in compensation design.

20202021 Performance Highlights

In December 2019,2021 was an eventful year for the Company, which included changes in our executive leadership, the completion of two highly strategic acquisitions, and a novel strainrearticulation of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) was identified and the disease has since spread across the world, including the United States.our strategy which requires near-term investments as we look to deliver on opportunities for future growth. The World Health Organization officially declared COVID-19 a pandemic in early March 2020.The impact from the COVID-19 pandemic and the related disruptions have had a material adverse impact on our results ofcontinued through 2021, affecting operations, volume growth rates and test volumes in 2020.

We have taken significant actions to protect our employees and maintain a safe environment while ensuring continuity of critical oncology testing for cancer patients. Among other actions, we de-densified our laboratories and facilities, adjusted laboratory shifts, provided special bonuses for onsite essential laboratory employees, restricted visitors to facilities, restricted employee travel, implemented an Emergency Paid Time Off policy, provided remote work-environment training and support, and managed our supply chains.

In addition, a $50,000 COVID-19 Employee Emergency Relief Fund was created to provide assistance to those NeoGenomics employees experiencing temporary financial hardships due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Mr. VanOort and Mr. Jones each donated $25,000 to establish this fund.

Importantly, all main laboratory facilities remained open and we maintained uninterrupted continuity of high-quality testing services for clients.volumes. The Company’s top priority remainspriorities remained the health and safety of employees and continued quality and service for all clients with a focus on patient care. All main laboratory facilities remained open during the year and we maintained uninterrupted continuity of high-quality testing services for clients.

Additionally,In January 2021, we responded quickly to the changing economic environment by fortifyingfurther fortified our balance sheet through the completion of $322approximately $743 million net convertible debtnote and equity offerings. We utilized certainused $29.3 million of the net proceeds from thesethe convertible note and equity offerings to retire our outstanding term debtenter into capped call transactions. We intend to use the remaining net proceeds from the offerings for general corporate purposes and/or to acquire or invest in complementary businesses and related interest rate swap agreements. We also responded to national COVID-19 testing needs by bringing up COVID-19 testing capabilities and providing overflow testing services as well as providing COVID-19 testing to our employees free of charge.technologies.

Despite the disruptionIn February 2021, we announced a Chief Executive Officer transition that was completed during the year, wewith Mr. Mallon appointed Chief Executive Officer in April and Mr. VanOort transitioning into an Executive Chair role before resigning in October. Effective March 28, 2022, Mr. Mallon stepped down from his position as Chief Executive Officer. For a description of the payments he received in connection with his termination, see “Employment Agreements and Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.

We remained focused on long-term strategic initiatives as evidenced by the completion of two strategic acquisitions in the acquisitionfirst half of the oncology assets of Human Longevity,year: (1) Intervention Insights, Inc. d/b/a Trapelo Health (“HLI-Oncology”Trapelo”) in La Jolla, California as well as our minority investment, an information technology company focused on precision oncology; and (2) the remaining equity interests in Inivata Limited (“Inivata”). We also expanded our offerings during the year, including the addition of the InVisionFirst®-Lung, a global, commercial stage, liquid biopsy test, NeoLab Solid Tumor Liquid Biopsy testplatform company. The Trapelo acquisition enhances our ability to provide customers clinical decision support to help answer complex questions related to precision oncology biomarker testing and mobile phlebotomy services. We believe that we are well-positionedtreatment options as part of our comprehensive oncology offerings. The Inivata acquisition adds liquid biopsy platform technology, including minimal residual disease testing capabilities, to recover from the effectsour comprehensive portfolio of the COVID-19 pandemiconcology testing solutions.

The Company issued revised full-year guidance for 2021 as our core broad testing menu enables our sales teams to identify opportunities for increasing revenues.

Most compensation decisions related to the year ended December 31, 2020near-term priorities were determined in the first quarter of the 2021 fiscal year, after the evaluation of the Company’s performance and the performance of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers. We believe the compensation of all of our Named Executive Officers for 2020 aligned with both our performance in 2020 and the objectives of our executive compensation policies.

The Culture and Compensation Committee believes that compensation should be tied to the performance of the Company as well as the return to stockholders. Revenue and adjusted EBITDA, shown below, are the primary metrics used in the evaluation of financial performance of the Company.

Measure (in thousands, except for percentages)    2020     2019     % Change from
Prior Year
 

Clinical Services Revenue

  $382,337    $361,161     5.9% 

Pharma Services Revenue

   62,111    47,669    30.3% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total Revenue

  $444,448    $408,830     8.7% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Net Income

  $4,172   $8,006    (47.9)% 

EBITDA (non-GAAP)

  $28,684    $37,629     (23.8)% 

Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP) (1)

  $34,842   $57,217    (39.1)% 

(1) Adjusted EBITDA is defined by NeoGenomics as net income from continuing operations before: (i) interest expense, (ii) tax expense, (iii) depreciation and amortization expense, (iv) non-cash stock-based compensation expense, and, if applicable in a reporting period, (v) acquisition and integration related expenses, (vi) non-cash impairments of intangible assets, (vii) and other significant non-recurring or non-operating (income) or expenses.

Record Revenue for both Clinical and Pharma Segments. Consolidated revenues increased $35.6 million, or 8.7%, year-over-year. Growth in our Clinical Services segment year-over-year, was $21.2 million, or 5.9%. This increase was primarily driven by COVID-19 PCR testing revenue of $27.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. In addition, our Pharma Services backlog of signed contracts has continued to grow from $130.3 million as of December 31, 2019 to $208.9 million as of December 31, 2020.

Fortified the Balance Sheet. In April 2020, the Company completed an equity offering and issuance of convertible debt to increase its cash position given the uncertainties in the market and allow continued strategic investment. The Company utilized a portion of these proceeds to retire its existing term loan and related interest rate swap agreements. The net proceeds of the concurrent offering, following termination of the term loan and related interest rate swap agreement were approximately $221 million.

Continued Strategic Growth through Acquisitions and Partnerships. The Company completed the acquisition of the oncology assets of HLI-Oncology in January 2020, which added whole exome and whole genome sequencing capabilities as well as a state-of-the-art laboratory and experienced team in La Jolla, California. The Company also made a minority investment in Inivata in June 2020, and now serves as its commercial partner to offer its InVisionFirst®-Lung liquid biopsy test.

Execution of Critical Success Factors and Continued Actions to Drive Growth. The Company remains focused on itsinvestments to build a platform for future growth while remaining focused on our key critical success factors. These key critical success factors which include:include maintaining a world-class culture, delivering uncompromising quality, and providing exceptional service and growth.

All of this change has taken place in a macro environment that continues to be heavily impacted by COVID-19, particularly our clinical business, which has generally experienced drops in demand with variant surges outbreak waves. During 2021, consolidated revenues increased $39.9 million, or 9.0%, year-over-year. Growth in our Clinical Services segment year-over-year, was $21.8 million, or 5.7%. Pharma Services revenue increased $18.0 million, or 29.1%. These increases were primarily driven by an increase in clinical testing and growth in our Pharma Services segment, primarily due to an increase in revenue related to research studies and informatics. In addition, our Pharma Services backlog of signed contracts continued to grow to approximately $267 million as of December 31, 2021.

Compensation decisions made by the Culture and Compensation Committee related to executive compensation in 2021 reflected the events noted above as well as the macro environment. As a result, the Culture and Compensation Committee approved certain off-cycle compensation decisions, which are further detailed below. The annual incentive plan outcome related to the year ended December 31, 2021 was determined in the first quarter of 2022, after the evaluation of the Company’s performance and the performance of our executive officers. The Culture and Compensation Committee approved a corporate performance score of 75% of target (the “Corporate Performance Score”), based solely on performance relative to our strategic critical success factors. Payments varied by Named Executive Officer reflecting the individual’s performance objectives and achievements for the year. The Culture and Compensation Committee believes that the compensation of our Named Executive Officers for 2021 aligned with both our performance in 2021 and the objectives of our executive compensation policies.

LOGO

Our executive compensation framework purposefully emphasizes at-risk pay, which is earned based on annual performance objectives and achievements during the year, as it relates to annual bonuses, or the value of which is based on multi-year stock price performance, as it relates to stock options and restricted stock awards. This framework has consistently high levels of support from our shareholders, most recently in 2021 with over 91% of votes cast in favor of our annual advisory ‘say-on-pay’ vote.

Given the events of 2021, the Culture and Compensation Committee made a number of responsive decisions to ensure our executive compensation program continued to reflect our compensation strategy, which seeks to attract, retain, and motivate the highly skilled leaders necessary to create long-term value for our stockholders, and our business strategy. These decisions are summarized below and explained in more detail in the relevant sections of this Compensation Discussion & Analysis.

 Topic

Description

 February 2021

 Approved a

 compensation package

 for the new Chief

 Executive Officer

•   The new Chief Executive Officer was appointed with a compensation package that included a base salary of $725,000, a target bonus opportunity of 100% of salary, a target equity grant value of at least $5.0 million starting in 2022, and up to $600,000 of relocation benefits.

•   To secure Mr. Mallon’s appointment, the Culture and Compensation Committee also approved two equity grants for 2021.

   A buyout equity award with a grant date value of $5.5 million in the form of stock options and restricted shares which vest ratably over four years, to compensate Mr. Mallon for amounts being forfeited with his prior employer.

  ���A one-time performance-based vesting award in the form of equity and/or cash of $5.0 million in 2021. This award was subsequently converted to a time-based award to align with other Named Executive Officer annual equity award grants, as discussed in more detail below.

   The use of equity maximizes the alignment of Mr. Mallon’s interests with those of our shareholders and the rest of the executive team.

 June 2021

 Approved cash awards

 for two Named

 Executive Officers

•   In recognition of their work on the Inivata transaction, the critical roles that they will play in strategy execution over the next 18 months, and to enhance retention, the Culture and Compensation Committee approved cash awards to the Chief Financial Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer, Laboratory Operations (Ms. McKenzie and Mr. Cardoza, respectively).

•   Award opportunities totaled $300,000 and $200,000, respectively, and have or will be earned based on the Inivata transaction, IT transformation, international expansion, and continued service.

 July and December

 2021

 Approved one-time

 equity awards

•   In July 2021, the Culture and Compensation Committee approved one-time, performance-based equity awards in the form of performance stock units (“PSUs”) for the Named Executive Officers and other select senior leaders for several reasons including greater alignment with our strategic priorities, retention of executive leaders through a period of Chief Executive Officer transition, and leadership team and company transition.

•   The performance goals contemplated on approval in June were tied to stretch three-year revenue growth and a minimum level of cumulative three-year EBITDA.

•   In the third quarter of 2021, we revised our priorities to focus on needed investments to strengthen our leadership in oncology diagnostics impacting cancer patients worldwide and to bolster the launch of RaDaR.

•   As a result of this misalignment, in December 2021, the Culture and Compensation Committee determined that the PSUs should be forfeited and replaced with time-vested restricted stock awards. The grant of restricted stock serves to retain our executive team, who will now be focused on the successful execution of our strategic priorities.

•   As mentioned above, the Chief Executive Officer received an award worth $5.0 million which was forfeited upon his termination except for the portion that would have vested as of March 28, 2023. The other Named Executive Officers received awards ranging in value from $1.0 million to $2.0 million. The awards will vest subject to continued employment ratably over three years from the date of grant, starting on the first anniversary in December 2022.

•   The awards are subject to the NEO clawback policy.

 February 2022

 Applied discretion to  modify the

 management incentive

 plan (“MIP”) calculation

 approach

•   The 2021 MIP is subject to performance metrics based on our corporate performance, which comprises financial performance (revenue and adjusted EBITDA) and strategic performance (strategic critical success factors) goals, and individual performance.

•   As evidenced in the changes to our full-year guidance between May and November 2021, the revenue and adjusted EBITDA goals set in the first quarter of 2021, prior to the resurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic, our leadership changes, strategic acquisitions, and the approval of the re-articulated Company strategy, were not a meaningful indicator of 2021 performance.

•   To ensure that Named Executive Officers and other MIP executive participants were not penalized for immediately pursuing actions that aligned with our revised strategic priorities, the Culture and Compensation Committee took the atypical action that the Corporate Performance Score would be based solely on achievements in relation to the Strategic Critical Success Factors described above. This resulted in the Committee approving the Corporate Performance Score of 75% of target which was applied consistently to all MIP executive participants, not just the Named Executive Officers.

•   After individual performance achievements were accounted for, executive MIP payments ranged from 36% to 113% of target. The average executive MIP payout was 61% of target.

The Culture and Compensation Committee believe that these decisions appropriately reflect the significant business achievements of 2021 and provide meaningful retention and alignment to our investment and growth priorities over the next five years. Additional information, as well as details on the compensation practices and policies more generally, are detailed in the balance of the Compensation Discussion & Analysis.

Compensation Design

Compensation Strategy

We believe that having the right management team leading NeoGenomics and our employees globally is critical in our ability to achieve our financial and strategic objectives. Our compensation philosophy is to offeroffers our executive officers compensation and benefits that are competitive and meet our goals of attracting, retaining, and motivating highly skilled management, which is necessary to create long-term value for our stockholders. We believe the levels of compensation we provide should be competitive, reasonable, and appropriate for our business needs and circumstances.

Alignment with NeoGenomics’ Strategy

NeoGenomics is a premier cancer diagnostics and pharma services company serving oncologists, pathologists, pharmaceutical companies, academic centers, and others with innovative diagnostic, prognostic and predictive testing. By providing uncompromising quality, exceptional service, and innovative solutions, we willintend to be the world’s leading cancer testing and information company.

Underpinned by our values of Quality, Integrity, Accountability, Teamwork, and Innovation, we believe that focusing on saving lives by improving patient care will drive profitable growth for our stockholders to the benefit of all our stakeholders.

This vision is reflected in how we have designed our compensation programs with performance metrics that are included in our annual incentive plan that focus on our achievements.

 

Metric

How we Use it

Why it Matters

RevenueMetric

 

Financial metric

(in annual incentive plan)

 How We Use It

Why It Matters
 RevenueFinancial metric        Our vision is to be the world’s leading cancer testing and information company. Increases in revenue through organic growth and execution of strategic opportunities aligns management performance with the achievement of that vision and stockholder value realization.

Adjusted EBITDA

 

Financial metric

(in annual incentive plan)

 

Financial metric

We continue to seek profitable growth in order to achieve outstanding performance for our stockholders. Adjusted EBITDA focuses our management team on balancing the profitability of our ongoing operations with the implementation of strategic initiatives to provide for future growth.

Strategic Critical
 Success Factors

(see details below)

 

Company metric

(in annual incentive plan)

 

Company metric

We believe that a culture of motivated and engaged employees will deliver superior service to our clients, leading to customer satisfaction and retention, which will continue to increase stockholder value. Annual focus areas are established each year to align with our strategic critical success factors of:of maintaining a world-class culture, providing uncompromising quality and delivering exceptional service, and driving innovation and growth. Measurement against the achievement of these focus areas provides for continuous alignment with our common purpose and vision.

Individual
 Performance

 

Individual metric

(in annual incentive plan)

 

Individual metric

Each executive that participates in the management incentive planMIP plays a unique role in the Company’s strategic objectives. Including individual performance goals for each executive that are in line with the executive’s major responsibilities ensures that incentive payments relate to both Company performance as well as individual performance.

Compensation Elements

Our compensation program is purposefully straightforward.aims to retain our executive leaders over the long-term. In accordance with our compensation philosophy we provide competitive fixed cash compensation, an annual incentive program that aligns pay with in-year progress against our longer term goals, and stock options and/or restricted stock awards and stock option awards that provide clear and transparent alignment to sustainable stockholder value creation, while retaining our executives over the long-term.creation. The aggregate value of base salary, target bonusannual incentive and long-term incentives is generally positioned within a competitive range around market median.

The following table summarizes the purpose and key features of each element of compensation.

 

Element

Purpose

Key Features

Element

Purpose

Key Features
Base Salary

 Provide competitive baseline
compensation for role
 

•   Fixed cash compensation

•   Amounts informed by levels in the market, taking account of the role, scope of the position, experience, performance and strategic criticality

•   Target competitive range around market median

 Annual
 Incentive    

Annual Incentive

 Reward for the achievement
of both NeoGenomics’NeoGenomics and
individual performance
during the year
 

•   Variable cash compensation

•   Target opportunity informed by levels in the market

•   Actual value based on financial performance (revenue, adjusted EBITDA) and individually defined critical strategic critical success factors

 Long-Term
 Incentives

Long-Term Incentives

 Align with the long-term
interests of NeoGenomics,
our stockholders and our
employees, while rewarding
long-term sustainable value
creation and driving
retention
 

•   Grants of stock optionsoption awards and restricted stock awards generally made annually to Named Executive Officers and/or grants of restricted stock made periodically to certain Named Executive Officers

•   Variable equity-based compensation

•   Target opportunity informed by levels in the market

•   Options require stock price appreciation to yield value

•   Restricted stock and options have four year ratable vesting and options have a seven-year term

The aggregate valueFrom time-to-time, the Culture and Compensation Committee may approve compensation that extends beyond these core elements. In 2021 the Committee approved one-time performance-based cash payments to two Named Executive Officers, and one-time restricted stock awards to all Named Executive Officers, both of base salary, target bonus and long-term incentives is generally positioned within a competitive range around market median.which are explained in sections below.

As the following charts show, the majority of our CEO’sChief Executive Officer’s and other named executive officers’Named Executive Officers’ compensation for the year ended December 31, 20202021 is variable or performance-based, or granted for retentive purposes. Please refer to the Summary Compensation Table and performance based:the related footnotes for further details regarding the breakout of the Chief Executive Officer’s and other Named Executive Officers’ compensation for the year ended December 31, 2021. Excluded from the charts below are the PSUs granted to certain of our Named Executive Officers in July 2021, which were subsequently forfeited.

 

LOGO

Compensation Best PracticesLOGO

 

Compensation Best Practices
What We Do: 

What We Avoid:
 

Pay for performance

×

No tax gross-ups  on any change-in-control benefits
Deliver majority of executive compensation in the form of at-risk,variable or performance-based pay

×

No hedging or pledging of NeoGenomics stock
Align annual performance objectives with our strategy

×

No excessive perquisites, benefits or pension payments
Conduct annual assessment of CEOChief Executive Officer pay versus performance

×

No reloading or repricing of stock options
Take into consideration the compensation levels of a relevant peer group of companies when setting compensation

  Cap payout opportunities under our incentive plans

  Operate share ownership and retention requirements

  Operate clawback policy

  Operate double-trigger change-in-control benefits

  Operate an annual ‘say on pay’ vote

  Engage an independent compensation consultant

 

×

No optionstax gross-ups on any change-in-control benefits

× No hedging or pledging of NeoGenomics stock

× No excessive perquisites, benefits or pension payments

× No reloading or repricing of stock option awards

× No option grants with an exercise price below 100% of fair market value

Cap payout opportunities under our incentive plans
Operate share ownership and retention requirements
Operate clawback policy
Operate double-trigger change-in-control benefits
Operate an annual ‘say on pay’ vote
Engage an independent compensation consultant

Culture and Compensation Governance

Culture and Compensation OversightOversight; Role of Executive Officers

The Culture and Compensation Committee, chaired by Lynn A. Tetrault and comprised of five totalthree additional independent Directors, is responsible for discharging the Board’s responsibilities relating to compensation of our executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer. The Culture and Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for approving and evaluating all of our compensation plans, policies and programs as they affect our executive officers. This includes reviewing and approving the compensation of the Named Executive Officers, approving performance goals, and reviewing the achievement of performance goals at year end.

In exercising its duties, the Culture and Compensation Committee receives information and support from management and guidance from an independent advisor.

The Culture and Compensation Committee is wholly accountableresponsible for any changes in compensation for the Chief Executive Officer, and the Chief Executive Officer is not included in any discussions regarding changes to his or her own compensation. For other Named Executive Officers recommendations are made by the Chief Executive Officer regarding annual base salary, equity awards, and target bonus increases and are subsequently reviewed and approved by the Culture and Compensation Committee.

The Annual Process

The Culture and Compensation Committee typically meets four times a year to consider the following items:

 

Quarter

 

 

Typical Meeting Topics

 Q1

Q1

 

•   Setting compensation for Company executive officers, including the review and approval of executive benchmarking and pay recommendations, salary adjustments, annual bonus payouts, and long-term incentive award values

•   Approve annual company and individual performance goals for the year ahead

•   Assess compliance versus stock ownership guidelines

•   Review historical equity awards and resulting burn rates

 Q2

Q2

 

•   Review and finalize relevantcompensation discussion and analysis section of the proxy contentstatement

•   Monitoring ofMonitor the Company’s incentive and equity-based compensation plan, including the review and approval of proposed annual equity grants

•   Undertake Culture and Compensation Committee self-evaluation

 Q3

Q3

 

•   Review and discuss proxy advisor reports and any other investor feedback

•   Receive update on legislative, regulatory and governance environments

•   Review current compensation philosophy including organizational culture programs and practices pertaining to diversity, equity and inclusion

•   Review Culture and Compensation Committee charter

 Q4

Q4

 

•   Conduct annual peer group review

•   Discuss potential CD&Acompensation design enhancements and review planning timeline

•   Succession planning

Additional meetings are scheduled on an as needed basis.

Use of an Independent Advisor

As outlined in its Charter,charter, the Culture and Compensation Committee has the authority to select, retain, and/or replace, as needed, compensation and benefits consultants and other outside consultants to provide independent advice to the Culture and Compensation Committee.

InSince 2016 the Culture and Compensation Committee appointed Willis Towers Watson (“WTW”)has retained WTW as an independent outside compensation consultant. During 2020,2021 WTW advised the Culture and Compensation Committee on peer group development, market practices, industry trends, investor views, and benchmark compensation data. In addition, they reviewed and provided the Culture and Compensation Committee with an independent perspective of management recommendations.the Company’s compensation related to its executive officers. These duties were consistent with those performed in prior years.

The Culture and Compensation Committee considered the six independence assessment factors specified byunder the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC Rule 10C-1(b)(4) to monitor the independence of their compensation advisors. As was the case in prior years the Culture and Compensation Committee determined that WTW’s services during 20202021 did not raise a conflict of interest.

Managing Compensation-Related Risks

NeoGenomics operates in a highly regulated, competitive and fast-moving field, meaning that risk management is core to our success. It is the common purpose of all NeoGenomics employees to save lives by improving patient care and this shared common purpose underscores our commitment to performance excellence in a risk-appropriate manner.

The Culture and Compensation Committee’s role relative to risk mitigation is to review the risks associated with NeoGenomics’management’s compensation policies and practices to determine whether any risks associated with such policies and practices encourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking or are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The Culture and Compensation Committee also oversees an annual review of the Corporation’sCompany’s risk assessment of its compensation policies and practices for its employees.

The risk-mitigating features that NeoGenomics has adopted within our executive compensation programs are summarized below.

Clawback

In the event of a restatement of the NeoGenomics’ financial statements due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the law, whether such noncompliance is the result of misconduct or other circumstances, a Participantan employee shall be required to reimburse the Company for any amounts earned or payable with respect to an Awardaward granted under the Company’s equity plan to the extent required by law and any applicable Company policies.

Share Ownership Guidelines and Share Retention Requirements

NeoGenomics has adopted share ownership guidelines to further align the interests of our senior executives with those of our stockholders. The guidelines require executives in covered roles to hold NeoGenomics stock worth a value expressed as a multiple of their salary within five years of the guideline applying to them.

For the purposes of assessing compliance with share ownership guidelines, the following forms of equity interests are taken into account:

shares owned directly (including vested restricted awards); and

unvested restricted stock awards.

The table below summarizescompares the current share ownership guidelines forto the actual share ownership of our Named Executive Officers as a multiple of base salary as of December 31, 2020:2021:

 

Role

  Share Ownership Guideline

 

  Share Ownership(1)  

 

            Share Ownership         
Guideline
          Share  Ownership(1)      

Chief Executive Officer

  3.0  212.8 

 

 3.0 

 

 10.6

Named Executive Officers

  1.0  11.7

Other Named Executive Officers

  1.0  14.3

(1)Share ownership calculated as an average of all Named Executive Officers except for (i) the CEOChief Executive Officer who is shown separately.separately; and (ii) Mr. VanOort, who resigned as Chief Executive Officer in April 2021, and is excluded.

Individuals who are yet to achieve their required ownership amounts are required to retain an amount equal to 25% of the net shares received as the result of the exercise, vesting, or payment of any equity awards they have received. If an individual’s share ownership level is not attained by the end of the initial five-year period (or at any time thereafter), they will be required to retain an amount equal to 100% of the net shares received as the result of the exercise, vesting, or payment of any equity awards granted to them, until the applicable guideline level is achieved. As of December 31, 2020,2021, all Named Executive Officers were either in compliance with the share ownership guidelines or not yet required to be in compliance due to their hire date.

Views of our Stockholders

Starting in 2019, the Company moved to an annual vote on Named Executive Officers’ compensation. This change enables the Culture and Compensation Committee to have more regular insight on stockholder views which inform discussions on program design and disclosure.

In 2020, 96.4%2021 91.7% of the votes cast in our say-on-pay vote were in favor of our annual advisory vote on Named Executive Officers’ compensation. This positive vote and feedback, coupled with alignment of pay and performance under NeoGenomics’

compensation programs, reinforces the Company’s current approach to executive compensation. The outcomesoutcome of thesethe annual advisory votesvote provides regular indicative feedback across our entire shareholder base and will continue to inform the Culture and Compensation Committee’s thinking as it evaluates the appropriateness and effectiveness of NeoGenomics’ approach to executive compensation.

Compensation Peer Group

In evaluating executive compensation the Culture and Compensation Committee considers a number of factors including:

 

Absolute Company performance;

Individual performance;

Company performance relative to our established peer group;

Compensation practices observed in our established peer group; and

Stockholder views.

Given the fast-changing nature of our industry the Culture and Compensation Committee reviews the compensation peer group annually with input from WTW. Consideration is given to relative size (revenue, number of employees and market capitalization) and nature of business (business focus and model) of the organizations.

The Culture and Compensation Committee has consciously chosen to adopt a compensation peer group that is, on the whole,includes certain companies that appear different from the group of companies with which our business competes. This is primarily due to the fact that many of our direct business competitors are either much larger or smaller than us in terms of size and scope, meaning the compensation data would not necessarily be appropriate to inform decision-making regarding executive compensation levels at NeoGenomics.

The 20202021 compensation peer group comprised the following 16 companies:

 

•  10x Genomics, Inc.*

•  AtriCure, Inc.

•  Bio-Techne Corporation

•  Emergent BioSolutions, Inc.

•  Exact Sciences Corporation

•  Guardant Health, Inc.*(1)

 

•  Invitae Corporation

•  Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

•  Luminex Corporation

•  Medpace Holdings, Inc

•  Myriad Genetics, Inc.

•  NanoString Technologies, Inc.

 

•  Natera, Inc.

•  AtriCure, Inc.

•  Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

•  OPKO Health, Inc.

•  Bio-Techne Corporation

•  Luminex Corporation

•  Quidel Corporation

•  Emergent BioSolutions, Inc.

•  Medpace Holdings, Inc

•  Repligen Corporation

•  Exact Sciences Corporation

•  Myriad Genetics, Inc.

•  Guardant Health, Inc. (1)

•  NanoString Technologies, Inc.

* (1) Indicates companies excluded from CEOChief Executive Officer pay vs. performance graph below asbecause three years of stock data is not available.

Peers included in 20202021 met industry selection criteria and fell within the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry and desired ranges for revenue and market capitalization. Relative to the peer group the Company ranked approximately at the median for revenue and market capitalization. While a specific percentile is not targeted the Culture and Compensation Committee will generally reference a competitive range around market median to inform decisions on executive compensation, along with role scope, company and individual performance, role criticality and other relevant factors.

Assessment of the Chief Executive Officer’s Compensation

As noted above one of the Culture and Compensation Committee’s annual activities is to assess the total compensation of the Chief Executive Officer related to our compensation peer group. The peer group used for this purpose is ourconsists of compensation peer group as defined above.

The following graph shows the relationship of Mr. VanOort, our CEO’sformer Chief Executive Officer’s, total compensation as set forth in the 20202021 Summary Compensation Table and the change in stock price for the three years ended December 31, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 20192020 (annualized) as compared to the companies included in our peer group, as defined above. Data for the most recent year ended December 31, 20202021, was not used in this graph as the CEOChief Executive Officer compensation was not available for this period for all companies presented.

LOGO

LOGO2021 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes

The chart below presents the cumulative total return to our stockholders of $100 during the period from December 31, 2016, through December 31, 2021, in comparison to the cumulative return on the S&P 500 Index and a customized group of five publicly traded companies during that same period. These peers fall within our industry and/or are also included in our compensation peer group, as described above. The group is made up of Invitae Corporation, Exact Sciences Corporation, Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Natera, Inc., and Quest Diagnostics, Inc. Several of our closest competitors are part of large pharmaceutical or other multi-national firms, or are privately held and, as such, we are unable to obtain financial information for them.

LOGO

The results assume that $100 (with reinvestment of all dividends) was invested in our common stock, the index, and in the peer group and its relative performance tracked through December 31, 2021. The comparisons are based on historical data and are not indicative of, nor intended to forecast, the future performance of our common stock.

Establishing Performance Targets

Performance targets are set in the first quarter at the time of the Board’s annual budgeting session to ensure that our executives’ compensation opportunities are aligned with our short and long-term strategic goals. The performance targets are designed to reward achievement of specific financial, strategic (referred to as our “Strategic Critical Success Factors”) and individual performance goals. We use an annual performance management process for our executives to assess individual performance, as well as a variety of distinct performance metrics that are shared among the executive team. As part of this process, each executive, including each of our Named Executive Officers, establishes his or her performance goals with input and approval from the CEO.Chief Executive Officer. Shared performance metrics are reviewed and approved by the Culture and Compensation Committee.

2020The Culture and Compensation DecisionsCommittee took the atypical action of basing the Corporate Performance Score under the 2021 MIP solely on the achievements related to our Strategic Critical Success Factors. This reflected the fact that the revenue and Outcomes

The decisions described belowEBITDA goals were set in relationthe first quarter of 2021, prior to 2020 pay levels and outcomes for our Named Executive Officers were made before the full global extentresurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic became apparent. Theand its impact on our business and financial results, our leadership changes, strategic acquisitions, and the approval of the re-articulated Company strategy, resulting in these goals not being a meaningful indicator of 2021 performance. This

enabled the Committee to ensure that payouts under the program appropriately reflected performance across the company and did not penalize participants for immediately pursuing actions that aligned with our revised strategic priorities.

2021 Chief Executive Officer Compensation

In February 2021, the Company announced Mr. Mallon as its new Chief Executive Officer, replacing Mr. VanOort effective April 19, 2021. In connection with his appointment, the Culture and Compensation Committee consideredreviewed competitive market data to inform decisions on Mr. Mallon’s target compensation, also taking into account his prior experience, including most recently as the businessChief Executive Officer at another publicly-traded pharmaceutical company, and financial impact of COVID-19 pandemic to NeoGenomics, our stockholders, our employees, our customers and other stakeholders, in evaluating 2020 performance.

An Overview of Performance in 2020the target compensation associated with that role.

The Culture and Compensation Committee considersapproved the financialfollowing target compensation package:

A base salary of $725,000;

A target bonus opportunity of 100% of salary, with an opportunity to earn up to 200% of target if maximum performance goals are achieved; and

An annual target equity award starting in 2022 of not less than $5.0 million.

In addition, to secure the Company in making compensation decisions. Theappointment of Mr. Mallon the Culture and Compensation Committee believesapproved two equity grants to be made in 2021:

A buyout award made in the form of stock options and restricted stock with a value of $5.5 million, which will vest ratably over the next four years; and

A special one-time performance-based award with a value of $5.0 million.

The buyout award took into account the compensation Mr. Mallon was forfeiting by joining NeoGenomics and was structured to provide immediate alignment with the Company’s shareholders with a multi-year vesting schedule. By its terms, the buyout award vested in connection with Mr. Mallon’s termination. On his termination, Mr. Mallon forfeited the time-vested restricted stock grant that compensation should be tied to the performancewas granted in replacement of the Company as well asperformance-based award described above, other than the returnportion of such award that would have vested by its terms on or prior to stockholders.March 28, 2023.

The primary metrics usedspecial one-time performance-based award was agreed to in the evaluationcontext of financial performanceperformance-based equity awards (in the form of PSUs) being contemplated at the Company are revenue and adjusted EBITDA. Consolidated revenuetime for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $444.4 million, an increase of 8.7% over 2019. Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $34.8 million compared to $57.2 million in 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2020, special considerations related to revenue and adjusted EBITDA were made due to the unique challenges and circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic. The diligent efforts and dedication of the named executive officers were recognizedbroader management team. These PSUs, originally approved by the Culture and Compensation Committee. This resultedCommittee, were subsequently forfeited in weightingDecember 2021. Concurrent with this forfeiture, the senior-level executives who had held the PSUs, as well as certain other executives, were granted time vested restricted stock awards. Further details on these awards for the Named Executive Officers are discussed further below in the section titled “2021 One-Time Incentive Awards.”

Former Chief Executive Officer (Mr. VanOort)

Mr. VanOort’s voluntary resignation on November 10, 2021 did not provide for payment of severance or other termination benefits. However, in recognition of Mr. VanOort’s significant contributions as both the Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, the Culture and Compensation Committee approved the accelerated vesting of all of his outstanding and unvested restricted stock and option awards.

The incremental fair value of the accelerated unvested portions of the restricted stock and option awards, determined under the accounting rules (ASC Topic 718), were $1.7 million and $4.9 million, respectively.

revenue and adjusted EBITDA results with 25% of the weight being placed on the first half of 2020 and 75% on the second half of the year.

These performance achievements in addition to Company and individual goals, resulted in annual incentive awards ranging from 65.9% - 100.0% of target.

We have presented below the cumulative total return to our stockholders of $100 during the period from December 31, 2015, through December 31, 2020 in comparison to the cumulative return on the S&P 500 Index and a customized peer group of five publicly traded companies during that same period. The peer group is made up of Invitae Corporation, Exact Sciences Corporation, Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Natera, Inc., and Quest Diagnostics, Inc. Several of our closest competitors are part of large pharmaceutical or other multi-national firms, or are privately held and, as such, we are unable to obtain financial information for them.

LOGO

The results assume that $100 (with reinvestment of all dividends) was invested in our common stock, the index and in the peer group and its relative performance tracked through December 31, 2020. The comparisons are based on historical data and are not indicative of, nor intended to forecast, the future performance of our common stock.

Our Named Executive Officers in 2020

The following individuals were Named Executive Officers in 2020.

Named Executive OfficerTitle

Date of Appointment

to Current Role

Douglas M. VanOort

Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerOctober 2009

Kathryn B. McKenzie

Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 2020

Robert J. Shovlin

President, Clinical ServicesSeptember 2016

Douglas M. Brown

Chief Strategy and Corporate Development OfficerFebruary 2020

Dr. Lawrence M. Weiss

Chief Medical OfficerNovember 2019

20202021 Base Salary

 

Named Executive Officer  

 Base Salary   Effective Date

Douglas M. VanOort(1)

  $700,000725,000  March 2, 20201, 2021

Kathryn B. McKenzie Mark W. Mallon

  $375,000725,000  February 5, 2020April 19, 2021

Robert J. Shovlin (2) Kathryn B. McKenzie

  $425,000  March 2, 20201, 2021

Douglas M. Brown George A. Cardoza

  $400,000500,000  February 10, 2020July 5, 2021

Dr. Lawrence M. Weiss Halley E. Gilbert

  $600,000470,000  November 25, 2019August 17, 2021

 Dr. Clive D. Morris (1)

$552,800June 18, 2021

(1) Mr. VanOort voluntarily reduced his annualFor purposes of this table, a blended applicable rate of 1.365 U.S. dollars (“USD”) per Pound Sterling (“GBP”), which was based on a 7-month average rate, has been used to convert Dr. Morris’s salary in April 2020 from $700,000 to $665,000 to align with management’s decision not to implement merit pay increasesUSD for all employees due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Had this voluntary reduction not been made, his salary would have been the base salary stated above as of the related effective date.2021.

(2) Mr. Shovlin voluntarily reduced his annual salary in May 2020 from $425,000 to $400,000 to align with management’s decision not to implement merit pay increases for all employees due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Had this voluntary reduction not been made, his salary would have been the base salary stated above as of the related effective date.

Annual Incentive

The MIP provides for an annual incentive is a performance bonus, paid in cash, that is designed to incentivize and reward Named Executive Officers for operating results, both financial and strategic. The 20202021 performance goals were approved by the Culture and Compensation Committee at the start of the fiscal year and were communicated to each of our Named Executive Officers.Officers at the start of the calendar year or as of the date of hire, as applicable. In 2020,2021, bonus opportunities and outcomes for the Named Executive Officers were as follows:

 

Named Executive Officer

  Target Bonus 
(% of salary)
 Maximum
Bonus

 (% of salary) 
  Actual Bonus 
(% of salary)
  Actual Bonus 
(% of target)

Douglas M. VanOort

 80% 160% 64% 80%

Kathryn B. McKenzie

 50% 100% 47% 93%

Robert J. Shovlin

 50% 100% 33% 66%

Douglas M. Brown

 50% 100% 50% 100%

Dr. Lawrence M. Weiss

 40% 80% 31% 77%
 Named Executive Officer 

 

 

      Target      
Bonus

(% of
salary)

 

 

 

    Maximum    
Bonus

(% of
salary)

 

 

 

      Actual      
Bonus

(% of
salary)

 

 

 

      Actual      
Bonus

(% of
target)

 Douglas M. VanOort (1)

        

 Mark W. Mallon (2)

  100%  200%  80%  80%

 Kathryn B. McKenzie

  50%  100%  39%  78%

 George A. Cardoza

  55%  110%  53%  96%

 Halley E. Gilbert (3)

  50%  100%  48%  96%

 Dr. Clive D. Morris

  50%  100%  54%  107%

The 2020(1) Mr. VanOort resigned as Executive Chairman on October 7, 2021.

(2) Mr. Mallon’s bonus was pro-rated to reflect his start date in April 2021.

(3) Ms. Gilbert’s bonus was pro-rated to reflect her start date in August 2021.

In the first quarter of 2021, the Culture and Compensation Committee approved the performance metrics and associated goals for the 2021 annual incentive is determined based on a combination of NeoGenomics’plan. Consistent with prior years, corporate performance was tied to financial performance as well as individual performance,(revenue and Adjusted EBITDA) and our Strategic Critical Success Factors. All participants, including attainmentthe Named Executive Officers, also had a component of strategic critical success objectives andtheir annual cash bonus contingent on individual performance. The relative weightings of each have been carefully established to reflect the role of each Named Executive Officer and the areas on which they are able to have the most influence and impact. For the year ended December 31, 2020, special considerations related to revenue and adjusted EBITDA were made due to the unique challenges and circumstancesThe inclusion of the COVID-19 pandemic. This resulted in weighting revenue and adjusted EBITDA results with 25% of the weight being placed on the first half of 2020 and 75% on the second half of the year. All Named Executive Officers have a shared corporate financial performance component reflectingreflects the importance of our senior management working collectively as a team to deliver results and their collectiveshared accountability to our stockholders.

The weight of each measure for 20202021 was as follows:

 

 Corporate Performance

 

 Individual
  Performance  

 

  

 

  Corporate Performance  

 

 Individual
Performance

Named Executive Officer

  

    Revenue    

 

  

    Adjusted    

EBITDA

 

  

Strategic Critical

  Success Factors  

 

  

Individual
Goals

 

  

 

    Revenue    

 

 

  Adjusted  

EBITDA

  

 

 

  Strategic  

Critical

Success
Factors

  

 

     Individual    
Goals

Douglas M. VanOort(1)

  40%

 

  40%

 

  10%

 

  10%

 

 

 

 —% 

 

 —% 

 

 —% 

 

 —%

Mark W. Mallon

 

 

 40% 

 

 40% 

 

 10% 

 

 10%

Kathryn B. McKenzie

  30%

 

  30%

 

  10%

 

  30%

 

 

 

 30% 

 

 30% 

 

 10% 

 

 30%

Robert J. Shovlin (1)

  10%

 

  30%

 

  10%

 

  50%

 

George A. Cardoza

 

 

 10% 

 

 10% 

 

 10% 

 

 70%

Douglas M. Brown

  30%

 

  30%

 

  10%

 

  30%

 

Halley E. Gilbert

 

 

 30% 

 

 35% 

 

 10% 

 

 25%

Dr. Lawrence M. Weiss

  35%

 

  35%

 

  10%

 

  20%

 

Dr. Clive D. Morris

 

 

 —% 

 

 —% 

 

 50% 

 

 50%

(1)Mr. VanOort resigned as Executive Chairman on October 7, 2021.

The individual goal for Mr. Shovlin is largely tiedCulture and Compensation Committee took the atypical action of basing the Corporate Performance Score solely on the achievements related to our Strategic Critical Success Factors. This reflected the fact that the revenue and EBITDA goals set in the first quarter of 2021, prior to the financial performance of the Clinical Services division. 15% of Mr. Shovlin’s annual incentive in 2020 is based on achieving the Clinical Services revenue goals set forth.

Corporate Performance

For the year ended December 31, 2020, special considerations related to revenue and adjusted EBITDA were made due to the unique challenges and circumstancesresurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic. This resulted in weighting revenuepandemic and adjusted EBITDAits impact on our business and financial results, with 25%our leadership changes, strategic acquisitions and the approval of the weightre-articulated Company strategy, resulting in these goals not being placed ona meaningful indicator of 2021 performance. This enabled the first half of 2020Culture and 75% onCompensation Committee to ensure that payouts under the second half ofprogram appropriately reflected performance across the year. With this weighting, the corporate performance component of the Annual Bonus Plan resulted in a payout of 141% of targetCompany and did not penalize participants for revenue and no payment for adjusted EBITDA. For the first half of 2020, threshold performance metrics were not achieved. The following chart shows the achievement for the second half of 2020.immediately pursuing actions that aligned with our revised strategic priorities.

Financial Performance Metric (in millions)

    Threshold     Target     Maximum     Achievement 

Revenue

   $233,000    $243,000    $253,000    $251,441 

Adjusted EBITDA

   $35,900    $39,400    $42,900    $34,993 

Strategic Critical success factors paid out at 83% of target, driven by:

Strengthening our world class culture by improving teamwork and emphasizing effective communication;

Providing uncompromising quality through Company-wide leadership, training, and employee engagement; and

Pursuing exceptional service and growth through customer engagement.

Individual Performance

The individual performance componentcomponents of the Annual Bonus Plan includesMIP include specific goals for each Named Executive Officer. Key achievements in the following areas were factored into determining the performance outcomes:

Acquired the Oncology Division assets of HLI - Oncology;

Established strategic collaboration and minority investment in Inivata;

Expanded testing menu to include suite of liquid biopsy tests;

Operationalized high-capacity COVID-19 testing lab resulting in $27 million in revenue and approximately 538,000 tests performed;

Achieved operating segment revenue goals (where indicated in table above); and

Achieved 2020 Company-wide focus initiatives and critical success factors including:

Protecting the well-being of our employees and strengthening our Culture through training, development and inclusive leadership;

Driving profitable growth through strategic marketing and sales initiatives;

Achieving high levels of stockholder satisfaction;

Improving processes through automation and innovation;

Enhancing the customer experience by providing exceptional quality; and

Developing new products and informatics

Our Culture and Compensation Committee approved the CEO’sChief Executive Officer’s recommendations for the individual performance ratings of executives (other than the CEO)Chief Executive Officer). Individual performance ratings of the CEOChief Executive Officer were approved based on an evaluation of performance by the Culture and Compensation Committee. Individual performance ratings were based on individual goals;goals and some of the key achievements of the Named Executive Officers included the following:

 

Named Executive Officer 

 Key Achievements 

 

Individual

Performance

Factor

(% of salary)

Douglas M. VanOort

(1)
 

 

•   Led strategic responseDeveloped and implemented process to COVID-19 pandemic that maintained NeoGenomics’ culture as well as drove COVID-19 PCR testing capabilitiesmanage Chief Executive Officer succession and transition

—%
 Mark W. Mallon

•   Transitioned to Chief Executive Officer role

•   Strengthened executive leadership team through key hires and reorganization of certain responsibilities

• Executed growth strategies, including substantial progress on development of the Informatics Division, expansion into China, and continued growth in NGS and new technologies such as liquid biopsy.

 

 10%

Kathryn B. McKenzie

 

 

•   Transitioned into CFO roleImproved the Company’s liquidity position through developingfinancing events in both January and expanding relationships with key internal and external stakeholders;June

•   Led financingM&A finance diligence efforts resulting in gross proceedsand finance integrations of $322 million. The Company utilized a portion of these proceeds to retire its existing term loan and related interest rate swap agreements;

• Supported acquisition and integration of HLI-Oncology and held key role in completing minority investment in Inivata ;newly acquired businesses

•   Improved financial organization and processes through hiringoperational tools, including implementation of a new, scalable Enterprise Resource Planning system

•   Led team responsible for successful opening of new Fort Myers headquarters

•   Commenced IT transformation and onboardingserved as key partner in integration of Chief AccountingInformation Officer and other Finance roles and making significant progress on cross functional ERP system.

 

 30%

Robert J. Shovlin

 George A. Cardoza
 

 

•   Operationalized COVID-19 PCR testing laboratory, resulting in $27.8 million in revenue;

• Led cross-functional collaboration efforts for commercialization of InVisionFirst®-Lung liquid biopsy assay with Inivata;

• Improved net promoter score to 67;Achieved financial targets including revenue and EBITDA

•   Achieved Clinical revenue growth of approximately 6% in a COVID impacted environment.turnaround time goals

•   Achieved goals specific to Pharma Services division

 

 50%

70%
Named Executive OfficerKey Achievements Halley E. Gilbert 

•   Developed and implemented plans to Individualre-build a sustainable legal team

Performance•   Managed Company self submission to the Office of the Inspector General

Factor•   Enhanced contracts processes

•   Implemented corporate governance best practices

25%

Douglas M. Brown

 Dr. Clive D. Morris
 

 

•   Developed a process to review prioritized deals with management andProgressed the Board and execute on targeted deals;

• Assisted with execution of April 2020 financing transactions, which provided for improved liquidity and strategic flexibility;

• Assumed investor relations responsibilities and developed relationships with key internal and external stakeholders;

• Led efforts related to minority investment and strategic collaboration with Inivata, which included commercialization of the InVisionFirst®-Lung liquid biopsy assay.

•   Drove RaDaR development for U.S. clinical commercialization and biopharma partnering

•   Developed a significant portfolio of biopharma partnerships focused on RaDaR

 30%

Dr. Lawrence M. Weiss

 

• Launched comprehensive suite of solid tumor liquid biopsy tests, including NeoLab Solid Tumor Liquid Biopsy;

• Validated multiple COVID-19 PCR platforms to provide COVID-19 PCR testing capabilities;

• Made significant progress with FDA submission of Next Generation Sequencing panel;

• Improve the professional satisfaction of pathologists; and

• Validate fusion assay submitted for TA

20%50%

(1) Mr. VanOort resigned as Executive Chairman on October 7, 2021.

The combination of corporate and individual performanceperformances resulted in the following awards based on 20202021 performance:

 

Named Executive Officer        Actual Bonus       

    Actual Bonus    

(% of salary)

  

    Actual Bonus    

(% of target)

  

 

  Actual Bonus
($)
   

 

  

Actual Bonus

(% of salary)

  

 

  

Actual Bonus

(% of target)

Douglas M. VanOort(1)

  $             450,000   64%  80% 

 

    

 

  

 

 

Mark W. Mallon (2)

 

 

  407,900  

 

 80% 

 

 80%

Kathryn B. McKenzie

  $175,000  47%  93% 

 

  166,500  

 

 39% 

 

 78%

Robert J. Shovlin

  $140,000   33%  66%

George A. Cardoza

 

 

  242,600  

 

 53% 

 

 96%

Douglas M. Brown (1)

  $200,000  50%  100%

Halley E. Gilbert (3)

 

 

  84,500  

 

 48% 

 

 96%

Dr. Lawrence M. Weiss

  $185,000   31%  77%

Dr. Clive D. Morris (4)

 

 

  296,900  

 

 54% 

 

 107%

(1)Mr. VanOort resigned as Executive Chairman on October 7, 2021.

(2) Mr. Mallon’s bonus was pro-rated to reflect his start date in April 2021.

(3) Mr. Brown’s actualMs. Gilbert’s bonus aswas pro-rated to reflect her start date in August 2021.

(4) For purposes of this table, a percentageblended applicable rate of his target reflects1.365 USD per GBP, which is based on a high level of achievement of individual performance objectives related7-month average rate, has been used to acquisition opportunities.

Although the formulaic outcomeconvert Dr. Morris’s salary to USD for the Chief Executive Officer would have resulted in an actual bonus payout equal to 60% of salary (or 75% of his target bonus), the Culture and Compensation Committee felt it appropriate to apply positive discretion (as permitted by the Annual Incentive Plan) to increase the payout to 64% for special considerations related to the unique challenges and circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic. As outlined above, the actual payout of 64% of salary for the Chief Executive Officer was materially lower than the target bonus opportunity.2021.

20202021 Long-Term Incentive Awards

2020Annual 2021 long-term incentive (“LTI’”LTI”) awards to our named executive officersNamed Executive Officers were primarily made in the form of a combination of stock optionsoption awards and time-based restricted stock. This directly reflects our strategy and, in turn, our compensation philosophy by delivering an appropriate balance of retention and motivation to deliver strong strategic performance, with a view to long-term value creation for our stockholders. The Culture and Compensation Committee views stock optionsoption awards as a performance-based incentive given the inherent requirement for sustained stock price appreciation for awards to yield

value. This is clearly aligned with the interests of our stockholders. The Culture and Compensation Committee also considers it appropriate to grant restricted stock awards to our named executive officersNamed Executive Officers because they provideit provides a degree of retention in our LTI program, alignedprogram. This aligns with one of the goals of our compensation philosophy, which is to retain our highly skilled management team.team, especially those who previously reported to the former Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

The amount of LTI awards granted to each executiveNamed Executive Officer is determined based on his or her individual performance, potential future contributions, market competitiveness, and other factors. Our Culture and Compensation Committee reviews our LTI awards against LTI awards of our peer group and also reviews the overall total compensation of our executive officers against our peer group. On average, annual LTI grant awards for our Named Executive Officers position their overall compensation at or around the median values of our peer group, in cases where there are comparable positions at the peer companies. Stock options and restricted stock awards vest ratably over four years from the date of grant, starting on the first anniversary of the date of grant.

2021 One-Time Incentive Awards

To further enhance the retention impact of our compensation programs, the Culture and Compensation Committee granted one-time incentive awards to certain Named Executive Officers in 2021.

  Named Executive Officer  

Value

Rationale

Target Payment Dates
 Kathryn B. McKenzie

$300,000

•   Closing of strategic Inivata transaction

•   Post-transaction financial integration

•   Successful IT transition and commencement of IT transformation efforts

•   33% June 30, 2021

•   33% December 31, 2021

•   33% December 31, 2022, subject to continued employment

 George A. Cardoza

$200,000

•   Succession support

•   Successful international expansion

•   50% December 31, 2021

•   50% December 31, 2022, subject to continued employment

 Halley E. Gilbert

$100,000

$100,000

•   Sign on bonus

•   Relocation allowance

•   100% August 17, 2021

•   100% August 17, 2021

 Dr. Clive D. Morris

$100,000

•   Completion of Inivata Share Purchase Agreement dated May 4, 2021

•   100% July 19, 2021

£607,500

•   Retention Cash Bonus

•   1st Strategic Objective

•   2nd Strategic Objective

•   50% June 30, 2022

•   25% 30 days after completion

•   25% 30 days after completion

In July 2021, the Culture and Compensation Committee also approved one-time, PSUs for the Named Executive Officers and other select senior leaders for several reasons including alignment with our strategic priorities, retention of executive leaders through a period of Chief Executive Officer, and leadership team and Company transition. These awards were to vest upon the achievement of time-based service conditions and certain performance goals, including financial performance targets and operational milestones.

In the third quarter of 2021, we revised our priorities to focus on needed investments to strengthen our leadership in oncology diagnostics impacting cancer patients worldwide and to bolster the launch of RaDaR. It became apparent that the performance goals for these PSUs did not align with our renewed focus. In addition, the Culture and Compensation Committee agreed there was a need to stabilize our executive team in a time of changing priorities and leadership.

As a result of this misalignment, in December 2021, the Culture and Compensation Committee determined that the PSUs should be forfeited and replaced with time-vested restricted stock awards. The grant of restricted stock serves to retain our executive team, who will now be focused on the successful execution of our strategic priorities. These awards vest ratably over three years with the first tranche vesting on December 31, 2022 and are subject to continued employment with the Company. The target values of the restricted stock awards for each Named Executive Officer was as follows:

 Named Executive Officer

Target Value ($)

 Mark W. Mallon

5,000,000

 Kathryn B. McKenzie

1,000,000

 George A. Cardoza

2,000,000

 Halley E. Gilbert

1,500,000

 Dr. Clive D. Morris

1,000,000

Other Elements of Compensation

Perquisites

We do not provide significant perquisites or personal benefits to Named Executive Officers. We provide competitive relocation benefits to newly hired officers, in keeping with industry practices. We value perquisites at their incremental cost to us in accordance with SEC regulations. These amounts, if applicable, are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table below under the column entitled “All Other Compensation” and the related footnotes.

Benefits

Named Executive Officers based in the United States are provided with health benefits and access toparticipation in our 401(k) Plan. Under the 401(k) Plan NeoGenomics matches contributions at the rate of 100% of every dollar contributed up to 3% of the respective employee’s compensation and an additional 50% of every dollar contributed on the next 2% of compensation (4% maximum Company match). The Named Executive Officers participateDr. Morris, who is based in the same plan as the broader employee population.United Kingdom, is provided health benefits and an employer pension contribution equal to 10% of his annual salary.

Additional Information

Tax and Accounting Considerations

Section 162(m) of the Code generally limits the tax deductibility of compensation in excess of $1 million paid to any employee in any calendar year that is considered to a Covered Employee. A Covered Employee is generally defined as the principal executive officer or principal financial officer at any time during the year, or any individual acting in such a capacity,certain current and the three other most highly compensated executive officers. An employee that was considered a covered employee after 2016 will always be considered a covered employee even if he or she is no longer the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, or one of the three other most highly compensatedformer executive officers during the applicable year. Under the tax rules in effect before 2018, compensation that qualified as “performance-based” under Section 162(m) was deductible without regard to this $1 million limit. However, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law December 22, 2017, repealed the performance-based compensation exception for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, subject toof a transition rule that “grandfathers” certain awards and arrangements that were in effect under a written binding contract on or before November 2, 2017 and were not materially modified after this date. As a result, certain compensation that is paid on or after January 1, 2018 may not be fully deductible, depending on the application of the grandfather rules. Moreover, from and after January 1, 2018, compensation paid in excess of $1 million in any calendar year to a Covered Employee generally will not be deductible.public company.

While the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act limits the deductibility of compensation paid to Covered Employees,Consistent with its past practice, the Culture and Compensation Committee will consistent with its past practice, design compensation programs that are intended to be in the best long-term interests of the Company and our stockholders, with deductibility of compensation being one of a variety of considerations taken into account.even if they are wholly or partially limited as to tax deductibility.

Culture and Compensation Committee Report

The members of the Company’s Culture and Compensation Committee hereby state:

We have reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion & Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement with NeoGenomics’ management and, based on such review and discussions, we have recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion & Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

MEMBERS OF THE CULTURE AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Lynn A. Tetrault,Bruce K. Crowther, Chair

Raymond R. Hipp

Kevin C. Johnson

Stephen M. KanovskyDavid J. Daly

Michael A. Kelly

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLESExecutive Compensation Tables

Summary Compensation Table

The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth all compensation earned and accrued, in all capacities, during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019 and 2018,(or shorter period of employment, as applicable), by the principal executive officer,officers, principal financial officer, and our three other most highly compensated executive officers in 2020,2021, together “Named Executive Officers” (in dollars).:

Name and
Principal Position
 Year  Salary  Bonus
(1)
  Stock
Award
(2)
  Option
Award
(2)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(3)
  Non-
qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
  All Other
Compensation
(4)
  Total 

Douglas M. VanOort (5)

  2020  $  669,039  $  $990,000  $2,010,000  $  450,000  $              —  $          3,000    $4,122,039 

Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer

 

  2019   665,000      742,507   1,338,225   900,000      3,000   3,648,732 
  2018   641,923      650,006   1,278,290   774,000      3,000   3,347,219 

Kathryn B. McKenzie (6)

  2020   359,616     165,000  335,000  175,000        1,034,616

Chief Financial Officer

 

  2019   250,000     44,551  80,293  150,000        524,844
  2018                         

Sharon A. Virag (7)(8)

  2020                         

Chief Financial Officer

  2019   257,723      214,502   386,597   182,823         1,041,645 
  2018   298,462   120,000      485,100   190,000         1,093,562 

Robert J. Shovlin (9)

  2020   404,808     247,500  502,000  140,000     3,000  1,297,308

President of Clinical Services

 

  2019   400,000     214,502  386,597  280,000     3,000  1,284,099
  2018   375,385        737,598  212,756     3,000  1,328,739

Douglas M. Brown (10)

  2020   346,154      198,000   402,000   200,000      100,000   1,246,154 

Chief Strategy and Corporate Development Officer

  2019                         
  2018                         

Dr. Lawrence M. Weiss (11)

  2020   600,000     165,000  335,000  185,000        1,285,000

Chief Medical Officer

  2019   600,000     115,503  208,171  260,000        1,183,674
  2018   571,519  100,000     152,100  32,276        855,895

 

 Name and

 Principal Position

Year

Salary

($)

Bonus (1)
($)

Stock

Award (2)
($)

Option

Award (2)
($)

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation (3)
($)

All Other

Compensation (4)
($)

Total

($)

 Douglas M. VanOort (5)

Former Chair of the

Board and Former Chief

Executive Officer


2021


2020

2019



649,327


669,039

665,000






1,665,204


990,000

742,507



4,912,471


2,010,000

1,338,225




450,000

900,000






7,227,002


4,119,039

3,645,732


 Mark W. Mallon (6)

Director and Chief

Executive Officer


2021


2020

2019



487,981







7,750,000




2,750,000




407,900




83,974




11,479,855



 Kathryn B. McKenzie (7)

Chief Financial Officer


2021


2020

2019



415,384


359,616

250,000



200,000




1,330,000


165,000

44,551



670,000


335,000

80,293



166,500


175,000

150,000



11,600




2,793,484


1,034,616

524,844


 George A. Cardoza (8)

President and Chief

Operating Officer,

Laboratory Operations,

Clinical Services


2021


2020

2019



447,500


384,630

380,000



100,000




2,660,000


214,500

164,993



1,340,000


435,500

297,381



242,600


155,000

265,000



10,400




4,800,500


1,189,630

1,107,374


 Halley E. Gilbert (9)

Chief Legal Officer and

Corporate Secretary


2021


2020

2019



160,885




100,000




4,000,000




1,000,000




84,500




100,000




5,445,385



 Dr. Clive D. Morris (10)

President, Inivata


2021


2020

2019



299,433





100,000






1,466,667





933,333




296,900




30,185




3,126,518



(1)

Amounts shown for Ms. McKenzie and Mr. Cardoza consist of bonuses earned upon completion of certain strategic goals from a one-time incentive program. Amount shown for Ms. Gilbert consists of a one-time signing bonus. Amount shown for Dr. Weiss in 2018Morris consists of a discretionary bonus as well as a bonus paid in accordance with his medical services agreement.one-time incentive cash payment upon closing of the Inivata acquisition.

(2) 

Amounts shown represent grant date fair value computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, with respect to restricted stock awards (based on the closing price of our common stock on the day prior to the grant date) and stock optionsoption awards granted to the Named Executive Officers. The amounts shown disregard the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. Each stock option was granted with an exercise price equal to the closing value of our common stock on the day prior to the grant date.

For 2021 certain of our Named Executive Officers were also granted PSUs. Under SEC rules, these PSUs are valued based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions associated with these awards, which was determined to be not probable at grant. As a result, no amount in respect of the PSUs granted in 2021 has been included in the table above. The grant date fair value of the PSUs, assuming that the performance conditions associated with these awards were achieved in full, was: Mr. Mallon, $5.0 million; Ms. McKenzie, $1.0 million; Mr. Cardoza, $2.0 million; Ms. Gilbert, $1.5 million; and Dr. Morris, $1.0 million. The PSUs were cancelled on December 30, 2021.

See Item 8, Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to our Consolidated Financial Statements of our Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on February 25, 20212022, for a description of the valuation methodology of stock and option awards. For Mr. VanOort, the amounts included for 2021 in the “Stock Award”

and “Option Award” columns also include the incremental fair value computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718 of restricted stock and option awards ($1.6 million and $4.9 million, respectively) associated with the accelerated vesting of his awards in connection with his termination of employment.

(3) 

AmountAmounts shown consist of awards based on performance under our management incentive bonus plansMIP for each respective year.

(4) 

AmountPerquisites and other personal benefits for a Named Executive Officer are excluded if the total value of all of such perquisites and personal benefits is less than $10,000. The table below shows the components of the All Other Compensation column shown above for Mr. Brown2021:

   
 Named Executive Officer 

Retirement Plan Company
Contribution
(a)

$

  

Relocation
Allowance
(b)

$

  

Total All Other
Compensation

$

 

 Douglas M. VanOort

         

 Mark W. Mallon

  11,600   72,374   83,974 

 Kathryn B. McKenzie

  11,600      11,600 

 George A. Cardoza

  10,400      10,400 

 Halley E. Gilbert

     100,000   100,000 

 Dr. Clive D. Morris

  30,185      30,185 

(a)

The amounts in 2020 consiststhis column, except the amount for Dr. Morris, represent our matching contributions allocated to each of the named executive officers who participated in our 401(k) retirement savings plan in 2021. All such matching contributions were fully vested upon contribution. The amount for Dr. Morris represents our employer contributions to his account under a relocation allowance asgroup personal pension scheme maintained for the Company’s U.K. employees. This amount was converted from GBP using a blended applicable rate of 1.365 USD per the terms of his employment agreement.GBP, which is based on a seven-month average rate for 2021.

(b)

The amounts in this column represent payments to Mr. Mallon and Ms. Gilbert for relocation allowances pursuant to each of their employment agreements.

(5) 

Mr. VanOort resigned as Chief Executive Officer effective April 19, 2021, resigned as Executive Chair of the Board effective October 7, 2021, and resigned from the Board effective November 10, 2021. Mr. VanOort voluntarily reduced his annual salary in April 2020 from $700,000 to $665,000 to align with management’s decision not to implement merit pay increases for all employees due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

(6)

Mr. Mallon joined the Company as Chief Executive Officer and Director in April 2021. On an annualized basis his salary would have been $725,000 in 2021. Mr. Mallon stepped down as Chief Executive Officer and resigned as a member of the Board, effective March 28, 2022.

(7) 

Ms. McKenzie was appointed to Chief Financial Officer in February 2020. Prior to that date Ms. McKenzie served as the Company’s Vice President of Finance and Chief Accounting Officer since 2017 and Principal Financial Officer since 2019.

(7)(8)

Mr. Cardoza was appointed to President and Chief Operating Officer, Laboratory Operations, Clinical Services in July 2021. Prior to that date Mr. Cardoza served as the Company’s President of Pharma Services since 2017.

(9) 

Ms. Virag resigned effectiveGilbert joined the Company as Chief Legal Officer in August 2019.2021. On an annualized basis her annual salary for 2019 would have been $416,000.$470,000 in 2021. Ms. Gilbert is expected to depart the Company effective April 22, 2022.

(10)

Dr. Morris joined the Company as President, Inivata in June, 2021. On an annualized basis his salary (as converted to USD) would have been $552,800 using a blended applicable rate of 1.365 USD per GBP, which is based on a seven-month average rate for 2021.

(8)

Ms. Virag joined the Company as Chief Financial Officer in March 2018. On an annualized basis, her annual salary would have been $400,000.

(9)

Mr. Shovlin voluntarily reduced his annual salary in May 2020 from $425,000 to $400,000 to align with management’s decision not to implement merit pay increases for all employees due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

(10)

Mr. Brown joined the Company as Chief Strategy and Corporate Development Officer in February 2020. On an annualized basis, his annual salary would have been $400,000.

(11)

Dr. Weiss was appointed Chief Medical Officer in November 2019. Prior to this appointment, Dr. Weiss served as the Company’s Chief Scientific Officer since December 2018.

Narrative to the Summary Compensation Table

Grants of Plan BasedPlan-Based Awards

The following table shows information regarding grants of non-equity and equity awards that we made during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20202021, to each of our Named Executive Officers.Officers:

 

Name

 Grant Date    Estimated Future Payouts Under  
Non-Equity Incentive Plan (1)
  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
  Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
  Exercise
or

Base
Price

of  Option
Awards
($/Share)
  Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
(2)
 
 

 

Threshold

  Target  Maximum 

Douglas M. VanOort

  3/2/2020          80        160       225,084  $  28.33  $  2,010,000 

Chief Executive Officer and

Chairman of the Board

  3/2/2020                34,945     $  $990,000 
        

Kathryn B. McKenzie (3)

  3/2/2020      50  100     37,514 $28.33 $335,000

Chief Financial Officer

  3/2/2020            5,824    $ $165,000

Robert J. Shovlin

  3/2/2020      50  100     56,271  $28.33  $502,500 

President, Clinical Services

  3/2/2020            8,736     $  $247,500 

Douglas M. Brown (4)

  3/2/2020      50  100     45,017 $28.33 $402,000

Chief Strategy and Corporate

Development Officer

  3/2/2020            6,989    $ $198,000

Dr. Lawrence M. Weiss (5)

  3/2/2020      40  80     37,514  $28.33  $335,000 

Chief Medical Officer

  3/2/2020            5,824     $  $165,000 
       

Named Executive

Officer

 Grant
Date
  

Estimated Future Payouts Under

Non-Equity Incentive Plan (1) ($)

  

Estimated Future Payouts Under

Equity Incentive Plan (2) (#)

  

All Other

Stock

Awards:

Number of

Shares of

Stock or

Units (#)

  

Other

Option

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Options (#)

  

Exercise or

Base Price
per Share

of Option

Awards ($)

  

Grant

Date Fair

Value of

Stock and

Option

Awards (3)

($)

 
 Threshold  Target  Maximum  Threshold  Target  Maximum 

Douglas M. VanOort (4)

Former Chair of the Board and Former Chief Executive Officer

  3/02/21                     56,423         3,000,000 
  11/10/21                     101,574  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1,665,204 
  11/10/21                    

 

 

 

  284,597   (3)   4,912,471 

Mark W. Mallon (5)

Director and Chief Executive Officer

  4/19/21      509,893   1,019,785  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  55,736         2,750,000 
  4/19/21                        151,016   49.34   2,750,000 
  7/01/21               110,693                
  12/30/21                     152,858         5,000,000 

Kathryn B. McKenzie

Chief Financial Officer

  3/02/21      212,500   425,000            6,207         330,000 
  3/02/21                        35,171   53.17   670,000 
  7/01/21               22,139                
  12/30/21                     30,572         1,000,000 

George A. Cardoza (6)

President and Chief Operating Officer, Laboratory Operations, Clinical Services

  3/02/21      253,242   506,484            6,207         330,000 
  3/02/21                        35,171   53.17   670,000 
  7/01/21               44,277                
  7/05/21                     7,584         330,000 
  7/05/21                        40,502   43.95   670,000 
  12/30/21                     61,143         2,000,000 

Halley E. Gilbert (7)

Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary

  8/17/21      87,802   175,604            59,228         2,500,000 
  8/17/21                        63,331   42.21   1,000,000 
  8/17/21               35,537                
  12/30/21                     45,858         1,500,000 

Dr. Clive D. Morris (8)

President, Inivata

  6/18/21      276,413   552,825            10,708         466,667 
  6/18/21                        53,857   43.58   933,333 
  7/01/21               22,139                
  12/30/21                     30,572         1,000,000 

 

(1) 

The Fiscal Year 2020 Annual Bonus2021 annual bonus of non-equity incentive plan awards sets forth the target and maximum of the amounts awarded as an annual bonus in fiscal year 20202021 under the management incentive plan.MIP. The actual amount earned is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table above in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column. All awards vest ratably over four years commencing one year after the date of grant except for stock awards granted December 30, 2021, which vest ratably over three years commencing one year after the date of grant.

(2)

For 2021, our Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. VanOort) were granted PSUs. Under SEC rules, these PSUs are valued based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions associated with these awards, which was determined to be not probable at grant. As a result, no amount in respect of the PSUs granted in 2021 has been included in the table above under “Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards.” The grant date fair value of the

PSUs, assuming that the performance conditions associated with these awards were achieved in full, was: Mr. Mallon, $5.0 million; Ms. McKenzie, $1.0 million; Mr. Cardoza, $2.0 million; Ms. Gilbert, $1.5 million; and Dr. Morris, $1.0 million. The PSUs were cancelled on December 30, 2021. In December 2021 the Named Executive Officers forfeited the PSUs and received a grant of time-vested restricted stock awards included elsewhere in this table and described under 2021 One-Time Incentive Awards on page 40.

(3) 

Represents the grant date fair value calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Information regarding the assumptions used in the valuation of option awards can be found in Item 8, Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to our Consolidated Financial Statements of our Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on February 25, 20212022, for a description of the valuation methodology of stock and option awards. Our executive officers will not realize the value of these awards in cash unless these awards are exercised and the underlying shares are subsequently sold. See also our discussion of stock based compensation under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(3) (4)

Ms. McKenzie was appointed to Chief Financial Officer in February 2020. Prior to that date, Ms. McKenzie servedMr. VanOort resigned as Executive Chairman on October 7, 2021. On November 10, 2021, the Company’s Vice PresidentCulture and Compensation Committee authorized the accelerated vesting of Finance115,784 and Chief Accounting Officer since 2017168,813 shares at exercise prices of $19.60 and Principal Financial Officer since 2019.$28.33, respectively.

(4)(5)

Mr. BrownMallon joined the Company as Chief StrategyExecutive Officer and Corporate Development OfficerDirector in February 2020.April 2021.

(5) (6)

Dr. WeissMr. Cardoza was appointed to President and Chief MedicalOperating Officer, Laboratory Operations, Clinical Services in November 2019.July 2021. Prior to this appointment, Dr. Weissthat date Mr. Cardoza served as the Company’s President of Pharma Services since 2017.

(7)

Ms. Gilbert joined the Company as Chief ScientificLegal Officer since December 2018.in August 2021.

(8)

Dr. Morris joined the Company as President, Inivata in June, 2021. Dr. Morris’s estimated future payouts under non-equity incentive plan were converted from GBP using a blended applicable rate of 1.365 USD per GBP, which is based on a seven-month average rate for 2021.

Narrative Disclosure to the Summary Compensation Table and the

Grants of Plan Awards Table

In 2021, each of our Named Executive Officers, other than Dr. Morris whose service agreement is described below, were parties to employment agreements (the “Pre-2022 Employment Agreements”). On or around December 31, 2021, each of the Named Executive Officers employed as of December 31, 2021 entered into new employment agreements, effective as of January 1, 2022, in substantially the form attached as Exhibit 10.11 of the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. For purposes of this narrative disclosure, a summary of the Pre-2022 Employment Agreements is set forth below. The severance payments and benefits to which each of our currently employed Named Executive Officers are entitled under the agreements currently in effect are described under the “Employment Agreements and Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” section of this Proxy Statement.

Mr. VanOort entered into an employment agreement with us on October 28, 2009, pursuant to which he was entitled to an initial base salary of $325,000 and a target annual incentive bonus equal to 60% of his base salary.

Mr. Mallon’s Pre-2022 Employment Agreement was entered into in connection with his employment on February 23, 2021 and, pursuant to such agreement, Mr. Mallon was entitled to an initial base salary of $725,000 and a target annual incentive bonus equal to 100% of his base salary. Mr. Mallon was also entitled to relocation benefits up to $600,000 and eligible to participate in our employee benefit plans. Further, Mr. Mallon’s employment agreement provided that he receive an equity grant in the amount of $5.5 million, to be split equally between restricted shares and stock options, each vesting ratably over a period of four years from the date of grant, subject to continued employment. The employment agreement also provided that: (a) within six months of his start date, Mr. Mallon be granted a one-time performance-based award equal to a minimum of $5.0 million in the form of equity and/or cash with a vesting schedule as determined by the Culture and Compensation Committee; and (b) in 2022, Mr. Mallon receive an annual equity grant of restricted shares and options with an aggregate target value equal to a minimum of $5.0 million, each vesting ratably over a period of four years from the date of grant.

Ms. McKenzie’s Pre-2022 Employment Agreement was entered into on February 5, 2020 and, pursuant to such agreement, Ms. McKenzie was entitled to an initial base salary of $375,000 and a target annual incentive bonus equal to 50% of her base salary. The employment agreement also provided that Ms. McKenzie receive a grant of stock options and restricted shares in amounts approved by the Culture and Compensation Committee and Ms. McKenzie be eligible to participate in our employee benefit plans.

Mr. Cardoza’s Pre-2022 Employment Agreement was entered into on July 5, 2021 and, pursuant to such agreement, he was entitled to an initial base salary of $500,000 and a target annual incentive bonus equal to 60% of his base salary. The employment agreement also provided that he receive an equity grant in the amount of $1.0 million and in the form restricted shares and stock options, each vesting ratably over a period of four years from the date of grant, subject to continued employment and beginning in 2022, receive annual incentive grants of restricted shares and stock options which vest ratably over a period of four years from the date of grant, subject to continued employment.

Ms. Gilbert’s Pre-2022 Employment Agreement was entered into in connection with her employment on August 23, 2021 and, pursuant to such agreement, Ms. Gilbert was entitled to an initial base salary of $470,000 and a target annual incentive bonus equal to 50% of her base salary. Ms. Gilbert was also entitled to relocation benefits up to $100,000 and eligible to participate in our employee benefit plans. Further, Ms. Gilbert’s employment agreement provided that she receive an equity grant in the amount of $2.0 million, in the form of restricted shares, each vesting ratably over a period of four years from the date of grant, subject to continued employment. The employment agreement also provided that: (a) Ms. Gilbert receive restricted share and option grants equal to $1.5 million in the aggregate, each vesting ratably over a period of four years from the date of grant, subject to continued employment; (b) within three months of her start date, Ms. Gilbert be granted a one-time performance-based award equal to a minimum of $1.5 million in the form of equity and/or cash with a vesting schedule as determined by the Culture and Compensation Committee; and (c) in 2022, Ms. Gilbert receive an annual equity grant of restricted shares and options with an aggregate target value equal to a minimum of $1.5 million, each vesting ratably over a period of four years from the date of grant.

Dr. Morris entered into a service agreement with a subsidiary of the Company, Inivata Limited in June 2021. Pursuant to such agreement, Dr. Morris is entitled to an annual salary of £405,000 and eligible to receive a performance base bonus in the management incentive plan with a target bonus of 50% of his salary for 2021 and, in future years, not less than 50% of his salary. Further, Dr. Morris is entitled to a retention cash bonus in an amount equal to £607,500, of which 50% of the bonus vests on June 30, 2022 and the remaining 50% of the bonus subject to our achievement of certain performance milestones. Dr. Morris is also eligible to participate in private medical insurance for him and his family and life insurance.

Options Exercised and Stock Vested

The options exercised by and stock vested for our Named Executive Officers during the year ended December 31, 2021, were as follows:

  
 

 

 Stock Option Awards  Restricted Stock Awards 
     
 Name Executive Officer 

Number of

Shares

Acquired

on Exercise

(#)

  

Value

Realized on

Exercise

($)

  

Number of
Shares

Acquired on

Vesting

(#)

    

 

 

Value
Realized on

Vesting

($)

 

 Douglas M. VanOort

  345,508   10,906,521   135,258  (1)   6,068,016 

 Mark W. Mallon

          

 

   

 Kathryn B. McKenzie

  5,000   128,700   2,024  (1)   106,366 

 George A. Cardoza

        3,996  

 

  207,839 

 Halley E. Gilbert

          

 

   

 Dr. Clive D. Morris

          

 

   

(1)

Shares were withheld to cover tax withholding obligations in connection with these exercises. The number of shares reported represents the gross number before the withholding of such shares.

Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 20202021

The Culture and Compensation Committee has been given the authority to set all performance metrics for the vesting of performance-based equity awards and has the authority to adjust any target financial metrics used for such vesting if it deems it appropriate to do so. The following table sets forth information with respect to outstanding equity awards held by our Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2020:2021:

 

Option Awards

  Stock Awards 

Name and

Principal Position

 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
    Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
  Option
Exercise
Price
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
that
have not
Vested
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
have not
Vested
     Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
that have
not
Vested
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
that have
not
Vested
 

Douglas M. VanOort

  333,333   166,667  (1)     $8.03   2/26/2023   15,477  $833,282   

(2

(3

 
) 

) 

      

Chief Executive
Officer & Chairman of the Board

  57,891   173,676  (4)     $19.60   3/1/2024   28,413  $1,529,756   

(3

(5

 
) 

) 

      
     225,084  (6)     $28.33   3/2/2027   34,945  $1,881,439   

(3

(7

 
) 

) 

      

Kathryn B. McKenzie

  25,000    (8)     $9.07  10/18/2022   1,705 $91,797  

(3

(5

 
) 

) 

      

Chief Financial Officer

  24,000  16,000 (1)     $8.03  2/26/2023   5,824 $313,564  

(3

(7

 
) 

) 

      
  3,473  10,421 (4)     $19.60  3/1/2024              
     37,514 (6)     $28.33  3/2/2027              

Robert J. Shovlin

     96,167  (1)     $8.03   2/26/2023   8,208  $441,919   

(3

(5

 
) 

) 

      

President of Clinical Services

     50,173  (4)     $19.60   3/1/2024   8,736  $470,346   

(3

(7

 
) 

) 

      
     56,271  (6)     $28.33   3/2/2027              

Douglas M. Brown

     45,017 (6)     $28.33  3/2/2027   6,989 $376,288  

(3

(7

 
) 

) 

      

Chief Strategy and Corporate Development Officer

                             

Dr. Lawrence M. Weiss

     6,667  (9)     $9.22   4/19/2023   4,420  $237,973   

(3

(5

 
) 

) 

      

Chief Medical Officer

     8,334  (10)     $13.87   12/12/2023   5,824  $313,564   

(3

(7

 
) 

) 

      
     27,017  (4)     $19.60   3/1/2024              
     37,514  (6)     $28.33   3/2/2027              
Stock Option Awards     Restricted Stock
Awards
 
           

 Name and

 Principal Position

 Grant Date  

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable

(#)

  

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable

(#)

      

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options

(#)

  

Option
Exercise
Price

($)

  Option
Expiration
Date
     

Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
that
have not
Vested

(#)

  

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
have not
Vested (1)

($)

     

 Douglas M. VanOort

Former Chair of the

Board and Former

Chief Executive Officer

 

  2/26/18   154,492          8.03   2/08/22         
  3/01/19   231,567      (2 )      19.60   2/08/22         
  3/02/20   225,084      (2 )      28.33   2/08/22         
           

 Mark W. Mallon

Director and Chief

Executive Officer

 

  4/19/21   151,016      (3 )      49.34   4/19/28    55,736   1,901,712   (4 ) 
  12/30/21                152,858   5,215,515   (5 ) 
           

 Kathryn B. McKenzie

Chief Financial Officer

  10/18/17   20,000          9.07   10/18/22         
  2/26/18   40,000          8.03   2/26/23         
  3/01/19   6,946   6,948   (3 )      19.60   3/01/24    1,137   38,794   (4 ) 
  3/02/20   9,378   28,136   (3 )      28.33   3/02/27    4,368   149,036   (4 ) 
  3/02/21      35,171   (3 )      53.17   3/02/28    6,207   211,783   (4 ) 
  

 

12/30/21

 

 

 

               30,572   1,043,117   (5 ) 

 George A. Cardoza

President and Chief

Operating Officer,

Laboratory Operations

  4/28/17   50,000          7.52   4/28/22         
  2/26/18   192,500          8.03   2/26/23         
  3/1/19   25,729   25,730   (3 )      19.60   3/01/24    4,210   143,645   (4 ) 
  3/02/20   12,192   36,576   (3 )      28.33   3/02/27    5,679   193,767   (4 ) 
  3/02/21      35,171   (3 )      53.17   3/02/28    6,207   211,783   (4 ) 
  7/05/21      40,502   (3 )      43.95   7/05/28    7,584   258,766   (4 ) 
  

 

12/30/21

 

 

 

               61,143   2,086,199   (5 ) 

 Halley E. Gilbert

Chief Legal Officer and

Corporate Secretary

 

  8/17/21      63,331   (3 )      42.21   8/17/28    59,228   2,020,859   (4 ) (5) 
  12/30/21                45,858   1,564,675   (5 ) 
           

 Dr. Clive D. Morris

President, Inivata

  6/18/21      53,857   (3 )      43.58   6/18/28    10,708   365,357   (4 ) 
  12/30/21                30,572   1,043,117   (5 ) 

 

(1)

Option awards vested ratably on February 26, 2019, February 26, 2020 and February 26, 2021.

(2)

Stock awards vest ratably on August 1, 2019, August 1, 2020 and August 1, 2021.

(3)

Market value based on the closing stock price of $34.12 at December 31, 2020.2021.

(4) (2)

OptionUpon retirement from the Board on November 10, 2021, Mr. VanOort’s unvested awards vest ratably on March 1, 2020, March 1, 2021, March 1, 2022 and March 1, 2023.were accelerated.

(5) 

Stock awards vest ratably on March 1, 2020, March 1, 2021, March 1, 2022 and March 1, 2023.

(6)

Option awards vest ratably on March 2, 2021, March 2, 2022, March 2, 2023 and March 2, 2024.

(7)

Stock awards vest ratably on March 2, 2021, March 2, 2022, March 2, 2023 and March 2, 2024.

(8)

Option awards vested ratably on October 18, 2018, October 18, 2019 and October 18, 2020.

(9)(3)

Option awards vest ratably on April 19, 2019, April 19, 2020 and April 19, 2021.over four years commencing one year after date of grant.

(10)(4)

OptionRestricted stock awards vest ratably on December 12, 2019, December 12, 2020 and December 12, 2021.over four years commencing one year after date of grant.

Options Exercised and Stock Vested

The options exercised by and stock vested for our Named Executive Officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 were as follows:

   Option Awards

 

   Stock Awards

 

 

Name

  Number  of

Shares

Acquired

on Exercise
   Value

Realized on

Exercise
   Number of
Shares

Acquired  on
Vesting
     Value
Realized on

Vesting
 

Douglas M. VanOort

   500,000   $17,365,834    65,681  (1)   $1,850,891 

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

      $    15,476  (1)   $591,647 
      $    9,470  (1)   $268,285 

Kathryn B. McKenzie

      $    568  (1)   $16,091

Chief Financial Officer

      $        $

Robert J. Shovlin

   66,667   $2,034,700    16,667  (1)   $469,676 

President of Clinical Services

   96,167   $2,195,646    2,736  (1)   $77,511 
   16,724   $310,523        $ 

Douglas M. Brown

      $       $

Chief Strategy and Corporate Development Officer

      $       $

Dr. Lawrence M. Weiss

   50,000   $2,194,738    1,473    $41,730 

Chief Medical Officer

   20,000   $869,600        $ 
   13,333   $553,719        $ 
   16,666   $614,642        $ 
   9,005   $280,506        $ 

 (1)(5)

Shares were withheld to cover tax withholding obligations in connection with this exercise. The numberRestricted stock awards vest ratably over three years commencing one year after date of shares and value reported represents the gross number prior to withholding of such shares.grant.

Employment Agreements and Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The Company is a party to employment contracts that contain provisions for payment of severance upon termination by either the Company without cause or the executive for good reason, or terminations occurring during a change of control period. General terms of these arrangements are described below.

Resignation of Former Chief Executive Officer

Mr. VanOort’s voluntary resignation on November 10, 2021, did not provide for payment of severance or other termination benefits. However, in recognition of Mr. VanOort’s significant contributions as both the Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, the Culture and Compensation Committee approved the accelerated vesting of all of his outstanding and unvested stock and option awards (101,574 shares of restricted stock and 284,597 options).

Potential Payments Upon Termination

In the event of termination of an executive’s employment by either the Company without cause or the executive for good reason, under the employment and service agreements as currently in effect, the Company will provide the following in addition to final compensation:

an amount equal to one times the executive’s annual base salary,

an amount equal to the executive’s target bonus,

reimbursement of COBRA premiums for up to 12 months following the executive’s termination, and

accelerated vesting of time-based equity awards outstanding at the time of the executive’s termination that would have continued to vest for the following 12 months.

Under Dr. Morris’ service agreement with a subsidiary of the Company, Inivata Limited, Inivata Limited is required to provide him with six months’ notice of certain terminations of employment, but does not otherwise provide benefits and payments upon a termination. However, at our election, the notice period may be converted to a garden leave period in which Dr. Morris will still remain an employee. During the garden leave period, which may be up to six months, the Company will provide the following:

an amount equal to Dr. Morris’ base salary during the garden leave period,

continuation of health care coverage during the garden leave period,

an amount equal to Dr. Morris’ pro-rata bonus calculated through the expiration of the garden leave period,

continued eligibility to earn any unpaid portion of the performance component of the retention cash bonus to the extent earned in accordance with its terms

In addition, under the terms of Dr. Morris’ retention cash bonus, if his employment is terminated without cause prior to June 30, 2022 he will receive the unpaid portion of the time component of this bonus (£303,750) and will remain eligible to earn the unpaid performance component (£303,750) in accordance with its terms.

The following table shows the Named Executive Officers with such provisions and thepresents estimated financial impact assumingamounts that would be payable or provided to these Named Executive Officers if employment were terminated by either the Company without cause or the executive for good reason at December 31, 2020:2021:

 

   Benefits and Payments

 

 
Named Executive Officer  Base Salary(1)   Benefits(2) 

Douglas M. VanOort

  $700,000   $14,484 

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

    

Kathryn B. McKenzie

  $375,000  $13,573

Chief Financial Officer

    

Robert J. Shovlin

  $425,000   $20,557 

President of Clinical Services

    

Douglas M. Brown

  $400,000  $15,757

Chief Strategy and Corporate Development Officer

    

Dr. Lawrence M. Weiss

  $600,000   $27,048 

Chief Medical Officer

    
 

 

 Benefits and Payments Upon Termination 
   
 Named Executive Officer 

Base Salary (1)

($)

  

Target Bonus (2)

($)

  

Benefits (3)

($)

 

 Mark W. Mallon

  725,000   725,000   34,000 

 Kathryn B. McKenzie

  425,000   212,500   19,000 

 George C. Cardoza

  500,000   300,000   34,000 

 Halley E. Gilbert

  470,000   235,000   34,000 

 Dr. Clive D. Morris (4)

         

(1) Represents 12 months continuation of base salary.

(2) Represents the estimated incremental cost to the Company for continuation of health care benefits for 12 months.

The following Named Executive Officers have stock options and/or restricted stock agreements that contain provisions providing for accelerated vesting upon change in control.
(1)

Represents an amount equal to the executive’s annual base salary at December 31, 2021.

(2)

Represents the target bonus.

(3)

Represents the estimated incremental cost to the Company for continuation of health care benefits for 12 months.

(4)

Dr. Morris is a party to a service agreement with a subsidiary of the Company, Inivata Limited, that requires Inivata Limited to provide him with six months’ notice of certain terminations of employment, but that does not otherwise provide benefits and payments upon a termination.

The following table showspresents accelerated vesting for certain equity awards outstanding at the estimated benefit totime of the executive’s termination for each Named Executive Officer, assumingif employment were terminated by either the Company without cause or the executive for good reason at December 31, 2021:

 

 

 Vesting Upon Termination 
    
 Named Executive Officer 

Unvested
Stock
Option

(#)

  

Stock
Option
Awards

Estimated
Benefit (1)

($)

  

Unvested
Restricted
Stock

(#)

  

Restricted
Stock

Estimated
Benefit (1)

($)

 

 Mark W. Mallon

  37,754      64,886   2,213,910 

 Kathryn B. McKenzie

  21,644   104,741   13,765   469,662 

 George C. Cardoza

  43,974   257,392   27,826   949,423 

 Halley E. Gilbert

  15,832      34,041   1,161,479 

 Dr. Clive D. Morris

            

(1) Estimated benefit based on the closing stock price of $34.12 at December 31, 2021.

Potential Payments Upon Change in Control

In the event of termination during the three month period prior to or the twenty-four month period following a change in control (“Change in Control Period”), the general terms of these arrangements (other than the service agreement with Dr. Morris) are as follows:

In the event of termination of an executive’s employment by either the Company without cause or the executive for good reason during a Change in Control Period, the Company will provide the following in addition to final compensation:

in the case of an executive other than the Chief Executive Officer, an amount equal to the executive’s base salary times two and qualifying termination based on “double trigger” provisionsin the case of the Chief Executive Officer, an amount equal to the Chief Executive’s base salary times three;

an amount equal to the executive’s target bonus;

reimbursement of COBRA premiums for up to 12 months following the executive’s termination;

accelerated vesting of all unvested equity awards outstanding at the time of the executive’s termination;

The following table presents estimated amounts that would be payable or provided to these Named Executive Officers if employment were terminated due to a change in control at December 31, 2020:2021:

 

  

 

 

Vesting Upon Change in Control

 

 

 

 

 

Named Executive Officer

  


Unvested
Stock
Options

#

 
 
 

 

  


Stock
Options

Estimated
Benefit (1)

 
 

 
 

  


Unvested
Restricted
Stock

#

 
 
 

 

  


Restricted
Stock

Estimated
Benefit (1)

 
 

 
 

Douglas M. VanOort, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

  565,427  $  19,323,574   78,835  $  4,244,476 

Kathryn B. McKenzie, Chief Financial Officer

  63,935  $2,046,757   7,529  $405,361 

Robert J. Shovlin, President of Clinical Services

  202,611  $7,558,807   16,944  $912,265 

Douglas M. Brown, Chief Strategy and Corporate Development Officer

  45,017  $1,148,384   6,989  $376,288 

Dr. Lawrence M. Weiss, Chief Medical Officer

  79,532  $2,512,636   10,244  $551,537 
 

 

   Benefits and Payments Due to Change in Control    
    
 Named Executive Officer 

Base Salary (1)

($)

  

Target
Bonus (2)

($)

  

Benefits (3)

($)

 

 Mark W. Mallon

  2,175,000   725,000   34,000 

 Kathryn B. McKenzie

  850,000   425,000   19,000 

 George C. Cardoza

  1,000,000   600,000   34,000 

 Halley E. Gilbert

  940,000   470,000   34,000 

 Dr. Clive D. Morris

         

(1) 

Represents an amount equal to the Named Executive Officer’s base salary times two at December 31, 2021 except for Mr. Mallon who would receive three times his base salary.

(2)

Represents the Named Executive Officer’s target bonus.

(3)

Represents the estimated incremental cost to the Company for continuation of health care benefits for 12 months.

The following table presents accelerated vesting for certain equity awards outstanding to these Named Executive Officers if employment were terminated due to a change in control at December 31, 2021:

 

 

 Vesting Due to Change in Control 
     
 Named Executive Officer 

Unvested
Stock
Option

(#)

  

Stock
Option
Awards

Estimated
Benefit (1)

($)

  

Unvested
Restricted
Stock

(#)

  

Restricted
Stock

Estimated
Benefit (1)

($)

 

 Mark W. Mallon

  151,016      208,594   7,117,227 

 Kathryn B. McKenzie

  70,255   263,792   42,284   1,442,730 

 George C. Cardoza

  137,979   585,375   84,823   2,894,161 

 Halley E. Gilbert

  63,331      105,086   3,585,534 

 Dr. Clive D. Morris

  53,857      41,280   1,408,474 

(1) Estimated benefit based on the closing stock price of $34.12 at December 31, 2020.2021.

Timing of Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The timing of severance payments is subject to certain terms and conditions contained within each Named Executive Officer’s agreement. For a complete description of these terms and conditions please refer to Exhibit 10.11, Form of Executive Employment Agreement between NeoGenomics, Inc. and each of its executive officers, as filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Mr. Mallon’s Separation Payments

In connection with Mr. Mallon stepping down as Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Mallon and the Company entered into a Separation Agreement dated as of March 28, 2022 (the “Separation Agreement”). Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, subject to Mr. Mallon’s execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims in favor of the Company, and Mr. Mallon’s compliance with his existing restrictive covenants, and in full consideration of any rights due under Mr. Mallon’s employment agreement with the Company, the Company will pay Mr. Mallon (i) 12 months of base salary; (ii) his target annual bonus; (iii) payment of premiums for healthcare coverage through the federal law commonly known as “COBRA” until the earliest of (a) 12 months post-termination, (b) the date Mr. Mallon and his eligible dependents cease to be eligible for such coverage under applicable law or plan terms or (c) the date at which Mr. Mallon obtains health coverage from another employer; and (iv) reimbursement for certain relocation and housing costs.

In addition, pursuant to the Separation Agreement, (i) the unvested portion of the buyout equity awards described above will become fully vested as of the separation date, and (ii) the portion of any other outstanding time-based equity awards held by Mr. Mallon that would have vested by their terms in the 12-month period following the separation date had Mr. Mallon remained continuously employed will become vested as of the separation date, with the remaining portion of each such award terminating on the separation date. Mr. Mallon will have a period of 36 months following the separation date to exercise the vested options he held as of the separation date.

Ms. Gilbert’s Separation Payments

In connection with Ms. Gilbert’s departure, Ms. Gilbert is expected to receive payments and other benefits substantially consistent with those described above under “Potential Payments Upon Termination.”

CEOChief Executive Officer Pay Ratio and Median Annual Total Compensation

The Culture and Compensation Committee reviewed a comparison of our CEO’s total annual compensation toChief Executive Officer Pay Ratio

For 2021 the total annualannualized compensation of Mr. Mallon, our median employee forChief Executive Officer, was approximately $11.8 million (determined based on his annual salary of $725,000, as permitted by SEC rules, which is different from the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.“Total” number included in the Summary Compensation Table above). The estimated total annual compensation of our CEO for this period was $4,122,039 compared to the total annualannualized compensation of our median employee which was $76,844.approximately $74,000. The resulting ratio of our CEO’sChief Executive Officer’s pay to the pay of our median employee for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20202021, was 54:1; which is relatively consistent with160:1.

Median Employee Total Annual Compensation Methodology

The methodology used to identify the 49:1 reported forestimated 2021 total annual compensation of our median employee other than our Chief Executive Officer was as follows:

We used the fiscal year endedemployee population as of December 31, 2019. 2021, including all active full-time, part-time, and per diem employees. For employees who were newly hired during 2021, their annualized compensation was used.

We prepared a database including the annualized total gross amount of salary, wages, and other compensation, which—depending on the individual—could include items such as commissions, bonuses, overtime pay, and shift differentials, as reflected in our payroll records for 2021. The compensation measure excluded the following pay elements: (1) grant date fair value of any stock awards granted in 2021; (2) Company-paid 401(k) match made in 2021; and (3) Company-paid health insurance premiums in 2021.

We calculated the median gross pay (as described in the second bullet above) and selected the employee that made up the median.

The pay ratio reported above is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.

In determiningSEC rules based on our internal records and the methodology described above. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the Company usedpay ratio based on that employee’s total annual compensation allow companies to adopt a consistently appliedvariety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation measure. practices. Therefore, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates, and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The compensation measure included salary received in fiscal year 2020 including commissions and bonuses (if applicable). The compensation measure excluded the following pay elements: grant date fair value of stock option granted in fiscal year 2020, Company-paid 401(k) match made during fiscal year 2020 and Company-paid insurance premiums during fiscal year 2020. For purposes of determining the median employee, the Company used the employee populationtable provides information as of December 31, 2020 including all active full-time, part-time2021, regarding the number of shares of Company common stock that may be issued under the Company’s equity compensation plans.

 Plan Category  

 

 

Number of

securities to be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants, and rights

   

 

 

Weighted

average exercise
price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

   

 

 

Number of

securities remaining
available for future
issuance under equity
compensation plans

 

 Equity compensation plans approved by

 security holders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amended and Restated Equity

Incentive Plan (“Equity Incentive

Plan”) (1)

 

 

  2,966,195  

 

 $                        25.46  

 

  6,807,119 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

(“ESPP”) (2)

 

 

    

 

  N/A  

 

  124,557 
  

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total

 

 

  2,966,195  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  6,931,676 
  

 

 

     

 

 

 

(1)

The Company’s Equity Incentive Plan was amended, restated and subsequently approved by a majority of stockholders on December 21, 2015, and amended and subsequently approved by a majority of stockholders on May 25, 2017, and then again on May 27, 2021. The most recent amendment increased the maximum aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock reserved and available for issuance under the Amended Plan to 25,625,000.

(2)

The Company’s ESPP was amended, restated, and subsequently approved by a majority of stockholders on June 6, 2013, and amended and subsequently approved by a majority of stockholders on May 25, 2017, and then again on June 1, 2018. The most recent amendment increased the maximum aggregate number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the ESPP to 1,500,000.

Currently, the Company’s Equity Incentive Plan, as amended on May 27, 2021, and per diem employees.

The median employee was selected by (i) calculating the Company’s ESPP, as amended on June 1, 2018, are the only equity compensation for each of our employees (excluding the CEO) using the consistently applied compensation measure as defined above, (ii) ranking the employees based on that compensation from lowest to highest, and (iii) selecting the employee that fallsplans in the middle of that population.effect.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information as of April 1, 20212022, with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by:

 

each person or group known by the Company to own beneficially more than five percent of the Company’s outstanding common stock.stock;

each director and Named Executive Officer of the Company; and

the directors and executive officers of the Company as a group;group.

 

  
Title of Class 

Name And Address Of

Beneficial Owner

 Amount and Nature
Of Beneficial
Ownership (1)
 Percent Of Class (1)  

Name And Address Of

Beneficial Owner (1)

 

Amount and Nature

Of Beneficial

Ownership (1)

  Percent Of Class  (1) 
5% Stockholders     

5% Stockholders

 

Common

 

Blackrock, Inc.

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

 17,246,570 14.7%  Artisan Partners Limited Partnership (2)  7,732,355   6.2% 

Common

 

The Vanguard Group

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

 11,167,578  9.5%  Blackrock, Inc. (3)  19,328,254   15.6% 

Named Executive Officers and Directors

   

Common

 The Vanguard Group (4)  12,856,969   10.4% 

Common

 Wellington Management Group LLP (5)  11,069,283   8.9% 

Directors and Named Executive Officers

Directors and Named Executive Officers

 

Common

 Douglas M. VanOort (2) 3,161,770  2.7%  Douglas M. VanOort  1,588,442   1.3% 

Common

 Steven C. Jones (3) 1,389,899 1.2%  Mark W. Mallon (6)  295,361   * 

Common

 Raymond R. Hipp (4) 77,851  *  Lynn A. Tetrault (7)  46,202   * 

Common

 Kevin C. Johnson (5) 42,034  *  Bruce K. Crowther  49,564   * 

Common

 Bruce K. Crowther (6) 67,217  *  David J. Daly  1,623   * 

Common

 Dr. Alison L. Hannah (7) 99,530  *  Dr. Alison L. Hannah (8)  102,611   * 

Common

 Lynn A. Tetrault (8) 42,283  *  Stephen M. Kanovsky (9)  16,915   * 

Common

 Stephen M. Kanovsky (9) 13,834  *  Michael A. Kelly (10)  7,086   * 

Common

 Michael A. Kelly (10) 4,005  *  Rachel A. Stahler (11)  9,227   * 

Common

 Rachel A. Stahler (11) 6,146  *  Kathryn B. McKenzie (12)  210,767   * 

Common

 Kathryn B. McKenzie (12) 94,859  *  George A. Cardoza (13)  544,578   * 

Common

 Douglas M. Brown (13) 122,898  *  Halley E. Gilbert  147,683   * 

Common

 Robert J. Shovlin (14) 280,705  *  Dr. Clive D. Morris  41,280   * 

Common

 Dr. Lawrence M. Weiss (15) 130,847  *  Directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons) (14)  1,219,576   1.0% 

Common

 Directors and Named Executive Officers as a Group (16) 5,533,878  4.7% 

* Less than 1%

 

 (1)

The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned are determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act“Exchange Act”), and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rule, beneficial ownership includes any shares over which the individual or entity has voting power or investment power and any

shares of common stock that the individual has the right to acquire within 60 days of April 1, 2021,2022, through the exercise of any stock option or other right. As of April 1, 2021, 117,048,1932022, 124,112,085 shares of the Company’s

common stock were outstanding. The information in the table is based upon information supplied by executive officers and directors and Schedules 13G filed with the SEC. The address of all of our executive officers and directors is in care of NeoGenomics, Inc. at 12701 Commonwealth Drive Suite 9,9490 NeoGenomics Way, Fort Myers, FL 33913.Florida 33912.

 (2)

Douglas M. VanOort, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, has direct ownership of 2,474,716 shares and options exercisable within 60 days of April 1, 2021 to purchase 672,054Represents shares of NeoGenomics common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 2021, based on a Schedule 13G filed jointly on February 4, 2022, by Artisan Partners Limited Partnership, Artisan Investments GP LLC, Artisan Partners Holdings LP, and Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (collectively, “Artisan”) In such filing Artisan lists its address as 875 East Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53202, and indicates that it has sole voting power with respect to 6,961,049 shares of our common stock and sole dispositive power with respect to 7,732,355 shares of our common stock. Totals for Mr. VanOort include 15,000 shares indirectly held in a custodial account benefiting Mr. VanOort’s children.

 (3)

Steven C. Jones, a director of the Company, has direct ownership of 90,218 shares and options exercisable within 60 days of April 1, 2021 to purchase 3,448Represents shares of NeoGenomics common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 2021, based on a Schedule 13G/A filed on January 27, 2022, by BlackRock, Inc. In such filing, BlackRock, Inc. lists its address as 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055, and indicates that it has sole voting power with respect to 19,048,445 shares of our common stock and sole dispositive power with respect to 19,328,254 shares of our common stock. Totals for Mr. Jones also include (i) 30,476 shares owned by Jones Network, LP, a family limited partnership that Mr. Jones controls and (ii) 165,757 shares held in certain individual retirement and custodial accounts. In addition, Mr. Jones is the Managing Member of the general partner of Aspen Select Healthcare, LP (“Aspen”); thus he has the right to vote the 1,100,000 shares which Aspen has direct ownership of as well as the 544,100 shares for which Aspen has received a voting proxy.

 (4)

Raymond R. Hipp,Represents shares of NeoGenomics common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 2021, based on a directorSchedule 13G/A filed on February 10, 2022, by The Vanguard Group. In such filing The Vanguard Group lists its address as 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355, and indicates that it has, shared voting power with respect to 217,905 shares of the Company, has direct ownershipour common stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 12,531,234 shares of 66,800our common stock, and shared dispositive power with respect to 325,735 shares and options exercisable within 60 days of April 1, 2021 to purchase 11,051 shares ofour common stock.

 (5)

Kevin C. Johnson,Represents shares of NeoGenomics common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 2021, based on a directorSchedule 13G filed jointly on February 4, 2022, by Wellington Management Group LLP, Wellington Group Holdings LLP, Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP, and Wellington Management Company LLP. (collectively, “Wellington”) In such filing Wellington lists its address as 280 Congress Street, Boston, MA 02210, and indicates that it has shared voting power with respect to 9,950,123 shares of the Company, has direct ownershipour common stock and shared dispositive power with respect to 11,069,283 shares of 30,983 shares and options exercisable within 60 days of April 1, 2021 to purchase 11,051 shares ofour common stock.

 (6)

Bruce K. Crowther, a director of the Company, has direct ownership of 46,483Includes options to purchase 237,960 shares and optionsthat are exercisable within 60 days of April 1, 2021 to purchase 20,734 shares of common stock.2022.

 (7)

Dr. Alison L. Hannah, a director of the Company, has direct ownership of 88,796Includes options to purchase 10,425 shares and optionsthat are exercisable within 60 days of April 1, 2021 to purchase 10,734 shares of common stock.2022.

 (8)

Lynn A. Tetrault, a director of the Company, has direct ownership of 30,469Includes options to purchase 10,734 shares and optionsthat are exercisable within 60 days of April 1, 2021 to purchase 11,814 shares of common stock.2022.

 (9)

Stephen M. Kanovsky, a director of the Company, has direct ownership of 6,117Includes options to purchase 7,717 shares and optionsthat are exercisable within 60 days of April 1, 2021 to purchase 7,717 shares of common stock.2022.

 (10)

Michael A. Kelly, a director of the Company, has direct ownership of 1,782Includes options to purchase 2,223 shares and optionsthat are exercisable within 60 days of April 1, 2021 to purchase 2,223 shares of common stock.2022.

 (11)

Rachel A. Stahler, a director of the Company, has direct ownership of 2,698Includes options to purchase 3,448 shares and optionsthat are exercisable within 60 days of April 1, 2021 to purchase 3,448 shares of common stock.2022.

 (12)

Kathryn B. McKenzie, Chief Financial Officer, has direct ownership of 13,535Includes options to purchase 76,324 shares and optionsthat are exercisable within 60 days of April 1, 2021 to purchase 81,324 shares of common stock.2022.

 (13)

Douglas M. Brown, Chief Strategy and Corporate Development Officer, has direct ownership of 111,644Includes options to purchase 280,421 shares and optionsthat are exercisable within 60 days of April 1, 2021 to purchase 11,254 shares of common stock.2022.

 (14)

Robert J. Shovlin, President of Clinical Services, has direct ownership of 153,747Includes options to purchase 269,734 shares and optionsthat are exercisable within 60 days of April 1, 2021 to purchase 126,958 shares of common stock.

(15)

Dr. Lawrence M. Weiss, Chief Medical Officer, has direct ownership of 105,797 shares and options exercisable within 60 days of April 1, 2021 to purchase 25,050 shares of common stock.

(16)

The total number of shares listed eliminates double counting of shares that may be beneficially attributable to more than one person.2022.

DELINQUENT SECTIONDelinquent Section 16(A) REPORTSReports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our officers, and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent (10%) of our outstanding common stock, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. Such persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with all copies of Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely on our review of the forms furnished to us and written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that all filing requirements applicable to our directors, executive officers, directors and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock were complied with in fiscal year 2020,during 2021, except that for the following three filings due to administrative oversight by the Company:

Ms. StahlerDieter filed onea late Form 4 dueon July 15, 2021, to administrative timing.report the surrender of 56 shares to satisfy the tax obligation in connection with the June 22, 2021, vesting of restricted stock;

Dr. Morris filed a late Form 4 on July 15, 2021, to report an option grant on June 18, 2021; and

Mr. VanOort filed a late Form 4 on August 13, 2021, to report the surrender of 5,919 shares to satisfy the tax obligation in connection with the August 1, 2021, vesting of restricted stock.

FUTURE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALSFuture Stockholder Proposals

To have a proposal proposal—intended to be presentedpresent at our 20222023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders be(2023 Annual Meeting)— considered for inclusion in the Proxy Statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting, a stockholder must deliver written notice of such proposal in writing to the Corporate Secretary at our corporate headquarters no later than December 31, 20212022 (unless the date of the 20222023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is not within 30 days of May 27, 2022,June 2, 2023, in which case the proposal must be received no later than a reasonable period of time before we begin to print and send our proxy materials for our 20222023 Annual Meeting). Such proposal must also comply with the requirements as to form and substance established by the SEC for such a proposal to be included in the Proxy Statement. We reserve the right to reject, rule out of order, or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with these and other applicable requirements.

If a stockholder wishes to present a proposal beforeat the 20222023 Annual Meeting, of Stockholders, but does not wish to have the proposal considered for inclusion in the Proxy Statement and form of proxy in accordance with Rule 14a-8, the stockholder must also give written notice to the Corporate Secretary at our corporate headquarters. Our Corporate Secretary must receive the notice not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to May 27, 2022,June 2, 2023, the anniversary date of the 20212022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders;Meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the 20222023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is called for a date that is not within 30 days before or after May 27, 2022,June 2, 2023, notice by the stockholder in order to be timely must be received not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting was made, whichever first occurs. The proposal must also comply with the other requirements contained in our Amended and Restated Bylaws.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICESTransactions with Related Persons

Summarized below is the aggregate amount of various professional fees billed by our principal accountant, Deloitte & Touche LLP, for the year ended December 31, 2020. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the aggregate amount of various professional fees includes fees billed by our principal accountant, Deloitte & Touche LLP, and our prior principal accountant, Crowe LLP.

   2020

 

   2019 (1)

 

 

Audit fees

  $            1,455,725   $            1,402,118 

Audit related fees

   95,356   71,840

Tax fees

        

All other fees

   9,755   1,895
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $1,560,836  $1,475,853
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1) Aggregate amounts for 2019 include $50,000 of audit fees and $52,580 of audit related fees billed by our prior principal accountant, Crowe LLP.

Audit fees are limited to audit and review services related to the Company’s annual and quarterly reports filed with the SEC, as well as regulatory filings. For 2020, audit related fees related to stand alone audits of subsidiaries and permissible services related to cyber security. For 2019, audit related fees related to stand alone audits of subsidiaries. Tax fees include those related to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. All other fees consist primarily of programs and subscription services.

The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, including the estimated fees and other terms of any such engagement.

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

Consulting Agreements

On May 3, 2010, the Company entered into a consulting agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) with Steven C. Jones, a director, officer and stockholder of the Company, whereby Mr. Jones would provide consulting services to the Company in the capacity of Executive Vice President. On May 3, 2010, the Company also entered into a warrant agreement with Mr. Jones and issued a warrant to purchase 450,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, which were all vested as of December 31, 2016 and fully exercised at December 31, 2017.

On November 4, 2016, the Company amended and restated the Consulting Agreement with Mr. Jones, (the “Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement”). The Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement had an initial term of November 4, 2016 through April 30, 2020, which automatically renews for additional one year periods unless either party provides notice of termination at least three months prior to the expiration of the initial term or any renewal term. Mr. Jones relinquished the title of Executive Vice President effective as of April 4, 2019. In addition, on May 6, 2019, the Company and Mr. Jones entered into a letter agreement to modify certain provisions of the Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement which modifications included, by mutual agreement of the parties, the following: automatic expiration of the Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement on April 30, 2020 unless the parties mutually agree to renew it in writing; a description of consulting services to be provided to the Company (the “Services”) with a target of up to 15 hours per month of working time and attention to the Company; a fixed monthly cash consulting fee in the amount of $5,000 per month for the provision of the Services; and continuation of health insurance coverage at the levels currently in effect. The agreement was terminated on April 30, 2020.

During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, Mr. Jones earned approximately $24,000, $93,000 and $163,000, respectively, for various consulting work performed and reimbursement of incurred expenses. Mr. Jones also earned $0, $0 and $58,013 as payment of bonuses for the periods indicated above. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, Mr. Jones earned approximately $57,000, $51,250, and $50,000, respectively as compensation for his services on the Board.

The following table summarizes stock options and restricted stock granted to Mr. Jones during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018:

Grant Date

 Common Stock
    Shares Granted    
  Restricted
Common Stock
    Shares Granted    
  Fair Value  Fair Value per
Share
      Grant Price     

May 28, 2020 

  3,448    —   $            33,000   $            9.57   $            28.54  

May 28, 2020 

  —    2,698  $77,000  $28.54  $— 

June 6, 2019 

  4,269    —   $34,762   $8.14   $22.52  

June 6, 2019 

  —    3,419  $76,996  $22.52  $— 

June 1, 2018 

  3,017    —   $11,284   $3.74   $11.60  

June 1, 2018 

  —    6,897  $80,005  $11.60  $— 

Corporate Policies as to Related Party Transactions

The Company reviews related party transactions. Related party transactions are transactions that involve the Company’s directors, executive officers, director nominees, 5% or more beneficial owners of the Company’s common stock, immediate family members of these persons, or entities in which one of these persons has a direct or indirect material interest. Transactions that are reviewed as related party transactions by the Company are transactions that involve amounts that would be required to be disclosed in our filings under SEC regulations and certain other similar transactions. Pursuant to the Company’s code of business ethics and conduct (the “Code of Ethics”), employees and directors have a duty to report any potential conflicts of interest to the appropriate level of management or legal counsel as appropriate in the circumstances. The Company evaluates these reports, along with responses to the Company’s annual director and officer questionnaires, for any indication of possible related party transactions. If a transaction is deemed by the Company to be a related party transaction, the information regarding the transaction is reviewed and subject to approval by our Board. The Company makes efforts to ensure that any related party transaction is on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons.

CODE OF ETHICS AND CONDUCT

Our Board adopted a code of business ethics and conduct (the “Code of Ethics”), applicable to all of our executives, directors, and employees. The Code of Ethics is available in print to any stockholder that requests a copy. Copies may be obtained by contacting Investor Relations at our corporate headquarters. Our Code of Ethics is also available inFor the Investors section of our website at www.neogenomics.com. We intend to make any disclosures regarding amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Business Conduct required under Form 8-K by posting such information on our website.year ended December 31, 2021, no reportable related party transactions occurred.

OTHER MATTERSOther Matters

We know of no other matters to be submitted to the stockholders at the 20212022 Annual Meeting. If any other matters properly come before the stockholders at the meeting, the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy will vote the shares they represent in their discretion.

INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCEIncorporation of Certain Information by Reference

The rules of the SEC allow the Company to “incorporate by reference” into this Proxy Statement certain information that we have filed with the SEC. This means that we can disclose important information to our stockholders by referring the stockholders to another document. The information incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement is an important part of this Proxy Statement and is considered to be part of this Proxy Statement from the date we file that information with the SEC. Any reports filed by us with the SEC after the date of this Proxy Statement will automatically update and, where applicable, supersede any information contained in this Proxy Statement or incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.

A copy of any of the documents referred to above will be furnished, without charge, by writing to NeoGenomics, Inc., Attention: Investor Relations, 12701 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 9,9490 NeoGenomics Way, Fort Myers, Florida 33913.33912. The documents referred to above are also available from the EDGAR database that can be obtained through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov or our website at www.neogenomics.com.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE 20212022 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 27, 2021JUNE 2, 2022

FORMForm 10-K ANNUAL REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERSAnnual Report to Stockholders

On February 25, 2021,2022, the Company filed with the SEC its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.2021. We have enclosed the Annual Report with this Proxy Statement. The Annual Report includes our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020,2021, along with other financial information and management discussion, which we urge you to read carefully.

You can also obtain, free of charge, a copy of our 2021 Annual Report by:

 

writing to:

NeoGenomics, Inc.

12701 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 9,9490 NeoGenomics Way, Fort Myers, Florida 3391333912

Attention: Denise E. Pedulla, Corporate Secretary

 

telephoning us at: (866) 776-5907

You can obtain a copy of our 2021 Annual Report and other periodic filings that we make with the SEC at www.neogenomics.com or from the SEC’s EDGAR database at http://www.sec.gov.

2021 ANNUAL MEETING PROXY MATERIALS RESULTS2022 Annual Meeting Proxy Materials Results

Copies of this Proxy Statement and proxy materials ancillary hereto may be found on our website at www.neogenomics.com. We intend to publish final results from the 20212022 Annual Meeting in a Current Report on Form 8-K, which will be filed with the SEC within four business days from the 20212022 Annual Meeting, or as amended thereafter. You may obtain a copy of this and other reports free of charge from the SEC’s EDGAR database at http://www.sec.gov.

DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS TO STOCKHOLDERS SHARING AN ADDRESSDelivery of Documents to Stockholders Sharing an Address

Only one Proxy Statement is being delivered to two or more stockholders who share an address, unless the Company has received contrary instruction from one or more of such stockholders. The Company will promptly deliver, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the Proxy Statement to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the document was delivered. If you would like to request additional copies of the Proxy Statement, or if in the future you would like to receive multiple copies of information or Proxy Statements, or annual reports, or, if you are currently receiving multiple copies of these documents and would, in the future, like to receive only a single copy, please so instruct the Company, by writing to us at 12701 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 9,9490 NeoGenomics Way, Fort Myers, Florida 33913,33912, Attention: Denise E. Pedulla, Corporate Secretary, or calling (866) 776-5907.

Questions and Answers about the 2022 Annual Meeting

Q:  When and where is the 2022 Annual Meeting?

A:  The 2022 Annual Meeting will be held on Thursday, June 2, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. The 2022 Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting, which will be conducted via live webcast. The Company has designed the format of the Annual Meeting to ensure that shareholders are afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting, using online tools to ensure shareholder access and participation. You will be able to attend the 2022 Annual Meeting online and submit your questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NEO2022 and entering your 16-digit control number included in your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. If you lose your 16-digit control number, you may join the 2022 Annual Meeting as a “Guest” but you will not be able to vote, ask questions, or access the list of stockholders as of the close of business on April 5, 2022 (the “Record Date”).

Q:  Who is entitled to vote at the 2022 Annual Meeting?

A:  Holders of NeoGenomics, Inc. common stock at the close of business on the Record Date for the 2022 Annual Meeting established by our Board, are entitled to receive notice of the 2022 Annual Meeting (the “Meeting Notice”), and to vote their shares at the 2022 Annual Meeting and any related adjournments or postponements. The Meeting Notice, Proxy Statement, and form of proxy are first expected to be made available to stockholders on or about April 14, 2022.

As of the close of business on the Record Date, there were 124,113,056 shares of our common stock outstanding, each entitled to one vote. We refer to the holders of shares of our common stock as “stockholders” throughout this Proxy Statement.

Q:  Who can attend the 2022 Annual Meeting?

A:  Admission to the 2022 Annual Meeting is limited to:

• stockholders as of the close of business on the Record Date;

• holders of valid proxies for the 2022 Annual Meeting; and

• our invited guests.

Q:  What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a stockholder who holds stock in street name?

A:  If your shares are registered in your name, as evidenced and recorded in the stock ledger maintained by the Company and our transfer agent, you are a stockholder of record. If your shares are held through a broker, bank or other nominee, these shares are held in street name.

If you are a stockholder of record and you have requested printed proxy materials, we have enclosed a proxy card for you to use for voting. If you hold our shares in street name through one or more banks, brokers, or other nominees, you will receive the Meeting Notice, together with voting instructions, from the third party or parties through which you hold your shares. If you requested printed proxy materials, your broker, bank, or other nominee has enclosed a voting instruction card for you to use in directing the broker, bank, or other nominee regarding how to vote your shares.

Q:  What are the quorum requirements for the 2022 Annual Meeting?

A:  The presence virtually or by proxy of persons entitled to vote a majority of shares of our outstanding common stock at the 2022 Annual Meeting constitutes a quorum. Your shares of our common stock will be counted as present at the 2022 Annual Meeting for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum if a proxy card has been properly submitted by you or on your behalf, or you vote virtually at the 2022 Annual Meeting. Abstaining votes and broker non-votes are counted for purposes of establishing a quorum.

Q:  What matters will the stockholders vote on at the 2022 Annual Meeting?

A: The stockholders will vote on the following proposals:

• Proposal 1—Election of Directors.

• Proposal 2—Advisory Vote on the Compensation Paid to our Named Executive Officers.

• Proposal 3—Approval of Third Amendment of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended and restated).

• Proposal 4 - Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

We will also consider other business properly brought before the 2022 Annual Meeting.

Q:  What vote is required to approve each proposal?

A:  Provided a quorum is present, the following are the voting requirements for each proposal:

• Proposal 1—Election of Directors

Each of the seven director nominees will be elected if a majority of the votes cast by stockholders virtually or via proxy are cast in favor of each respective nominee, requiring the number of votes cast “for” a director nominee’s election to exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director nominee. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 1.

• Proposal 2—Advisory Vote on the Compensation Paid to our Named Executive Officers

Proposal 2 will be approved if a majority of the votes cast by stockholders virtually or via proxy with respect to this matter are cast in favor of the proposal. You may vote “for” or “against” or abstain from voting on Proposal 2. Because the proposal to approve the compensation paid to Named Executive Officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 is advisory, it will not be binding on us or the Board. However, our compensation committee intends to take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 2.

• Proposal 3—Approval of Third Amendment of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended and restated)

Proposal 3 will be approved if a majority of the votes cast by stockholders virtually or via proxy with respect to this matter are cast in favor of the proposal. You may vote “for” or “against” or abstain from voting on Proposal 3. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 3.

• Proposal 4—Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Proposal 4 will be approved if a majority of the votes cast by stockholders virtually or via proxy with respect to this matter are cast in favor of the proposal. You may vote “for” or “against” or abstain from voting on Proposal 4. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 4.

Q:  What are the Board’s voting recommendations?

A:  Our Board recommends that you vote your shares:

• “FOR” the election of the seven directors nominated by our Board, each to serve until the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders or until such director’s successor shall have been duly elected and qualified.

“FOR” the advisory approval of the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers;

“FOR” the approval of the Third Amendment of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended and restated); and

“FOR” the ratification of the appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Q:  How do I vote?

A:  You may vote electronically at the meeting, by mail, or by internet or telephone.

• During the meeting. To attend and participate in the 2022 Annual Meeting via live webcast, you will need the 16-digit control number included in your Notice and Access Card, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. If your shares are held in “street name,” you should contact your bank or broker to obtain your 16-digit control number or otherwise vote through the bank or broker. If you lose your 16-digit control number, you may join the 2022 Annual Meeting as a “Guest” but you will not be able to vote, ask questions, or access the list of stockholders as of the Record Date.

By mail. If you elected to receive printed proxy materials by mail, you may vote by signing and returning the proxy card provided. Please allow sufficient time for mailing if you decide to vote by mail.

By internet or telephone. You may also vote over the internet at www.proxyvote.com or vote by telephone at 1-800-690-6903. Please see proxy card for voting instructions.

Q:  How can I change or revoke my vote?

A: You may change your vote as follows:

Stockholders of record. You may change or revoke your vote by submitting a written notice of revocation to NeoGenomics, Inc., 9490 NeoGenomics Way, Fort Myers, Florida 33912, Attention: Corporate Secretary, or by submitting another proxy card before the conclusion of the 2022 Annual Meeting. For all methods of voting, the last vote cast will supersede all previous votes.

Beneficial owners of shares held in“street name.” You may change or revoke your voting instructions by following the specific directions provided to you by your bank or broker or other nominee.

Q:  What if I do not specify a choice for a matter when returning a proxy?

A:  Your proxy will be treated as follows:

Stockholders of record. If you are a stockholder of record and you sign and return a proxy card without giving specific voting instructions, then the proxy holders will vote your shares in the manner recommended by the Board on all matters presented in this Proxy Statement and as the proxy holders may determine in their discretion for any other matters properly presented for a vote at the meeting.

Beneficial owners of shares held instreet name.” If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name and do not provide the organization that holds your shares with specific voting instructions, the organization that holds your shares may generally vote on routine matters but cannot vote on non-routine matters. If the organization that holds your shares does not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares on a non-routine matter, the organization that holds your shares will inform the inspector of election that it does not have the authority to vote on this matter with respect to your shares. This is referred to as a “broker non-vote.”

Q:  What are abstentions?

A:  An abstention represents the action by a stockholder to refrain from voting “for” or “against” a proposal.

Q:  Which ballot measures are considered “routine” or “non-routine?”

A:  The ratification of appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (“Proposal 4”) is considered to be a routine matter under applicable rules. Broker non-votes are not expected to occur on this proposal and will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 4.

The election of directors (“Proposal 1”), the advisory vote on the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers (“Proposal 2”), and the approval of the third amendment of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended and restated) (“Proposal 3”) are considered to be non-routine matters under applicable rules. A broker or other nominee cannot vote without instructions on non-routine matters and therefore, there may be broker non-votes on Proposals 1, 2 and 3.

Q:  Could other matters be decided at the 2022 Annual Meeting?

A:  As of the date of the filing of this Proxy Statement, we were not aware of any matters to be raised at the 2022 Annual Meeting other than those referred to in this Proxy Statement. If other matters are properly presented at the 2022 Annual Meeting for consideration, the proxy holders for the 2022 Annual Meeting will have the discretion to vote on those matters for stockholders who have submitted a proxy card.

Q:  Who is soliciting proxies and what is the cost?

A:  We are making, and will bear all expenses incurred in connection with, the solicitation of proxies. Although we do not currently contemplate doing so, we may engage a proxy solicitation firm to assist us in soliciting proxies, and if we do so we will pay the fees of any such firm. In addition to solicitation by mail, our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies from stockholders by telephone, letter, electronic mail, facsimile, or virtually. Following the original mailing of the Meeting Notice, we will request brokers, custodians, nominees and other record holders to forward their own notice and, upon request, to forward copies of the Proxy Statement and related soliciting materials to persons for whom they hold shares of our common stock and to request authority for the exercise of proxies. In such cases, upon the request of the record holders, we will reimburse such holders for their reasonable expenses.

Q:  What should I do if I have questions regarding the 2022 Annual Meeting?

A:  If you have any questions about the 2022 Annual Meeting or would like additional copies of any of the documents referred to in this Proxy Statement, please contact our Investor Relations department by phone at (239) 768-0600.

ANNEX A:

SECONDTHIRD AMENDMENT OF THE

NEOGENOMICS, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED EQUITY INCENTIVEEMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

(AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE AS OF OCTOBER 15, 2015)APRIL 16, 2013 AND FURTHER AMENDED

ON APRIL 20, 2017 AND APRIL 20, 2018 )

This SecondThird Amendment of the NeoGenomics, Inc. AmendedEmployee Stock Purchase Plan (as most recently amended on April 20, 2018, and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of October 15, 2015)effective on June 1, 2018) (“SecondThird Amendment”) is made and adopted by NeoGenomics, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), subject to approval by the stockholders of the Company.

WHEREAS, the Company maintains the NeoGenomics, Inc. AmendedEmployee Stock Purchase Plan (as most recently amended on April 20, 2018, and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of October 15, 2015)effective on June 1, 2018) (the “Plan”).

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) may amend the Plan at any time, pursuant to and subject to Section 2314 of the Plan, contingent on approval by stockholders of the Company, if stockholder approval is required by applicable securities exchange rules or applicable law.

WHEREAS, the Board, upon recommendation fromby its Culture and Compensation Committee, has determined that it is advisable and in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders to amend the Plan to (i)(a) increase the number of shares of common stock availablereserved for issuance under the Plan by 6,975,000 shares, and (ii) increase the annual individual award limits from 1,000,000 shares, increasing the Plan share reserve from 1,500,000 shares to 2,000,000 shares.2,500,000 shares; and (b) extend the term of the Plan to, unless sooner terminated in accordance with its terms, June 2, 2032.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:follows, subject to approval by the stockholders of the Company:

 

 1.

Section 4.14(a) of the Plan (Share Reserve) is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows, effective May     , 2021, subject to approval by the stockholders of the Company:June 2, 2022:

(a) Subject to adjustment as providedthe provisions of Section 13 relating to adjustments upon changes in Section 22,securities, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock reserved and available for issuanceShares that may be sold pursuant to Rights granted under the Plan shall be 25,625,000 shares of Common Stock. All such shares of Common Stock available for issuancenot exceed in the aggregate 2,500,000 shares. If any Right granted under the Plan shall befor any reason terminate without having been exercised, the Shares not purchased under such Right shall again become available for issuance as Incentive Stock Options.the Plan.

 

 2.

Section 4.3Unless sooner terminated in accordance with its terms, the term of thethis Plan (Code Section 162(m) Limitation) is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows, effective May    , 2021, subjectshall be extended to approval by the stockholders of the Company:June 2, 2032.

“4.3 Limitation on Awards. The total number of shares of Common Stock for which Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights may be granted to any employee during any 12 month period shall not exceed 2,000,000 shares in the aggregate (as adjusted pursuant to Section 22). The total number of shares of Common Stock for which Restricted Stock Awards, Deferred Stock Awards, Stock Bonus Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards may be granted to any employee during any twelve month period shall not exceed 2,000,000 shares in the aggregate (as adjusted pursuant to Section 22).”

 

 3.

Except as expressly or by necessary implication amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

[signature page follows]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereby certify that the foregoing Second Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of NeoGenomics, Inc. on April     , 2021.

NEOGENOMICS, INC.
Sign
Name:
Print:
Name: Kathryn B. McKenzie
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: April     , 2021

* * * * *

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereby certify that the foregoing Second Amendment was approved by the stockholders of NeoGenomics, Inc. on May     , 2021.

NEOGENOMICS, INC.

Sign

Name:

Print

Name: Kathryn B. McKenzie

Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: May     , 2021

 

 

NEOGENOMICS, INC.

ATTN: KATHRYN B. MCKENZIEHALLEY E. GILBERT

12701 COMMONWEALTH DRIVE, SUITE 99490 NEOGENOMICS WAY

FORT MYERS, FL 3391333912

 

LOGO

VOTE BY INTERNET

Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.comwww.proxyvote.comor scan the QR Barcode above

 

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

 

During The Meeting- Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NEO2021NEO2022

 

You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.

 

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

 

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

D44151-P47100D74757-P65457                                 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

— — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 

 

 

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

 DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

 

 

 

NEOGENOMICS, INC.

         
  

 

Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR proposal 1.

       
            
  

 

1.  Election of Directors. To elect nine (9) members of our Board, each to hold office for a one (1) year term ending on the date ofdirectors named in the next succeeding annual meeting of stockholders or until such director’s successor shall have been duly elected and qualified.proxy statement as set forth below:

           
    For Withhold         
  

 

1a.     Douglas M. VanOortLynn A. Tetrault

 

 

 

 

 

   Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR proposal 2.  For Against Abstain 
  

 

1b.     Mark W. MallonBruce K. Crowther

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

2.    Advisory VoteApproval, on an advisory basis, of the Compensation Paid to ourthe Company's Named Executive Officers.

  

 

 

 

 

 

 
  

 

1c.     Lynn A. TetraultDavid J. Daly

 

 

 

 

 

       
  

 

1d.     Bruce K. CrowtherDr. Alison L. Hannah

 

 

 

 

 

   Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR proposal 3.  For Against Abstain 
  

 

1e.     Dr. Alison L. HannahStephen M. Kanovsky

 

 

 

 

 

   

3.    SecondApproval of the Third Amendment of the Amended and Restated Equity IncentiveEmployee Stock Purchase Plan.

     
  

 

1f.      Kevin C. JohnsonMichael A. Kelly

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR proposal 4.

  

 

For

 

 

Against

 

 

Abstain

 
  

 

1g.     Stephen M. KanovskyRachel A. Stahler

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

4.    Ratification of the Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

  

 

 

 

 

 

 
  

1h.     Michael A. Kelly

 

 

       
  

1i.      Rachel A. Stahler

 

 

         
           
 

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) on your stock certificate. If held in joint tenancy, all persons should sign. Trustees, administrators, etc., should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the proxy.

         
     
  

        

       

                                 
  

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

 

 

Date

 

     

Signature (Joint Owners)

 

 

Date

 

     


 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.

 

 

— — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

D44152-P47100D74758-P65457

 

 

NEOGENOMICS, INC.

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

May 27, 2021June 2, 2022 10:00 AM (Eastern Time)

This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors

The undersigned hereby appoints DeniseHalley E. PedullaGilbert and KathrynWilliam B. McKenzie,Bonello, and each or either of them, as the true and lawful attorneys of the undersigned, with full power of substitution and revocation, and authorizes them, and each of them, to vote all the shares of capital stock of NeoGenomics, Inc. which the undersigned is entitled to vote at said meeting and any adjournment thereof upon the matters specified and upon such other matters as may be properly brought before the meeting or any adjournment thereof, conferring authority upon such true and lawful attorneys to vote in their discretion on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting and revoking any proxy heretofore given.

THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, SHARES WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE DIRECTORS IN PROPOSAL 1, FOR THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY VOTE ONBASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION PAID TO OURTHE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS IN PROPOSAL 2, FOR THE SECONDAPPROVAL OF THE THIRD AMENDMENT OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED EQUITY INCENTIVEEMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN IN PROPOSAL 3, AND FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM IN PROPOSAL 4.

Continued and to be signed on reverse side